Routine use of hysterosalpingography prior to laparoscopy in the fertility workup: a multicentre randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: A multicentre randomized controlled trial with or without hysterosalpingography (HSG) was conducted to assess the usefulness of HSG as a routine investigation in the fertility workup prior to laparoscopy and dye. METHODS: From 1 April 1997 to 1 April 2002, subfertile women were allocated...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 21; no. 5; pp. 1227 - 1231 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
01-05-2006
Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | BACKGROUND: A multicentre randomized controlled trial with or without hysterosalpingography (HSG) was conducted to assess the usefulness of HSG as a routine investigation in the fertility workup prior to laparoscopy and dye. METHODS: From 1 April 1997 to 1 April 2002, subfertile women were allocated by a computer–based 1 : 1 ratio randomization procedure, either for an HSG followed by laparoscopy and dye (the intervention group) of for laparoscopy and dye only (the control group) as a part of their fertility workup. Cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) within 18 months after randomization was the primary outcome of interest. RESULTS: 344 women were randomized to the intervention group (n = 169) and the control group (n = 175). There was no significant difference in CPR at 18 months in the intervention group (49.1%) [95% confidence interval (CI) 41.6 to 56.6] and the control group (50.3%) (95% CI 42.8 to 57.8), a difference of –1.2% (95% CI –11.8% to 9.5%). CONCLUSION: The routine use of HSG at an early stage in the fertility workup prior to laparoscopy and dye does not influence CPR, compared with the routine use of laparoscopy and dye without HSG. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:8776E08125083B0F9C89E6EDCE6ABC85C72E0F3E 4To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Centre Haaglanden, PO Box 432, 2501 CK, The Hague, The Netherlands. E-mail: dperquin@knoware.nl local:478 ark:/67375/HXZ-VBJ7JDXS-4 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
DOI: | 10.1093/humrep/dei478 |