Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians using a proximal endovascular occlusion cerebral protection device: A multicenter registry

Background: Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians. Purpose: The aim of this multicenter prospective registry...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions Vol. 76; no. 1; pp. 9 - 15
Main Authors: Micari, Antonio, Stabile, Eugenio, Cremonesi, Alberto, Vadalà, Giuseppe, Castriota, Fausto, Pernice, Vincenzo, Sorropago, Giovanni, Rubino, Paolo, Biamino, Giancarlo
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01-07-2010
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Background: Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians. Purpose: The aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high‐volume centers by experienced operators. Methods: From July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days. Results: 198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In‐hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device‐related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30‐day follow‐up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30‐day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients (P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender. Conclusion: This multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
AbstractList Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians. The aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high-volume centers by experienced operators. From July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days. 198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In-hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device-related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30-day follow-up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30-day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients (P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender. This multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines.
Background : Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians. Purpose : The aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high‐volume centers by experienced operators. Methods : From July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days. Results : 198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In‐hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device‐related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30‐day follow‐up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30‐day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients ( P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender. Conclusion : This multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Background: Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians. Purpose: The aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high-volume centers by experienced operators. Methods: From July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days. Results: 198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In-hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device-related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30-day follow-up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30-day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients (P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender. Conclusion: This multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines. [copy 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Background: Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians. Purpose: The aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high‐volume centers by experienced operators. Methods: From July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days. Results: 198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In‐hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device‐related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30‐day follow‐up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30‐day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients (P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender. Conclusion: This multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUNDCarotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians.PURPOSEThe aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high-volume centers by experienced operators.METHODSFrom July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days.RESULTS198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In-hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device-related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30-day follow-up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30-day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients (P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender.CONCLUSIONThis multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines.
Author Sorropago, Giovanni
Stabile, Eugenio
Pernice, Vincenzo
Rubino, Paolo
Cremonesi, Alberto
Vadalà, Giuseppe
Castriota, Fausto
Micari, Antonio
Biamino, Giancarlo
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Antonio
  surname: Micari
  fullname: Micari, Antonio
  email: antoniomicari@tiscali.it
  organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Palermo, Italy
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Eugenio
  surname: Stabile
  fullname: Stabile, Eugenio
  organization: Cardiology Unit, Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano (AV), Italy
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Alberto
  surname: Cremonesi
  fullname: Cremonesi, Alberto
  organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Cotignola (RA), Italy
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Giuseppe
  surname: Vadalà
  fullname: Vadalà, Giuseppe
  organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Palermo, Italy
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Fausto
  surname: Castriota
  fullname: Castriota, Fausto
  organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Lecce, Italy
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Vincenzo
  surname: Pernice
  fullname: Pernice, Vincenzo
  organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Palermo, Italy
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Giovanni
  surname: Sorropago
  fullname: Sorropago, Giovanni
  organization: Cardiology Unit, Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano (AV), Italy
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Paolo
  surname: Rubino
  fullname: Rubino, Paolo
  organization: Cardiology Unit, Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano (AV), Italy
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Giancarlo
  surname: Biamino
  fullname: Biamino, Giancarlo
  organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Palermo, Italy
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20578188$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kT1vFDEQhi2UiHxAwR9A7iDFJf5Y73rpoiUXIp2SBgKisbz27MmwZwfbG3I1fxwfd0kXqhmNn3nHM-8R2vPBA0JvKDmlhLAzY-wpY4LwF-iQCsZmDau_7e1y2lb1ATpK6QchpK1Z-xIdMCIaSaU8RH86HUN2FuuYIa5xyuCz80vsPA4mhyV4HZ32CU9pU9b4LoYHt9IjBm_DvU5mGnUsrBkLETw2EKGP5b2AGUze1CzcOwMf8DleTWMuqS_DcISlSzmuX6H9QY8JXu_iMfoyv_jcfZotbi6vuvPFzFQ15WUpID1wydqqaivJam4J5ZqYCoQZKkJo03PL-0bbnmtNxWCpGSxQ0nMpB8GP0butbvnZrwlSViuXDIyj9hCmpBrORS2paAr5_r8kZVxSRoXciJ5sURNDShEGdRfLeeJaUaI27qjijvrnTmHf7mSnfgX2iXy0owBnW-C3G2H9vJLquo-PkrNtR7kkPDx16PhT1Q1vhPp6fam-385v59cdUwv-F6n8rLw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_ccd_25025
crossref_primary_10_3171_2013_5_JNS1331
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00392_012_0479_4
crossref_primary_10_5797_jnet_or_13041
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2019_04_187
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2011_00635_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_avsg_2012_09_020
crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_111_624155
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12265_014_9567_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acvfr_2011_12_014
crossref_primary_10_3174_ajnr_A5103
crossref_primary_10_4244_EIJV7I7A129
crossref_primary_10_1111_joic_12037
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00701_012_1508_9
crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_110_596833
crossref_primary_10_1590_0100_69912014005003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_avsg_2010_12_001
crossref_primary_10_1002_ccd_24984
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00772_012_1064_x
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.059
10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.043
10.1161/01.CIR.97.5.501
10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.049
10.1161/01.STR.0000236101.09480.b7
10.1161/01.STR.20.7.864
10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.08.012
10.1056/NEJM199811123392002
10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.045
10.1016/j.jvs.2004.11.021
10.2105/AJPH.79.12.1617
10.4244/EIJV3I5A106
10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.022
10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.022
10.1583/04-1400MR.1
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013
10.1067/mva.2000.102730
10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.062
10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.019
10.1093/eurheartj/ehl421
10.1583/06-1836.1
10.1056/NEJMoa040127
10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09292-1
10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70079-5
10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00618-5
10.1016/j.jvs.2007.06.048
10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.003
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
(c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
– notice: (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
DBID BSCLL
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7TK
7X8
DOI 10.1002/ccd.22503
DatabaseName Istex
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
CrossRef
Neurosciences Abstracts

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1522-726X
EndPage 15
ExternalDocumentID 10_1002_ccd_22503
20578188
CCD22503
ark_67375_WNG_ZVFVFNC2_L
Genre article
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Italy
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Italy
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1L6
1OC
29B
31~
33P
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
5GY
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AAQQT
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.X
HBH
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
JPC
KBYEO
KQQ
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
ROL
RWI
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
V2E
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XPP
XV2
~IA
~WT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
.GJ
53G
AAMNL
AAYXX
CITATION
EBD
EMOBN
SV3
ZGI
7TK
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-72e0be382944948263d013a0c4e5cf40017b3d3b7adb3aa15fd1cfde10b388f53
IEDL.DBID 33P
ISSN 1522-1946
1522-726X
IngestDate Sat Aug 17 01:45:39 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 16 23:57:59 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 20:43:33 EST 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:47:00 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 00:59:10 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 30 09:51:55 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4613-72e0be382944948263d013a0c4e5cf40017b3d3b7adb3aa15fd1cfde10b388f53
Notes ArticleID:CCD22503
ark:/67375/WNG-ZVFVFNC2-L
istex:849DD4FD0E729C2F37BAFFB2174A28D7B6B56A71
Conflict of interest: No conflicts of interest exist, with exception of Prof G. Biamino, who is scientific consulting of Invatec.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
PMID 20578188
PQID 1238121585
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_733568157
proquest_miscellaneous_1238121585
crossref_primary_10_1002_ccd_22503
pubmed_primary_20578188
wiley_primary_10_1002_ccd_22503_CCD22503
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_ZVFVFNC2_L
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 1 July 2010
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2010
  text: 1 July 2010
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Hoboken
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Hoboken
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
PublicationTitleAlternate Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
References Gray W,Chaturvedi S,Verta P; on behalf of the Investigators and the Executive Committees. Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 159-166.
Miller MT,Comerota AJ,Tzilinis A,Daoud Y,Hammerling J. Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: Does increased age indicate "high risk"? J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 231-237.
Estes JM,Guadagnoli E,Wolf R,Logerfo FW,Whittemore AD. The impact of cardiac comorbidity after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28: 577-584.
Kastrup A,Schulz JB,Raygrotzki S,Gröschel K,Ernemann U. Comparison of angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection versus endarterectomy for treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis in elderly patients. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 945-951.
Stanziale SF,Luke M,Boules Tn,Brimmeier JA,Hill K,Makaroun MS. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians is associated with increased adverse outcomes. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43: 297-304.
Hernan AB,Sanjeev P,Hamid M,Tassos K,Alan D. Increased aortic arch calcification in patients older than 75 years: Implications for carotid artery stenting in elderly patients. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 841-845.
Cremonesi A,Setacci C,Bignamini A,Bolognese L,Briganti F,Di Sciascio G,Inzitari D,Lanza G,Lupattelli L,Mangiafico S,Pratesi C,Reimers B,Ricci S,de Donato G,Ugolotti U,Zaninelli A,Gensini GF. Carotid artery stenting: First consensus document of the ICCS-SPREAD Joint Committee. Stroke 2006; 37: 2400-2409.
Stabile E,Sorropago G,Tesorio T,Salemme L,Ambrosini V,Cioppa A,Popusoi G,Nammas W,Biamino G,Rubino P. Use of endovascular clamping as neuroprotection during carotid stenting in the presence of a critical ipsilateral stenosis of the external carotid artery. EuroInterv 2008; 3: 588-592.
Coppi G,Moratto R,Silingardi R,Rubino P,Sarropago G,Salemme L,Cremonesi A,Castriota F,Manetti R,Sacca S,Reimers B. PRIAMUS-Proximal flow blockage cerebral protectIon during carotid stenting: Results from a multicenter Italian registry. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2005; 46: 219-227.
Hobson RW,Howard VJ,Roubin GS, et al.; for the CREST Investigators. Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 1106-1111.
Schmidt A,Diederich KW,Scheinert S,Bräunlich S,Olenburger T,Biamino G,Schuler G,Scheinert D. Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolization during carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1966-1969.
Randomized trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: Final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998; 351: 1379-1387.
Reimers B,Schlüter M,Castriota F,Tübler T,Corvaja N,Cernetti C,Manetti R,Picciolo A,Liistro F,Di Mario C,Cremonesi A,Schofer J,Colombo A. Routine use of cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: Results of a multicenter registry of 753 patients. Am J Med 2004; 116: 217-222.
Cremonesi A,Setacci C. SPACE and EVA-3S Trials: The need of standards for carotid stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 48-49
Bosiers M,de Donato G,Deloose K,Verbist J,Peeters P,Castriota F,Cremonesi A,Setacci C. Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 135-141; discussion 142-143.
Kastrup A,Gröschel K,Schnaudigel S,Nägele T,Schmidt F,Ernemann U. Target lesion ulceration and arch calcification are associated with increased incidence of carotid stenting-associated ischemic lesions in octogenarians. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 88-95.
Fisher ES,Malenka DJ,Solomon NA,Bubolz TA,Whaley FS,Wennberg JE. Risk of carotid endarterectomy in the elderly. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 1617-1620.
Reimers B,Sievert H,Schuler GC,Tubler T,Diederich K,Schmidt A,Rubino P,Mudra H,Dudek D,Coppi G,Schofer J,Cremonesi A,Haufe M,Resta M,Klauss V,Benassi A,Di Mario C,Favero L,Scheinert D,Salemme L,Biamino G. Proximal endovascular flow blockage for cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: Results from a prospective multicenter registry. J Endovasc Ther 2005; 12: 156-651.
Coggia M,Goeau-Brissonniere O,Duval JL,Leschi JP,Letort M,Nagel MD. Embolic risk of the different stages of carotid bifurcation balloon angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31: 550-557.
Brott T,Adams HP,Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864-870.
Yadav JS,Wholey MH,Kuntz RE,Fayad P,Katzen B,Mishkel G. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1493-1501.
Zahn R,Ischinger T,Hochadel M, et al. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: Results from the ALKK Carotid Artery Stent Registry. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 3705.
Shawl F,Kardo W,Domanski MJ,Lapentina FL,Ibal AA,Dougherty KG. Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1721-1728.
Diederich KW,Scheinert D,Schmidt A,Scheinert S,Reimers B,Sievert H,Rabe K,Coppi G,Moratto R,Hoffmann FJ,Schuler GC,Biamino G. First clinical experiences with an endovascular clamping system for neuroprotection during carotid stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 28: 629-633.
Setacci C,de Donato G,Chisci E,Setacci F,Pieraccini M,Cappelli A,Palasciano G,Castriota F,Cremonesi A, Is carotid artery stenting in octogenarians really dangerous? J Endovasc Ther 2006; 13: 302-309.
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborative Group. The final results of the NASCET trial. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1415-1425.
Biller HJ,Feinberg WM,Castaldo JE,Wittemore AD,Harbaugh RE,Dempsey RJ,Caplan LR,Kreskowik TF,Matchar DB,Toole JF,Easton JD,Adams HP,Brass LM,Hobson RW II,Brott TG,Sternau L. Guidelines for carotid endoarterectomy: A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the stroke council, American Heart Association. Circulation 1998; 97: 501-509.
Lam RC,Lin SC,DeRubertis B,Hynece KR,Kent KC,Faries PL. The impact of increasing age on anatomic factors affecting carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45: 1106-1111.
2004; 44
1998; 28
2004; 40
1989; 20
2006; 13
2004; 28
2006; 37
1998; 339
2005; 41
2008; 3
2007; 33
1998; 351
2005; 46
2007; 28
2004; 351
2004; 116
2000
2006; 43
2000; 35
2000; 31
2008; 47
2009; 2
1989; 79
2007; 45
1998; 97
2007; 46
2005; 12
e_1_2_6_30_2
Newcombe RG (e_1_2_6_23_2) 2000
e_1_2_6_18_2
e_1_2_6_19_2
(e_1_2_6_4_2) 1998; 351
e_1_2_6_12_2
e_1_2_6_13_2
Coppi G (e_1_2_6_20_2) 2005; 46
e_1_2_6_10_2
e_1_2_6_11_2
e_1_2_6_16_2
e_1_2_6_17_2
e_1_2_6_14_2
e_1_2_6_15_2
e_1_2_6_8_2
e_1_2_6_7_2
e_1_2_6_9_2
e_1_2_6_29_2
e_1_2_6_3_2
e_1_2_6_6_2
e_1_2_6_5_2
e_1_2_6_24_2
e_1_2_6_2_2
e_1_2_6_22_2
e_1_2_6_21_2
e_1_2_6_28_2
e_1_2_6_27_2
e_1_2_6_26_2
e_1_2_6_25_2
References_xml – volume: 33
  start-page: 135
  year: 2007
  end-page: 141
  article-title: Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting?
  publication-title: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
– volume: 33
  start-page: 48
  year: 2007
  end-page: 49
  article-title: SPACE and EVA‐3S Trials: The need of standards for carotid stenting
  publication-title: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
– volume: 37
  start-page: 2400
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2409
  article-title: Carotid artery stenting: First consensus document of the ICCS‐SPREAD Joint Committee
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 47
  start-page: 88
  year: 2008
  end-page: 95
  article-title: Target lesion ulceration and arch calcification are associated with increased incidence of carotid stenting‐associated ischemic lesions in octogenarians
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
– volume: 28
  start-page: 629
  year: 2004
  end-page: 633
  article-title: First clinical experiences with an endovascular clamping system for neuroprotection during carotid stenting
  publication-title: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1106
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1111
  article-title: The impact of increasing age on anatomic factors affecting carotid angioplasty and stenting
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
– start-page: 45
  year: 2000
  end-page: 56
– volume: 13
  start-page: 302
  year: 2006
  end-page: 309
  article-title: Is carotid artery stenting in octogenarians really dangerous?
  publication-title: J Endovasc Ther
– volume: 116
  start-page: 217
  year: 2004
  end-page: 222
  article-title: Routine use of cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: Results of a multicenter registry of 753 patients
  publication-title: Am J Med
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1106
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1111
  article-title: Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30‐day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead‐in phase
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
– volume: 3
  start-page: 588
  year: 2008
  end-page: 592
  article-title: Use of endovascular clamping as neuroprotection during carotid stenting in the presence of a critical ipsilateral stenosis of the external carotid artery
  publication-title: EuroInterv
– volume: 41
  start-page: 231
  year: 2005
  end-page: 237
  article-title: Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: Does increased age indicate “high risk”?
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
– volume: 79
  start-page: 1617
  year: 1989
  end-page: 1620
  article-title: Risk of carotid endarterectomy in the elderly
  publication-title: Am J Public Health
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1966
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1969
  article-title: Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolization during carotid artery stenting
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 43
  start-page: 297
  year: 2006
  end-page: 304
  article-title: Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians is associated with increased adverse outcomes
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
– volume: 339
  start-page: 1415
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1425
  article-title: The final results of the NASCET trial
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 20
  start-page: 864
  year: 1989
  end-page: 870
  article-title: Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 28
  start-page: 577
  year: 1998
  end-page: 584
  article-title: The impact of cardiac comorbidity after carotid endarterectomy
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
– volume: 351
  start-page: 1379
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1387
  article-title: Randomized trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: Final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST)
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 12
  start-page: 156
  year: 2005
  end-page: 651
  article-title: Proximal endovascular flow blockage for cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: Results from a prospective multicenter registry
  publication-title: J Endovasc Ther
– volume: 40
  start-page: 945
  year: 2004
  end-page: 951
  article-title: Comparison of angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection versus endarterectomy for treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis in elderly patients
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
– volume: 2
  start-page: 159
  year: 2009
  end-page: 166
  article-title: Thirty‐day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high‐surgical‐risk registries
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Interv
– volume: 46
  start-page: 219
  year: 2005
  end-page: 227
  article-title: PRIAMUS—Proximal flow blockage cerebral protectIon during carotid stenting: Results from a multicenter Italian registry
  publication-title: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)
– volume: 46
  start-page: 841
  year: 2007
  end-page: 845
  article-title: Increased aortic arch calcification in patients older than 75 years: Implications for carotid artery stenting in elderly patients
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
– volume: 31
  start-page: 550
  year: 2000
  end-page: 557
  article-title: Embolic risk of the different stages of carotid bifurcation balloon angioplasty
  publication-title: J Vasc Surg
– volume: 351
  start-page: 1493
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1501
  article-title: Protected carotid‐artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high‐risk patients
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 97
  start-page: 501
  year: 1998
  end-page: 509
  article-title: Guidelines for carotid endoarterectomy: A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the stroke council, American Heart Association
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1721
  year: 2000
  end-page: 1728
  article-title: Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high‐risk patients
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 28
  start-page: 3705
  year: 2007
  article-title: Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: Results from the ALKK Carotid Artery Stent Registry
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.059
– ident: e_1_2_6_29_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.043
– start-page: 45
  volume-title: Statistics With Confidence—Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_6_23_2
  contributor:
    fullname: Newcombe RG
– ident: e_1_2_6_27_2
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.5.501
– ident: e_1_2_6_28_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.049
– ident: e_1_2_6_17_2
  doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000236101.09480.b7
– ident: e_1_2_6_22_2
  doi: 10.1161/01.STR.20.7.864
– ident: e_1_2_6_19_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.08.012
– ident: e_1_2_6_3_2
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.045
– ident: e_1_2_6_5_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.11.021
– ident: e_1_2_6_25_2
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.79.12.1617
– ident: e_1_2_6_18_2
  doi: 10.4244/EIJV3I5A106
– volume: 46
  start-page: 219
  year: 2005
  ident: e_1_2_6_20_2
  article-title: PRIAMUS—Proximal flow blockage cerebral protectIon during carotid stenting: Results from a multicenter Italian registry
  publication-title: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)
  contributor:
    fullname: Coppi G
– ident: e_1_2_6_7_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.022
– ident: e_1_2_6_6_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.022
– ident: e_1_2_6_21_2
  doi: 10.1583/04-1400MR.1
– ident: e_1_2_6_12_2
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013
– ident: e_1_2_6_15_2
  doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.102730
– ident: e_1_2_6_8_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.062
– ident: e_1_2_6_30_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.019
– ident: e_1_2_6_10_2
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl421
– ident: e_1_2_6_9_2
  doi: 10.1583/06-1836.1
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_2
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040127
– volume: 351
  start-page: 1379
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_6_4_2
  article-title: Randomized trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: Final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST)
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09292-1
– ident: e_1_2_6_26_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70079-5
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00618-5
– ident: e_1_2_6_24_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.06.048
– ident: e_1_2_6_13_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.003
SSID ssj0009629
Score 2.1264377
Snippet Background: Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However,...
Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of...
Background : Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However,...
BACKGROUNDCarotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 9
SubjectTerms Age
Aged, 80 and over
Angioplasty - adverse effects
Angioplasty - instrumentation
Angioplasty - mortality
Balloon Occlusion - instrumentation
Cardiovascular system
carotid angioplasty
Carotid artery
carotid stenosis
Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis
Carotid Stenosis - mortality
Carotid Stenosis - therapy
Catheterization
Cerebral blood flow
cerebrovascular disease
Equipment Design
Female
Geriatrics
Heart
Humans
Intracranial Embolism - etiology
Intracranial Embolism - mortality
Intracranial Embolism - prevention & control
Ischemia
Italy
Linear Models
Logistic Models
Male
Neuroprotection
Patient Selection
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prospective Studies
Registries
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Stents
Stroke
Stroke - etiology
Stroke - prevention & control
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Title Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians using a proximal endovascular occlusion cerebral protection device: A multicenter registry
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-ZVFVFNC2-L/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fccd.22503
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20578188
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1238121585
https://search.proquest.com/docview/733568157
Volume 76
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1La9wwEB7aBEIvzatNnBdKCaEXN7YkP7Y5hU22ObRLIWlaehF6OSxNvWUfkJzzxzsj7zoEEij0ZoxsD9LI84306RuAAysNpsZOxiaVmKBgAIkNtzrOS51XHYlzs6IFt_OLov-jPD0jmZzj-VmYRh-iXXCjmRH-1zTBtRkfPYiGWus-oDMGpU_MEsLxDfH1QXA3DxXKMDzxGK3J56pCCT9qn3wUixapW2-fApqPcWsIPL3l_zJ5BV7P8CY7aRxkFV74eg2Wvsx21Nfhnhgfk4Fjgdt5x9C6UDuCDWo2tJMh-hdm0xjPGDHkr5lmRHwZ_MZ3-tq1RFZsa2-mtPLGrB_RZvQNm0lA0D3n6Yf0kZ2wQGAkRqgfMSoKQbXm3sC33tll9zyeFWaIrcTwHxfcJ8aLknckqcvwXDhEkjqx0me2khT5jHDCFNoZoXWaVS61lfNpYkRZVpl4Cwv1sPabwCqOGaj1Ljcka4P4oZRVIqRzQtiOcGUE7-ZDpP40-huqUVrmCrtThe6M4DAMXttCj34RYa3I1Pf-J_XzqnfV63e5-hzB_nx0FU4j2hvRtR9Oxyol6ILwp8wiYM-0KYQgubasiGCj8Yz2gxxhL0IfNPd9cIDnbVXd7mm42Pr3ptvwqiEtEEt4BxYmo6nfhZdjN90LTv8Xb1cDgw
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,1408,27933,27934,46064,46488
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS9xAEB9ahdaX2k-Nte22lNKX1GR383HFFzm9Xul5FGpVfFn2K3KouXLegX32H-_M5i4iVCj0LYRNMuzOZH67-9vfALy30uDU2MnYpBInKJhAYsOtjvNS51VHYmxWtODW_1EMj8vdPZLJ2V6chWn0IdoFN4qM8L-mAKcF6a0b1VBr3Sf0RpL6XJY5OiId4BDfbyR381CjDBMUj9GefKErlPCt9tFb2WiZOvbqb1DzNnINqae3-n9GP4ZHc8jJdhofeQL3fP0UHuzPN9WfwTWRPqYjxwK98zdD80L5CDaq2dhOx-hiOKHGlMaIJH_KNCPuy-gC3-lr13JZsa09n9HiG7N-QvvR52yuAkH3nKd_0me2wwKHkUihfsKoLgSVm3sOP3t7B91-PK_NEFuJCCAuuE-MFyXvSBKY4blwCCZ1YqXPbCUp-RnhhCm0M0LrNKtcaivn08SIsqwy8QKW6nHt14FVHCeh1rvckLINQohSVomQzglhO8KVEbxbjJH61UhwqEZsmSvsThW6M4IPYfTaFnpyRpy1IlNHwy_q5LB32Bt2uRpE8HYxvAojibZHdO3Hs0uVEnpBBFRmEbA72hRCkGJbVkSw1rhG-0GOyBfRD5r7MXjA3baqbnc3XGz8e9M38LB_sD9Qg6_Dby9hpeEwEGl4E5amk5l_Bfcv3ex1iIA_x_MHqw
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9RAEB-0heKLrd-pVVcR8SU22d18nD6Vu8aK9Siotfiy7Kcc1ly53oE--487s7lLKVgQfAthkwy7Mzu_3f3lNwDPrTS4NHYyNbnEBQomkNRwq9Oy1mUYSIzNQBtuBx-r8Uk92ieZnDerf2E6fYh-w40iI87XFOBnLuxeiIZa616hM5LS57pEGE7C-UIcXSjulrFEGeYnnqI55UpWKOO7_aOXktE69evPvyHNy8A1Zp5m879s3oKbS8DJ9joPuQXXfHsbNj4sj9TvwG-ifMwnjkVy5y-G1sXiEWzSsqmdT9HBcDmNCY0RRf4b04yYL5Mf-E7fup7Jim3t6YK23pj1MzqNPmVLDQi65zzNSK_ZHosMRqKE-hmjqhBUbO4ufG72Pw0P0mVlhtRKzP9pxX1mvKj5QJK8DC-FQyipMyt9YYOk1GeEE6bSzgit8yK43Abn88yIug6FuAdr7bT1D4AFjktQ611pSNcGAUQtQyakc0LYgXB1As9WQ6TOOgEO1Uktc4XdqWJ3JvAiDl7fQs--E2OtKtSX8Vv19bg5bsZDrg4TeLoaXYVxRIcjuvXTxbnKCbsg_qmLBNgVbSohSK-tqBK433lG_0GOuBexD5r7MjrA1baq4XAUL7b_vekT2DgaNerw3fj9Q7jRERiIMbwDa_PZwj-C6-du8Tj6_x-QtQZR
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carotid+artery+stenting+in+octogenarians+using+a+proximal+endovascular+occlusion+cerebral+protection+device%3A+A+multicenter+registry&rft.jtitle=Catheterization+and+cardiovascular+interventions&rft.au=Micari%2C+Antonio&rft.au=Stabile%2C+Eugenio&rft.au=Cremonesi%2C+Alberto&rft.au=Vadal%C3%A0%2C+Giuseppe&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc.%2C+A+Wiley+Company&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=15&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fccd.22503&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fccd.22503&rft.externalDocID=CCD22503
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1522-1946&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1522-1946&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1522-1946&client=summon