Xenon provides faster emergence from anesthesia than does nitrous oxide-sevoflurane or nitrous oxide-isoflurane

• Published in: Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) Vol. 86; no. 6; pp. 1273 - 1278
• Main Authors: GOTO, T, SAITO, H, SHINKAI, M, NAKATA, Y, ICHINOSE, F, MORITA, S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hagerstown, MD Lippincott 01-06-1997
• Subjects: Adult; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, General - methods; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents; Biological and medical sciences; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ethers; Female; Humans; Isoflurane; Medical sciences; Methyl Ethers; Middle Aged; Neuropharmacology; Nitrous Oxide; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; Sevoflurane; Xenon; Volatile compound; Human; Xenon; General anesthesia; Recovery; Isoflurane; Sevoflurane; Gases; General anesthetic; Surgery; Fluorine Organic compounds; Nitrogen protoxide; Comparative study
• ISSN: 0003-3022; 1528-1175
• DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199706000-00007

Xenon, an inert gas with anesthetic properties (minimum alveolar concentration [MAC] = 71%), has an extremely low blood:gas partition coefficient (0.14). Therefore, we predicted that xenon would provide more rapid emergence from anesthesia than does N2O+isoflurane or N2O+sevoflurane of equivalent MAC.
Thirty American Society of Anesthsiologists class I or II patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy were randomly assigned to receive 60% xenon, 60% N2O + 0.5% isoflurane, or 60% N2O + 0.70% sevoflurane (all concentrations are end-tidal: n = 10 per group). After placement of an epidural catheter, anesthesia was induced with standardized doses of midazolam, thiopental, and fentanyl. Thirty minutes later, xenon, N2O+isoflurane, or N2O+sevoflurane was started as previously assigned. These regimens were supplemented with epidural anesthesia with mepivacaine so that the mean arterial pressure and heart rate were controlled within 20% of the preoperative values. At the end of operation lasting approximately 2 h, all inhalational anesthetics were discontinued, and the patients were allowed to awaken while breathing spontaneously on an 8 l/min inflow of oxygen. A blinded investigator recorded the time until the patient opened her eyes on command (T1), was judged ready for extubation (T2), could correctly state her name, her date of birth, and the name of the hospital (T3), and could count backward from 10 to 1 in less than 15 s (T4).
Emergence times from xenon anesthesia were: T1, 3.4 +/- 0.9 min; T2, 3.6 +/- 1 min; T3, 5.2 +/- 1.4 min; and T4, 6.0 +/- 1.6 min (mean +/- SD). These were one half to one third of those from N2O+sevoflurane (T1, 6.0 +/- 1.7 min; T4, 10.5 +/- 2.5 min) or N2O+isoflurane (T1, 7.0 +/- 1.9 min; T4, 14.3 +/- 2.8 min) anesthesia. The three groups did not differ in terms of patient demographics, the duration of anesthesia, the amount of epidural mepivacaine administered, or the postoperative pain rating. No patient could recalls intraoperative events.
Emergence from xenon anesthesia is two or three times faster than that from equal-MAC N2O+isoflurane or N2O+sevoflurane anesthesia.