Characteristics of Serve, Reception and Set That Determine the Setting Efficacy in Men's Volleyball

The aim of this investigation was to establish the criteria of service, reception and set that determine setting efficacy in world-class top-level volleyball. The study sample consisted of 4.113 gaming actions (1.371 serve actions, 1.371 reception actions, and 1.371 set actions), corresponding to th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 11; p. 222
Main Authors: González-Silva, Jara, Fernández-Echeverría, Carmen, Conejero, Manuel, Moreno, M Perla
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 18-02-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this investigation was to establish the criteria of service, reception and set that determine setting efficacy in world-class top-level volleyball. The study sample consisted of 4.113 gaming actions (1.371 serve actions, 1.371 reception actions, and 1.371 set actions), corresponding to the observation of four matches for each of the 12 best ranked teams in the Volleyball World Championship - a total of 23 matches. The criteria were: in-game role of the server, serve zone, type of serve, striking technique and serve direction; receiver player, reception zone, and reception efficacy; setting zone, type of set, setting technique, setting efficacy, a set's area, and set tempo. Multinomial logistic regression showed that criteria related to reception (reception efficacy) and to set (setting zone, type of set, a set's area, and set tempo) determined set efficacy. Specifically, positive and negative receptions and settings from acceptable and non-acceptable zones reduced perfect setting. In contrast, the jump set toward zones three and six and the first and second tempo increased perfect setting. Serve criteria did not determine set efficacy. This study can guide trainers and players in the training process.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Movement Science and Sport Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Patrícia Coutinho, University of Porto, Portugal; Verónica Morales-Sánchez, Universidad de Málaga, Spain
Edited by: Rubén Maneiro, Pontifical University of Salamanca, Spain
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00222