Insects in polypore fungi as indicator species: a comparison between forest sites differing in amounts and continuity of dead wood
To effectively preserve the threatened fauna of old-growth forest it is important to identify species that are adversely affected by forest management. We focused on insect species living in fruiting bodies of two polypore species and compared their frequency between forests sites differing in terms...
Saved in:
Published in: | Forest ecology and management Vol. 157; no. 1; pp. 101 - 118 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01-03-2002
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To effectively preserve the threatened fauna of old-growth forest it is important to identify species that are adversely affected by forest management. We focused on insect species living in fruiting bodies of two polypore species and compared their frequency between forests sites differing in terms of the continuity with which their breeding substrate (dead wood) was available (long, short or no continuity). The polypore species studied were
Fomitopsis
pinicola and
Fomes
fomentarius, in which the patterns of occurrence were determined for 25 and 27 insect species, respectively. Species showing significantly higher frequency in less managed forests were
Oplocephala
haemorrhoidalis (Tenebrionidae),
Cis
quadridens (Cisidae), and
Scardia
boletella (Tineidae). Some less frequent species showed similar, but non-significant, trends. We suggest that polypore-inhabiting species restricted to sites with a long, continuous supply of dead wood might be used as indicators of sites of high conservation value. Their presence might also be indicative of species of high conservation value in other dead-wood microhabitats with similar temporal and spatial dynamics. The species that we found to be restricted to less managed forests are all included on the Swedish red-list. However, two species not affected by management are also red-listed, showing that numbers of red-listed species must be used with caution as a measure of conservation value. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0378-1127 1872-7042 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00662-9 |