Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials

• Published in: Frontiers in oncology Vol. 7; p. 221
• Main Authors: Chang, Amy Tien Yee, Tan, Li Tee, Duke, Simon, Ng, Wai-Tong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 25-09-2017
• Subjects: clinical trial; contouring guidelines; education program; Oncology; peer review; target volume delineation variability; clinical trial; contouring guidelines; peer review; target volume delineation variability; education program
• DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00221
• EISSN: 2234-943X

In recent years, new radiotherapy techniques have emerged that aim to improve treatment outcome and reduce toxicity. The standard method of evaluating such techniques is to conduct large scale multicenter clinical trials, often across continents. A major challenge for such trials is quality assurance to ensure consistency of treatment across all participating centers. Analyses from previous studies have shown that poor compliance and protocol violation have a significant adverse effect on treatment outcomes. The results of the clinical trials may, therefore, be confounded by poor quality radiotherapy. Target volume delineation (TVD) is one of the most critical steps in the radiotherapy process. Many studies have shown large inter-observer variations in contouring, both within and outside of clinical trials. High precision techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided brachytherapy, and stereotactic radiotherapy have steep dose gradients, and errors in contouring may lead to inadequate dose to the tumor and consequently, reduce the chance of cure. Similarly, variation in organ at risk delineation will make it difficult to evaluate dose response for toxicity. This article reviews the literature on TVD variability and its impact on dosimetry and clinical outcomes. The implications for quality assurance in clinical trials are discussed.