Lab-Specific Gene Expression Signatures in Pluripotent Stem Cells

Pluripotent stem cells derived from both embryonic and reprogrammed somatic cells have significant potential for human regenerative medicine. Despite similarities in developmental potential, however, several groups have found fundamental differences between embryonic stem cell (ESC) and induced-plur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cell stem cell Vol. 7; no. 2; pp. 258 - 262
Main Authors: Newman, Aaron M., Cooper, James B.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge, MA Elsevier Inc 06-08-2010
Cell Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Pluripotent stem cells derived from both embryonic and reprogrammed somatic cells have significant potential for human regenerative medicine. Despite similarities in developmental potential, however, several groups have found fundamental differences between embryonic stem cell (ESC) and induced-pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines that may have important implications for iPSC-based medical therapies. Using an unsupervised clustering algorithm, we further studied the genetic homogeneity of iPSC and ESC lines by reanalyzing microarray gene expression data from seven different laboratories. Unexpectedly, this analysis revealed a strong correlation between gene expression signatures and specific laboratories in both ESC and iPSC lines. Nearly one-third of the genes with lab-specific expression signatures are also differentially expressed between ESCs and iPSCs. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that in vitro microenvironmental context differentially impacts the gene expression signatures of both iPSCs and ESCs. ► iPSC and ESC gene expression correlates with lab of origin ► Lab-specific signatures overshadow iPSC and ESC expression differences
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1934-5909
1875-9777
DOI:10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.016