Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians using a proximal endovascular occlusion cerebral protection device: A multicenter registry
Background: Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians. Purpose: The aim of this multicenter prospective registry...
Saved in:
Published in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions Vol. 76; no. 1; pp. 9 - 15 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01-07-2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Background: Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians. Purpose: The aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high‐volume centers by experienced operators. Methods: From July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days. Results: 198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In‐hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device‐related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30‐day follow‐up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30‐day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients (P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender. Conclusion: This multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians.
The aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high-volume centers by experienced operators.
From July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days.
198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In-hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device-related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30-day follow-up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30-day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients (P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender.
This multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines. Background : Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians. Purpose : The aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high‐volume centers by experienced operators. Methods : From July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days. Results : 198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In‐hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device‐related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30‐day follow‐up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30‐day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients ( P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender. Conclusion : This multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Background: Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians. Purpose: The aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high-volume centers by experienced operators. Methods: From July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days. Results: 198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In-hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device-related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30-day follow-up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30-day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients (P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender. Conclusion: This multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines. [copy 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Background: Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians. Purpose: The aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high‐volume centers by experienced operators. Methods: From July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days. Results: 198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In‐hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device‐related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30‐day follow‐up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30‐day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients (P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender. Conclusion: This multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. BACKGROUNDCarotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of proximal neuroprotection devices have not been evaluated in octogenarians.PURPOSEThe aim of this multicenter prospective registry was to demonstrate that CAS in octogenarians is safe and effective if performed in high-volume centers by experienced operators.METHODSFrom July 2005 to May 2009, a total of 198 octogenarians patients, in three different institutions, were included in this registry. All patients underwent CAS using proximal endovascular occlusion device (Mo.Ma. device Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). An independent neurologist evaluated all patients. The primary endpoint was death and stroke rate at 30 days.RESULTS198 octogenarians (135 men; mean age: 83.2 years) were included in the registry. 39.4% of the patients were symptomatic. Procedural success was 100%. In-hospital complications: Two minor and two major strokes (2.02%) occurred. No device-related complications and no serious access site complication were noted. Between discharge and 30-day follow-up, one patient died due to a cardiac arrest. The overall 30-day combined stroke/death rate was 2.52%, resulting in 1.61% event incidence in asymptomatic and 3.9% in symptomatic patients (P = ns). Logistic regression did not identify independent predictor of neurological events, except in the female gender.CONCLUSIONThis multicenter prospective registry shows that CAS performed with proximal flow blockage is safe and feasible also in octogenarians. Thirty days death/stroke rates are similar to those of the overall population and within the International guidelines. |
Author | Sorropago, Giovanni Stabile, Eugenio Pernice, Vincenzo Rubino, Paolo Cremonesi, Alberto Vadalà, Giuseppe Castriota, Fausto Micari, Antonio Biamino, Giancarlo |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Antonio surname: Micari fullname: Micari, Antonio email: antoniomicari@tiscali.it organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Palermo, Italy – sequence: 2 givenname: Eugenio surname: Stabile fullname: Stabile, Eugenio organization: Cardiology Unit, Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano (AV), Italy – sequence: 3 givenname: Alberto surname: Cremonesi fullname: Cremonesi, Alberto organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Cotignola (RA), Italy – sequence: 4 givenname: Giuseppe surname: Vadalà fullname: Vadalà, Giuseppe organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Palermo, Italy – sequence: 5 givenname: Fausto surname: Castriota fullname: Castriota, Fausto organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Lecce, Italy – sequence: 6 givenname: Vincenzo surname: Pernice fullname: Pernice, Vincenzo organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Palermo, Italy – sequence: 7 givenname: Giovanni surname: Sorropago fullname: Sorropago, Giovanni organization: Cardiology Unit, Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano (AV), Italy – sequence: 8 givenname: Paolo surname: Rubino fullname: Rubino, Paolo organization: Cardiology Unit, Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano (AV), Italy – sequence: 9 givenname: Giancarlo surname: Biamino fullname: Biamino, Giancarlo organization: Cardiology Unit, GVM Care and Research, Palermo, Italy |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20578188$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kT1vFDEQhi2UiHxAwR9A7iDFJf5Y73rpoiUXIp2SBgKisbz27MmwZwfbG3I1fxwfd0kXqhmNn3nHM-8R2vPBA0JvKDmlhLAzY-wpY4LwF-iQCsZmDau_7e1y2lb1ATpK6QchpK1Z-xIdMCIaSaU8RH86HUN2FuuYIa5xyuCz80vsPA4mhyV4HZ32CU9pU9b4LoYHt9IjBm_DvU5mGnUsrBkLETw2EKGP5b2AGUze1CzcOwMf8DleTWMuqS_DcISlSzmuX6H9QY8JXu_iMfoyv_jcfZotbi6vuvPFzFQ15WUpID1wydqqaivJam4J5ZqYCoQZKkJo03PL-0bbnmtNxWCpGSxQ0nMpB8GP0butbvnZrwlSViuXDIyj9hCmpBrORS2paAr5_r8kZVxSRoXciJ5sURNDShEGdRfLeeJaUaI27qjijvrnTmHf7mSnfgX2iXy0owBnW-C3G2H9vJLquo-PkrNtR7kkPDx16PhT1Q1vhPp6fam-385v59cdUwv-F6n8rLw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_ccd_25025 crossref_primary_10_3171_2013_5_JNS1331 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00392_012_0479_4 crossref_primary_10_5797_jnet_or_13041 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2019_04_187 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2011_00635_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_avsg_2012_09_020 crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_111_624155 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12265_014_9567_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acvfr_2011_12_014 crossref_primary_10_3174_ajnr_A5103 crossref_primary_10_4244_EIJV7I7A129 crossref_primary_10_1111_joic_12037 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00701_012_1508_9 crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_110_596833 crossref_primary_10_1590_0100_69912014005003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_avsg_2010_12_001 crossref_primary_10_1002_ccd_24984 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00772_012_1064_x |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.059 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.043 10.1161/01.CIR.97.5.501 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.049 10.1161/01.STR.0000236101.09480.b7 10.1161/01.STR.20.7.864 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.08.012 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.045 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.11.021 10.2105/AJPH.79.12.1617 10.4244/EIJV3I5A106 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.022 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.022 10.1583/04-1400MR.1 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013 10.1067/mva.2000.102730 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.062 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.019 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl421 10.1583/06-1836.1 10.1056/NEJMoa040127 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09292-1 10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70079-5 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00618-5 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.06.048 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.003 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. – notice: (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
DBID | BSCLL CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7TK 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1002/ccd.22503 |
DatabaseName | Istex Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE CrossRef Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1522-726X |
EndPage | 15 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1002_ccd_22503 20578188 CCD22503 ark_67375_WNG_ZVFVFNC2_L |
Genre | article Multicenter Study Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Italy |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Italy |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OC 29B 31~ 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 5GY 5RE 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AAQQT AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFZJQ AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.X HBH HF~ HGLYW HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M JPC KBYEO KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K ROL RWI RX1 SUPJJ TEORI UB1 V2E W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WJL WOHZO WQJ WRC WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 XPP XV2 ~IA ~WT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM .GJ 53G AAMNL AAYXX CITATION EBD EMOBN SV3 ZGI 7TK 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-72e0be382944948263d013a0c4e5cf40017b3d3b7adb3aa15fd1cfde10b388f53 |
IEDL.DBID | 33P |
ISSN | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
IngestDate | Sat Aug 17 01:45:39 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 16 23:57:59 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 21 20:43:33 EST 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:47:00 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:59:10 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 30 09:51:55 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4613-72e0be382944948263d013a0c4e5cf40017b3d3b7adb3aa15fd1cfde10b388f53 |
Notes | ArticleID:CCD22503 ark:/67375/WNG-ZVFVFNC2-L istex:849DD4FD0E729C2F37BAFFB2174A28D7B6B56A71 Conflict of interest: No conflicts of interest exist, with exception of Prof G. Biamino, who is scientific consulting of Invatec. ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
PMID | 20578188 |
PQID | 1238121585 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_733568157 proquest_miscellaneous_1238121585 crossref_primary_10_1002_ccd_22503 pubmed_primary_20578188 wiley_primary_10_1002_ccd_22503_CCD22503 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_ZVFVFNC2_L |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 1 July 2010 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2010 text: 1 July 2010 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Hoboken |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent |
PublicationYear | 2010 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company |
References | Gray W,Chaturvedi S,Verta P; on behalf of the Investigators and the Executive Committees. Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 159-166. Miller MT,Comerota AJ,Tzilinis A,Daoud Y,Hammerling J. Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: Does increased age indicate "high risk"? J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 231-237. Estes JM,Guadagnoli E,Wolf R,Logerfo FW,Whittemore AD. The impact of cardiac comorbidity after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28: 577-584. Kastrup A,Schulz JB,Raygrotzki S,Gröschel K,Ernemann U. Comparison of angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection versus endarterectomy for treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis in elderly patients. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 945-951. Stanziale SF,Luke M,Boules Tn,Brimmeier JA,Hill K,Makaroun MS. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians is associated with increased adverse outcomes. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43: 297-304. Hernan AB,Sanjeev P,Hamid M,Tassos K,Alan D. Increased aortic arch calcification in patients older than 75 years: Implications for carotid artery stenting in elderly patients. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 841-845. Cremonesi A,Setacci C,Bignamini A,Bolognese L,Briganti F,Di Sciascio G,Inzitari D,Lanza G,Lupattelli L,Mangiafico S,Pratesi C,Reimers B,Ricci S,de Donato G,Ugolotti U,Zaninelli A,Gensini GF. Carotid artery stenting: First consensus document of the ICCS-SPREAD Joint Committee. Stroke 2006; 37: 2400-2409. Stabile E,Sorropago G,Tesorio T,Salemme L,Ambrosini V,Cioppa A,Popusoi G,Nammas W,Biamino G,Rubino P. Use of endovascular clamping as neuroprotection during carotid stenting in the presence of a critical ipsilateral stenosis of the external carotid artery. EuroInterv 2008; 3: 588-592. Coppi G,Moratto R,Silingardi R,Rubino P,Sarropago G,Salemme L,Cremonesi A,Castriota F,Manetti R,Sacca S,Reimers B. PRIAMUS-Proximal flow blockage cerebral protectIon during carotid stenting: Results from a multicenter Italian registry. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2005; 46: 219-227. Hobson RW,Howard VJ,Roubin GS, et al.; for the CREST Investigators. Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 1106-1111. Schmidt A,Diederich KW,Scheinert S,Bräunlich S,Olenburger T,Biamino G,Schuler G,Scheinert D. Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolization during carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1966-1969. Randomized trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: Final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998; 351: 1379-1387. Reimers B,Schlüter M,Castriota F,Tübler T,Corvaja N,Cernetti C,Manetti R,Picciolo A,Liistro F,Di Mario C,Cremonesi A,Schofer J,Colombo A. Routine use of cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: Results of a multicenter registry of 753 patients. Am J Med 2004; 116: 217-222. Cremonesi A,Setacci C. SPACE and EVA-3S Trials: The need of standards for carotid stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 48-49 Bosiers M,de Donato G,Deloose K,Verbist J,Peeters P,Castriota F,Cremonesi A,Setacci C. Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 135-141; discussion 142-143. Kastrup A,Gröschel K,Schnaudigel S,Nägele T,Schmidt F,Ernemann U. Target lesion ulceration and arch calcification are associated with increased incidence of carotid stenting-associated ischemic lesions in octogenarians. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 88-95. Fisher ES,Malenka DJ,Solomon NA,Bubolz TA,Whaley FS,Wennberg JE. Risk of carotid endarterectomy in the elderly. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 1617-1620. Reimers B,Sievert H,Schuler GC,Tubler T,Diederich K,Schmidt A,Rubino P,Mudra H,Dudek D,Coppi G,Schofer J,Cremonesi A,Haufe M,Resta M,Klauss V,Benassi A,Di Mario C,Favero L,Scheinert D,Salemme L,Biamino G. Proximal endovascular flow blockage for cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: Results from a prospective multicenter registry. J Endovasc Ther 2005; 12: 156-651. Coggia M,Goeau-Brissonniere O,Duval JL,Leschi JP,Letort M,Nagel MD. Embolic risk of the different stages of carotid bifurcation balloon angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31: 550-557. Brott T,Adams HP,Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864-870. Yadav JS,Wholey MH,Kuntz RE,Fayad P,Katzen B,Mishkel G. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1493-1501. Zahn R,Ischinger T,Hochadel M, et al. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: Results from the ALKK Carotid Artery Stent Registry. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 3705. Shawl F,Kardo W,Domanski MJ,Lapentina FL,Ibal AA,Dougherty KG. Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1721-1728. Diederich KW,Scheinert D,Schmidt A,Scheinert S,Reimers B,Sievert H,Rabe K,Coppi G,Moratto R,Hoffmann FJ,Schuler GC,Biamino G. First clinical experiences with an endovascular clamping system for neuroprotection during carotid stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 28: 629-633. Setacci C,de Donato G,Chisci E,Setacci F,Pieraccini M,Cappelli A,Palasciano G,Castriota F,Cremonesi A, Is carotid artery stenting in octogenarians really dangerous? J Endovasc Ther 2006; 13: 302-309. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborative Group. The final results of the NASCET trial. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1415-1425. Biller HJ,Feinberg WM,Castaldo JE,Wittemore AD,Harbaugh RE,Dempsey RJ,Caplan LR,Kreskowik TF,Matchar DB,Toole JF,Easton JD,Adams HP,Brass LM,Hobson RW II,Brott TG,Sternau L. Guidelines for carotid endoarterectomy: A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the stroke council, American Heart Association. Circulation 1998; 97: 501-509. Lam RC,Lin SC,DeRubertis B,Hynece KR,Kent KC,Faries PL. The impact of increasing age on anatomic factors affecting carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45: 1106-1111. 2004; 44 1998; 28 2004; 40 1989; 20 2006; 13 2004; 28 2006; 37 1998; 339 2005; 41 2008; 3 2007; 33 1998; 351 2005; 46 2007; 28 2004; 351 2004; 116 2000 2006; 43 2000; 35 2000; 31 2008; 47 2009; 2 1989; 79 2007; 45 1998; 97 2007; 46 2005; 12 e_1_2_6_30_2 Newcombe RG (e_1_2_6_23_2) 2000 e_1_2_6_18_2 e_1_2_6_19_2 (e_1_2_6_4_2) 1998; 351 e_1_2_6_12_2 e_1_2_6_13_2 Coppi G (e_1_2_6_20_2) 2005; 46 e_1_2_6_10_2 e_1_2_6_11_2 e_1_2_6_16_2 e_1_2_6_17_2 e_1_2_6_14_2 e_1_2_6_15_2 e_1_2_6_8_2 e_1_2_6_7_2 e_1_2_6_9_2 e_1_2_6_29_2 e_1_2_6_3_2 e_1_2_6_6_2 e_1_2_6_5_2 e_1_2_6_24_2 e_1_2_6_2_2 e_1_2_6_22_2 e_1_2_6_21_2 e_1_2_6_28_2 e_1_2_6_27_2 e_1_2_6_26_2 e_1_2_6_25_2 |
References_xml | – volume: 33 start-page: 135 year: 2007 end-page: 141 article-title: Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? publication-title: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg – volume: 33 start-page: 48 year: 2007 end-page: 49 article-title: SPACE and EVA‐3S Trials: The need of standards for carotid stenting publication-title: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg – volume: 37 start-page: 2400 year: 2006 end-page: 2409 article-title: Carotid artery stenting: First consensus document of the ICCS‐SPREAD Joint Committee publication-title: Stroke – volume: 47 start-page: 88 year: 2008 end-page: 95 article-title: Target lesion ulceration and arch calcification are associated with increased incidence of carotid stenting‐associated ischemic lesions in octogenarians publication-title: J Vasc Surg – volume: 28 start-page: 629 year: 2004 end-page: 633 article-title: First clinical experiences with an endovascular clamping system for neuroprotection during carotid stenting publication-title: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg – volume: 45 start-page: 1106 year: 2007 end-page: 1111 article-title: The impact of increasing age on anatomic factors affecting carotid angioplasty and stenting publication-title: J Vasc Surg – start-page: 45 year: 2000 end-page: 56 – volume: 13 start-page: 302 year: 2006 end-page: 309 article-title: Is carotid artery stenting in octogenarians really dangerous? publication-title: J Endovasc Ther – volume: 116 start-page: 217 year: 2004 end-page: 222 article-title: Routine use of cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: Results of a multicenter registry of 753 patients publication-title: Am J Med – volume: 40 start-page: 1106 year: 2004 end-page: 1111 article-title: Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30‐day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead‐in phase publication-title: J Vasc Surg – volume: 3 start-page: 588 year: 2008 end-page: 592 article-title: Use of endovascular clamping as neuroprotection during carotid stenting in the presence of a critical ipsilateral stenosis of the external carotid artery publication-title: EuroInterv – volume: 41 start-page: 231 year: 2005 end-page: 237 article-title: Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: Does increased age indicate “high risk”? publication-title: J Vasc Surg – volume: 79 start-page: 1617 year: 1989 end-page: 1620 article-title: Risk of carotid endarterectomy in the elderly publication-title: Am J Public Health – volume: 44 start-page: 1966 year: 2004 end-page: 1969 article-title: Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolization during carotid artery stenting publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 43 start-page: 297 year: 2006 end-page: 304 article-title: Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians is associated with increased adverse outcomes publication-title: J Vasc Surg – volume: 339 start-page: 1415 year: 1998 end-page: 1425 article-title: The final results of the NASCET trial publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 20 start-page: 864 year: 1989 end-page: 870 article-title: Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale publication-title: Stroke – volume: 28 start-page: 577 year: 1998 end-page: 584 article-title: The impact of cardiac comorbidity after carotid endarterectomy publication-title: J Vasc Surg – volume: 351 start-page: 1379 year: 1998 end-page: 1387 article-title: Randomized trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: Final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) publication-title: Lancet – volume: 12 start-page: 156 year: 2005 end-page: 651 article-title: Proximal endovascular flow blockage for cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: Results from a prospective multicenter registry publication-title: J Endovasc Ther – volume: 40 start-page: 945 year: 2004 end-page: 951 article-title: Comparison of angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection versus endarterectomy for treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis in elderly patients publication-title: J Vasc Surg – volume: 2 start-page: 159 year: 2009 end-page: 166 article-title: Thirty‐day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high‐surgical‐risk registries publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Interv – volume: 46 start-page: 219 year: 2005 end-page: 227 article-title: PRIAMUS—Proximal flow blockage cerebral protectIon during carotid stenting: Results from a multicenter Italian registry publication-title: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) – volume: 46 start-page: 841 year: 2007 end-page: 845 article-title: Increased aortic arch calcification in patients older than 75 years: Implications for carotid artery stenting in elderly patients publication-title: J Vasc Surg – volume: 31 start-page: 550 year: 2000 end-page: 557 article-title: Embolic risk of the different stages of carotid bifurcation balloon angioplasty publication-title: J Vasc Surg – volume: 351 start-page: 1493 year: 2004 end-page: 1501 article-title: Protected carotid‐artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high‐risk patients publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 97 start-page: 501 year: 1998 end-page: 509 article-title: Guidelines for carotid endoarterectomy: A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the stroke council, American Heart Association publication-title: Circulation – volume: 35 start-page: 1721 year: 2000 end-page: 1728 article-title: Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high‐risk patients publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 28 start-page: 3705 year: 2007 article-title: Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: Results from the ALKK Carotid Artery Stent Registry publication-title: Eur Heart J – ident: e_1_2_6_16_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.059 – ident: e_1_2_6_29_2 doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.043 – start-page: 45 volume-title: Statistics With Confidence—Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_6_23_2 contributor: fullname: Newcombe RG – ident: e_1_2_6_27_2 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.5.501 – ident: e_1_2_6_28_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.049 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_2 doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000236101.09480.b7 – ident: e_1_2_6_22_2 doi: 10.1161/01.STR.20.7.864 – ident: e_1_2_6_19_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.08.012 – ident: e_1_2_6_3_2 doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.045 – ident: e_1_2_6_5_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.11.021 – ident: e_1_2_6_25_2 doi: 10.2105/AJPH.79.12.1617 – ident: e_1_2_6_18_2 doi: 10.4244/EIJV3I5A106 – volume: 46 start-page: 219 year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_6_20_2 article-title: PRIAMUS—Proximal flow blockage cerebral protectIon during carotid stenting: Results from a multicenter Italian registry publication-title: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) contributor: fullname: Coppi G – ident: e_1_2_6_7_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.022 – ident: e_1_2_6_6_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.022 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_2 doi: 10.1583/04-1400MR.1 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_2 doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013 – ident: e_1_2_6_15_2 doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.102730 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.062 – ident: e_1_2_6_30_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.019 – ident: e_1_2_6_10_2 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl421 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_2 doi: 10.1583/06-1836.1 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_2 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040127 – volume: 351 start-page: 1379 year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_6_4_2 article-title: Randomized trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: Final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09292-1 – ident: e_1_2_6_26_2 doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70079-5 – ident: e_1_2_6_11_2 doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00618-5 – ident: e_1_2_6_24_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.06.048 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.003 |
SSID | ssj0009629 |
Score | 2.1264377 |
Snippet | Background: Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However,... Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the use of... Background : Carotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However,... BACKGROUNDCarotid stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to carotid endoarterectomy also in elderly patients with discrepant results. However, the... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 9 |
SubjectTerms | Age Aged, 80 and over Angioplasty - adverse effects Angioplasty - instrumentation Angioplasty - mortality Balloon Occlusion - instrumentation Cardiovascular system carotid angioplasty Carotid artery carotid stenosis Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis Carotid Stenosis - mortality Carotid Stenosis - therapy Catheterization Cerebral blood flow cerebrovascular disease Equipment Design Female Geriatrics Heart Humans Intracranial Embolism - etiology Intracranial Embolism - mortality Intracranial Embolism - prevention & control Ischemia Italy Linear Models Logistic Models Male Neuroprotection Patient Selection Practice Guidelines as Topic Prospective Studies Registries Risk Assessment Severity of Illness Index Stents Stroke Stroke - etiology Stroke - prevention & control Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
Title | Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians using a proximal endovascular occlusion cerebral protection device: A multicenter registry |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-ZVFVFNC2-L/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fccd.22503 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20578188 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1238121585 https://search.proquest.com/docview/733568157 |
Volume | 76 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1La9wwEB7aBEIvzatNnBdKCaEXN7YkP7Y5hU22ObRLIWlaehF6OSxNvWUfkJzzxzsj7zoEEij0ZoxsD9LI84306RuAAysNpsZOxiaVmKBgAIkNtzrOS51XHYlzs6IFt_OLov-jPD0jmZzj-VmYRh-iXXCjmRH-1zTBtRkfPYiGWus-oDMGpU_MEsLxDfH1QXA3DxXKMDzxGK3J56pCCT9qn3wUixapW2-fApqPcWsIPL3l_zJ5BV7P8CY7aRxkFV74eg2Wvsx21Nfhnhgfk4Fjgdt5x9C6UDuCDWo2tJMh-hdm0xjPGDHkr5lmRHwZ_MZ3-tq1RFZsa2-mtPLGrB_RZvQNm0lA0D3n6Yf0kZ2wQGAkRqgfMSoKQbXm3sC33tll9zyeFWaIrcTwHxfcJ8aLknckqcvwXDhEkjqx0me2khT5jHDCFNoZoXWaVS61lfNpYkRZVpl4Cwv1sPabwCqOGaj1Ljcka4P4oZRVIqRzQtiOcGUE7-ZDpP40-huqUVrmCrtThe6M4DAMXttCj34RYa3I1Pf-J_XzqnfV63e5-hzB_nx0FU4j2hvRtR9Oxyol6ILwp8wiYM-0KYQgubasiGCj8Yz2gxxhL0IfNPd9cIDnbVXd7mm42Pr3ptvwqiEtEEt4BxYmo6nfhZdjN90LTv8Xb1cDgw |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,1408,27933,27934,46064,46488 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS9xAEB9ahdaX2k-Nte22lNKX1GR383HFFzm9Xul5FGpVfFn2K3KouXLegX32H-_M5i4iVCj0LYRNMuzOZH67-9vfALy30uDU2MnYpBInKJhAYsOtjvNS51VHYmxWtODW_1EMj8vdPZLJ2V6chWn0IdoFN4qM8L-mAKcF6a0b1VBr3Sf0RpL6XJY5OiId4BDfbyR381CjDBMUj9GefKErlPCt9tFb2WiZOvbqb1DzNnINqae3-n9GP4ZHc8jJdhofeQL3fP0UHuzPN9WfwTWRPqYjxwK98zdD80L5CDaq2dhOx-hiOKHGlMaIJH_KNCPuy-gC3-lr13JZsa09n9HiG7N-QvvR52yuAkH3nKd_0me2wwKHkUihfsKoLgSVm3sOP3t7B91-PK_NEFuJCCAuuE-MFyXvSBKY4blwCCZ1YqXPbCUp-RnhhCm0M0LrNKtcaivn08SIsqwy8QKW6nHt14FVHCeh1rvckLINQohSVomQzglhO8KVEbxbjJH61UhwqEZsmSvsThW6M4IPYfTaFnpyRpy1IlNHwy_q5LB32Bt2uRpE8HYxvAojibZHdO3Hs0uVEnpBBFRmEbA72hRCkGJbVkSw1rhG-0GOyBfRD5r7MXjA3baqbnc3XGz8e9M38LB_sD9Qg6_Dby9hpeEwEGl4E5amk5l_Bfcv3ex1iIA_x_MHqw |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9RAEB-0heKLrd-pVVcR8SU22d18nD6Vu8aK9Siotfiy7Kcc1ly53oE--487s7lLKVgQfAthkwy7Mzu_3f3lNwDPrTS4NHYyNbnEBQomkNRwq9Oy1mUYSIzNQBtuBx-r8Uk92ieZnDerf2E6fYh-w40iI87XFOBnLuxeiIZa616hM5LS57pEGE7C-UIcXSjulrFEGeYnnqI55UpWKOO7_aOXktE69evPvyHNy8A1Zp5m879s3oKbS8DJ9joPuQXXfHsbNj4sj9TvwG-ifMwnjkVy5y-G1sXiEWzSsqmdT9HBcDmNCY0RRf4b04yYL5Mf-E7fup7Jim3t6YK23pj1MzqNPmVLDQi65zzNSK_ZHosMRqKE-hmjqhBUbO4ufG72Pw0P0mVlhtRKzP9pxX1mvKj5QJK8DC-FQyipMyt9YYOk1GeEE6bSzgit8yK43Abn88yIug6FuAdr7bT1D4AFjktQ611pSNcGAUQtQyakc0LYgXB1As9WQ6TOOgEO1Uktc4XdqWJ3JvAiDl7fQs--E2OtKtSX8Vv19bg5bsZDrg4TeLoaXYVxRIcjuvXTxbnKCbsg_qmLBNgVbSohSK-tqBK433lG_0GOuBexD5r7MjrA1baq4XAUL7b_vekT2DgaNerw3fj9Q7jRERiIMbwDa_PZwj-C6-du8Tj6_x-QtQZR |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carotid+artery+stenting+in+octogenarians+using+a+proximal+endovascular+occlusion+cerebral+protection+device%3A+A+multicenter+registry&rft.jtitle=Catheterization+and+cardiovascular+interventions&rft.au=Micari%2C+Antonio&rft.au=Stabile%2C+Eugenio&rft.au=Cremonesi%2C+Alberto&rft.au=Vadal%C3%A0%2C+Giuseppe&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc.%2C+A+Wiley+Company&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=15&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fccd.22503&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fccd.22503&rft.externalDocID=CCD22503 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1522-1946&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1522-1946&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1522-1946&client=summon |