Periodic capacity management under a lead-time performance constraint
In this paper, we study a production system that operates under a lead-time performance constraint which guarantees the completion of an order before a pre-determined lead-time with a certain probability. The demand arrival times and the service requirements for the orders are random. To reduce the...
Saved in:
Published in: | OR Spectrum Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 221 - 249 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer-Verlag
2013
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this paper, we study a production system that operates under a lead-time performance constraint which guarantees the completion of an order before a pre-determined lead-time with a certain probability. The demand arrival times and the service requirements for the orders are random. To reduce the capacity-related operational costs, the production system under study has the option to use flexible capacity. We focus on periodic capacity policies and model the production system as a queuing system that can change its capacity periodically and choose to operate in one of the two levels: a permanent capacity level and a permanent plus contingent capacity level. Contingent capacity is supplied if needed at the start of a period, and is available during that period, at a cost rate that is decreasing in period length in different functional forms. Next, we propose a search algorithm that finds the capacity levels and the switching point that minimizes the capacity-related costs for a given period length. The behaviour of the capacity-related costs changes drastically under different period lengths and cost structures. In our computational study, we observe that the periodic capacity flexibility can reduce the capacity-related operational costs significantly (up to 35%). However, in order to achieve these savings, the period length must be chosen carefully depending on ambition level and capacity-related costs. We also observe that the percentage savings are higher for more ambitious lead-time performance constraints. Moreover, we observe that the use of contingent capacity makes the total system costs more insensitive to the lead-time performance requirements. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0171-6468 1436-6304 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00291-011-0261-4 |