Breastfeeding versus free distribution of infant formulas by the Public Health System
OBJECTIVETo characterize the situation of breastfeeding and the adequacy of prescription of infant formulas to infants assisted by a secondary care program of the Public Health System. METHODSThis is a cross-sectional study with analysis of medical records of 350 infants from zero to 6 months, follo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Einstein (São Paulo, Brazil) Vol. 19; p. eAO6451 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
01-01-2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | OBJECTIVETo characterize the situation of breastfeeding and the adequacy of prescription of infant formulas to infants assisted by a secondary care program of the Public Health System. METHODSThis is a cross-sectional study with analysis of medical records of 350 infants from zero to 6 months, followed up between February to April 2019. RESULTSThe possibility of breastfeeding was present in 97.0% of mothers and no infant presented an acceptable medical condition for proscription of breastfeeding. Despite this, only 47.2% of cases were on exclusive breastfeeding before being referred to the program. Regarding the reasons for the introduction of infant formulas, complementation to breast milk was the most present (75.8%), followed by mothers returning to the job market (20.1%). The general rates of inadequacy of those prescribed were 65% before arriving at the program, increasing to 69% (standard formulas) and 80% (formulas for special purposes) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONThe low rate of exclusive breastfeeding and the indiscriminate prescription of infant formulas are a concern for damage to maternal-child healthcare and sound finances of the Public Health System. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 none. Flávia Galvão Cândido: participated in the design, planning, analysis and interpretation of data, writing and reviewing. Brunnella Alcântara Chagas de Freitas and Rita de Cássia Santos Soares: participated in the conception, planning and writing. Jersica Martins Bittencourt and Dayane de Castro Morais: conducted data analysis and interpretation, writing and review. Daniela Neves Ribeiro, Camilla de Freitas Niquine, Sarah Aparecida Vieira Ribeiro and Raquel Maria Amaral Araújo: participated in the conception and planning. Bruna Romano Zucchetto, Taimã de Castro Carvalho and Isabela Carvalho Rezende: participated in the planning and data collection. All authors read and agreed with the final version of the article. Conflict of interest AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTION |
ISSN: | 1679-4508 2317-6385 2317-6385 |
DOI: | 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6451 |