Direct measurement of mucosal pressures exerted by cuff and non-cuff portions of tracheal tubes with different cuff volumes and head and neck positions

• Published in: British Journal of Anaesthesia Vol. 82; no. 5; pp. 708 - 711
• Main Authors: Brimacombe, J, Keller, C, Giampalmo, M, Sparr, H J, Berry, A
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01-05-1999; Oxford University Press; Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
• Subjects: Adult; Anesthesia; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy; Biological and medical sciences; Female; General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods; Male; Medical sciences; Mucous Membrane - physiology; Neck - anatomy & histology; Pressure; Space life sciences; Trachea - physiology; Human; Head; Mucosa; Cuffed tube; General anesthesia; Pressure; Cuff; Volume; Complication; Neck; Intubation; Measurement method; Patient position; Trachea
• ISSN: 0007-0912; 1471-6771
• DOI: 10.1093/bja/82.5.708

We measured directly mucosal pressures against the cuff and non-cuff portions of the tracheal tube in different head-neck positions and tested the reliability of calculated mucosal pressures, in vivo intracuff pressures and cuff volume as determinants of directly measured mucosal pressures. We studied 10 anaesthetized, paralysed adult patients. An 8.5-mm, high volume, low pressure PVC tracheal tube was used. Microchip sensors were attached to three cuff locations (anterior, lateral and posterior) and two non-cuff locations (anterior tip and anterior aspect of the tube, 5 cm proximal to the cuff). Directly measured mucosal pressures, in vivo intracuff pressures and calculated mucosal pressures (in vivo minus in vitro intracuff pressures) were determined after brief inflation (< 15 s) to 0, 5, 10 and 15 ml. In vivo intracuff pressures were then set at 30 mm Hg and the measurements repeated, first in the neutral position and then with the head-neck extended, flexed and rotated. Cuff mucosal pressures were highest anteriorly and lowest posteriorly. Non-cuff mucosal pressures did not vary with cuff volume and were approximately 15 mm Hg. Compared with the neutral position, in vivo intracuff pressures were higher in the rotated, extended and flexed positions. Compared with the neutral position, mucosal pressure increased on the anterior aspect of the tube in the flexed position by 22 mm Hg (P = 0.003), at the anterior tip in the extended position by 11 mm Hg (P = 0.002) and at the anterior tip (5 mm Hg, P = 0.05) and lateral aspect of the cuff (5 mm Hg, P = 0.03) in the rotated position. In vivo intracuff pressures and calculated mucosal pressures were moderate predictors of measured mucosal pressures; cuff volume was a poor predictor. We conclude that tracheal mucosal pressures were highest anteriorly, that non-cuff portions of the tube exerted substantial mucosal pressures and that the rotated position caused a greater increase in tracheal mucosal pressure than the extended or flexed position. Indirect methods of measuring mucosal pressure were of moderate predictive value.