Guidelines on the safety of light-based home-use hair removal devices from the European Society for Laser Dermatology
In the past 5 years since their US introduction, there has been a rapid proliferation of light‐based hair removal devices intended for home‐use. In the last 2 years in Europe, sales already run into many tens of thousands of units with well‐known multi‐national companies entering the market. These g...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Vol. 26; no. 7; pp. 799 - 811 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-07-2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In the past 5 years since their US introduction, there has been a rapid proliferation of light‐based hair removal devices intended for home‐use. In the last 2 years in Europe, sales already run into many tens of thousands of units with well‐known multi‐national companies entering the market. These guidelines provide a definition of light‐based home‐use technology, to inform healthcare professionals about home‐use light‐based technology and encourage manufacturers wishing to sell in Europe to adopt ‘best practice’. The review presents the current status on standards and regulation issues and considers home‐use safety issues, encompassing human, device and electrical safety, given risks to the eyes and skin from optical radiation both to the consumer and persons in the vicinity. Proposed technical measurement methodology is considered with focus on recognized critical parameters for the safe use of light‐based hair removal technology including recording the technical performance and safety claims of a range of home‐use hair removal devices. The literature review emphasizes potential adverse incidents and safety aspects of treating cosmetic conditions, such as unwanted hair growth. Although some regulations exist, they differ from region to region and there is a specific need for international common principles and guidelines relating to the manufacture, marketing and use of intense pulsed light and laser devices, including manufacturing standards for home‐use products intended, amongst others, for cosmetic hair removal and photo‐rejuvenation procedures. In these guidelines, the European Society for Laser Dermatology (ESLD) provides a professional view of what ‘best practice’ may imply for manufacturers and consumers alike. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-XD73X454-B istex:C38A83D6063BC55BBA5FE0DED1FE29E876418CF9 ArticleID:JDV4406 Godfrey Town receives consultancy fees and travel grants from CyDen Ltd., SA1 8PH, Swansea, UK and Unilever HPC, Trumball, USA. Caerwyn Ash receives salary from Cyden Ltd., SA1 8PH, Swansea, Wales, UK. Christine Dierickx receives consultancy fees from Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, United States. Klaus Fritz is remunerated for presentations and hands‐on training with other devices manufactured by one of the companies mentioned but not related to this technology. Peter Bjerring has received consultancy fees from CyDen Ltd., SA1 8PH, Swansea, Wales. Merete Haedersdal receives consultancy fees from Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, United States. Conflict of interest ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0926-9959 1468-3083 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04406.x |