A practical method of modeling a treatment couch using cone-beam computed tomography for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and RapidArc treatment delivery

• Published in: Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 304 - 313
• Main Authors: Aldosary, Ghada, M.Sc, Nobah, Ahmad, M.Sc, Al-Zorkani, Faisal, M.Sc, Devic, Slobodan, Ph.D, Moftah, Belal, Ph.D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 2015
• Subjects: ABSORBED RADIATION DOSES; Beam attenuation; CBCT; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; ERRORS; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine; Humans; IMRT; IONIZATION CHAMBERS; Models, Theoretical; PHOTON BEAMS; PLANNING; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY; Radiology; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOTHERAPY; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation; SIMULATION; Treatment couch; Treatment planning; TWO-DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS; VMAT; VMAT; Beam attenuation; IMRT; Treatment planning; Treatment couch; CBCT
• ISSN: 0958-3947; 1873-4022
• DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2015.03.008

Abstract The effect of a treatment couch on dose perturbation is not always fully considered in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In the course of inverse planning radiotherapy techniques, beam parameter optimization may change in the absence of the couch, causing errors in the calculated dose distributions. Although modern treatment planning systems (TPS) include data for the treatment couch components, they are not manufactured identically. Thus, variations in their Hounsfield unit (HU) values may exist. Moreover, a radiotherapy facility may wish to have a third-party custom tabletop installed that is not included by the TPS vendor. This study demonstrates a practical and simple method of acquiring reliable computed tomography (CT) data for the treatment couch and shows how the absorbed dose calculated with the modeled treatment couch can differ from that with the default treatment couch found in the TPS. We also experimentally verified that neglecting to incorporate the treatment couch completely in the treatment planning process might result in dose differences of up to 9.5% and 7.3% for 4-MV and 10-MV photon beams, respectively. Furthermore, 20 RapidArc and IMRT cases were used to quantify the change in calculated dose distributions caused by using either the default or modeled couch. From 2-dimensional (2D) ionization chamber array measurements, we observed large dose distribution differences between the measurements and calculations when the couch was omitted that varied according to the planning technique and anatomic site. Thus, incorporating the treatment couch in the dose calculation phase of treatment planning significantly decreases dose calculation errors.