Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Retrospective Study

Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative resu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of surgery Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 948 - 953
Main Authors: Vărcuş, Flore, Beuran, Mircea, Lica, Ioan, Turculet, Claudiu, Cotarlet, Adrian Valentin, Georgescu, Stefan, Vintila, Dan, Sabău, Dan, Sabau, Alexandru, Ciuce, Constantin, Bintintan, Vasile, Georgescu, Eugen, Popescu, Razvan, Tarta, Cristi, Surlin, Valeriu
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01-04-2017
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery. Methods Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients’ charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes. Results Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3–25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage. Conclusions This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the “gold standard” in patients with Boey score 0 or 1.
AbstractList The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery. Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients' charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes. Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3-25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage. This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the "gold standard" in patients with Boey score 0 or 1.
Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery. Methods Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients’ charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes. Results Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3–25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage. Conclusions This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the “gold standard” in patients with Boey score 0 or 1.
BACKGROUNDSThe incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery.METHODSBetween 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients' charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes.RESULTSBoey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3-25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage.CONCLUSIONSThis study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the "gold standard" in patients with Boey score 0 or 1.
Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery. Methods Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients' charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes. Results Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3-25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage. Conclusions This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the "gold standard" in patients with Boey score 0 or 1.
Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery. Methods Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients’ charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short‐term outcomes. Results Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3–25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage. Conclusions This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the “gold standard” in patients with Boey score 0 or 1.
The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery. Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients' charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes. Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3-25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage. This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the "gold standard" in patients with Boey score 0 or 1.
Author Bintintan, Vasile
Lica, Ioan
Beuran, Mircea
Surlin, Valeriu
Sabau, Alexandru
Georgescu, Eugen
Cotarlet, Adrian Valentin
Vintila, Dan
Sabău, Dan
Tarta, Cristi
Vărcuş, Flore
Popescu, Razvan
Ciuce, Constantin
Turculet, Claudiu
Georgescu, Stefan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Flore
  surname: Vărcuş
  fullname: Vărcuş, Flore
  email: varcus.florian@yahoo.com
  organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Clinical Emergency County Hospital, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Mircea
  surname: Beuran
  fullname: Beuran, Mircea
  organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Clinical Emergency Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ioan
  surname: Lica
  fullname: Lica, Ioan
  organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Clinical Emergency Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Claudiu
  surname: Turculet
  fullname: Turculet, Claudiu
  organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Clinical Emergency Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Adrian Valentin
  surname: Cotarlet
  fullname: Cotarlet, Adrian Valentin
  organization: Onesti City Hospital
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Stefan
  surname: Georgescu
  fullname: Georgescu, Stefan
  organization: Surgical Clinic 2, County Emergency Hospital “Sf. Spiridon”, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Dan
  surname: Vintila
  fullname: Vintila, Dan
  organization: Surgical Clinic 2, County Emergency Hospital “Sf. Spiridon”, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Dan
  surname: Sabău
  fullname: Sabău, Dan
  organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Emergency County Hospital, Victor Papilian Faculty of Medicine
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Alexandru
  surname: Sabau
  fullname: Sabau, Alexandru
  organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Victor Papilian Faculty of Medicine
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Constantin
  surname: Ciuce
  fullname: Ciuce, Constantin
  organization: Surgical Clinic 1, Emergency County Hospital, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Vasile
  surname: Bintintan
  fullname: Bintintan, Vasile
  organization: Surgical Clinic 1, Emergency County Hospital, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Eugen
  surname: Georgescu
  fullname: Georgescu, Eugen
  organization: Surgical Clinic 1, County Emergency Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Razvan
  surname: Popescu
  fullname: Popescu, Razvan
  organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Emergency County Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Ovidius University
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Cristi
  surname: Tarta
  fullname: Tarta, Cristi
  organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Clinical Emergency County Hospital, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Valeriu
  surname: Surlin
  fullname: Surlin, Valeriu
  organization: Surgical Clinic 1, County Emergency Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27882415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkV9r1EAUxQep2G31A_hSAn3xJfXe-ZdJ39rFbZUFxXXxcUgmk5KSTdKZRNlv37ukighF5-VemN85nMs5YUdd33nG3iJcIED2PgJwbVJAnQrDMdUv2AKl4CkXXByxBQgtaUdxzE5ivAfATIN-xY55ZgyXqBZstS6GIvTR9UPjkq9-KJqQ1H1IvvhAoxh9Resw0ue2dT5cJldEjaQYvBubHz7ZjFO1f81e1kUb_Zunecq2qw_flrfp-vPNx-XVOnVSqTxFmSmnOa9BljyXkmPtCld7ASW9CnlVlVi6XDkDBjKpNNYZ0K3KOUnxxSl7N_sOoX-YfBztronOt23R-X6KFo3BTKEG-R-oFLk2iAfX87_Q-34KHR1CVKY0kXgwxJlydH0MvrZDaHZF2FsEe-jDzn1Y6sMe-rCaNGdPzlO589Vvxa8CCMhn4GfT-v2_He33T5vrFRgOOWn5rI0k6-58-CP2s4keAXrJpUE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_024_10881_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12262_021_02795_1
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000022226
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13017_019_0283_9
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_3716829
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amsu_2019_05_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000000826
crossref_primary_10_24884_1607_4181_2022_29_1_54_62
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00595_021_02247_z
crossref_primary_10_17116_endoskop20192503151
Cites_doi 10.1056/NEJM198904133201504
10.1007/s004649900515
10.1002/bjs.1800800239
10.1016/j.anchir.2004.06.012
10.1007/s002689910048
10.1089/lap.2008.0328
10.1002/bjs.1800770916
10.1007/s004649901072
10.1007/s00268-011-1106-7
10.1097/00000658-199608000-00004
10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001
10.1080/110241599750006479
10.1007/s00464-009-0765-z
10.1007/BF00316801
10.1007/s00464‐009‐0765‐z
10.1007/s00268‐011‐1106‐7
10.1007/BF00768887
10.1097/00000658‐199608000‐00004
10.1097/00000658‐200203000‐00001
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2016
2017 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie
World Journal of Surgery is a copyright of Springer, 2017.
Copyright_xml – notice: Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2016
– notice: 2017 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie
– notice: World Journal of Surgery is a copyright of Springer, 2017.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7QO
7T5
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FD
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
H94
K9.
M0S
M1P
P64
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s00268-016-3821-6
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Immunology Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Technology Research Database
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Immunology Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
Technology Research Database

Engineering Research Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1432-2323
EndPage 953
ExternalDocumentID 4319889661
10_1007_s00268_016_3821_6
27882415
WJSBF08209
Genre article
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.55
.86
.GJ
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
123
199
1N0
1SB
2.D
203
28-
29R
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3O-
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5QI
5VS
67Z
6NX
78A
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AABYN
AAFGU
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJKR
AAKSU
AANXM
AANZL
AAPBV
AAQQT
AARHV
AARTL
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYFA
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFGW
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKAS
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABLJU
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABOCM
ABPLI
ABPTK
ABQBU
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACBMV
ACBRV
ACBXY
ACBYP
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACIGE
ACIPQ
ACIWK
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPRK
ACTTH
ACUDM
ACVWB
ACWMK
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADMDM
ADOXG
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEEQQ
AEFIE
AEFTE
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AEQTP
AESKC
AESTI
AETLH
AEVLU
AEVTX
AEXYK
AFAFS
AFEXP
AFFNX
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFNRJ
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGBP
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGKHE
AGMZJ
AGQMX
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHVUH
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIIXL
AILAN
AIMYW
AITGF
AJBLW
AJDOV
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
AKQUC
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GXS
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
J5H
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
L7B
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UNUBA
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WH7
WJK
WK8
WXSBR
X7M
YLTOR
Z45
Z7U
Z7V
Z7X
Z81
Z82
Z83
Z87
Z8O
Z8P
Z8U
Z8V
Z8W
Z91
Z92
ZA5
ZGI
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
1OC
AACDK
AAEOY
AAJBT
ABAKF
ABQWH
ACZOJ
ADIYS
AEFQL
AFBBN
AFFPM
AGQEE
AHBTC
AIGIU
AITYG
ALIPV
ALUQN
H13
HGLYW
MEWTI
SUPJJ
AAYZH
CGR
CUY
CVF
DCZOG
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAMNL
AAYXX
CITATION
7QO
7T5
7XB
8FD
8FK
FR3
H94
K9.
P64
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4559-1475c622f04b294421fcacfe30bbbbd12ddb1bc95c808074561f701005cc40013
IEDL.DBID AEJHL
ISSN 0364-2313
IngestDate Sat Oct 26 01:07:59 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 08:04:13 EDT 2024
Sun Nov 24 15:14:00 EST 2024
Thu Nov 21 23:32:24 EST 2024
Wed Oct 16 00:51:42 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 00:43:24 EDT 2024
Sat Dec 16 12:03:16 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Peritoneal Lavage
Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Taylor Method
Laparoscopic Approach
Duodenal Fistula
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4559-1475c622f04b294421fcacfe30bbbbd12ddb1bc95c808074561f701005cc40013
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 27882415
PQID 1875684314
PQPubID 47185
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1881751604
proquest_miscellaneous_1843968111
proquest_journals_1875684314
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_016_3821_6
pubmed_primary_27882415
wiley_primary_10_1007_s00268_016_3821_6_WJSBF08209
springer_journals_10_1007_s00268_016_3821_6
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate April 2017
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2017
  text: April 2017
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Cham
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Cham
– name: United States
– name: Lupsingen
PublicationSubtitle Official Journal of the International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie
PublicationTitle World journal of surgery
PublicationTitleAbbrev World J Surg
PublicationTitleAlternate World J Surg
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Springer International Publishing
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer International Publishing
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Vaidya, Garg, Shah (CR17) 2009; 19
Tate, Dawson, Lau (CR8) 1993; 80
Crofts, Park, Steele (CR5) 1989; 320
CR16
Millat, Fingerhut, Borie (CR6) 2000; 24
Bloechle, Emmermann, Treu (CR10) 1995; 9
Bertloff, Lange (CR11) 2010; 24
Mouret, Francois, Vignal (CR2) 1990; 77
Siu, Leong, Law (CR9) 2002; 235
Bergamaschi, Marvik, Johnsen (CR12) 1999; 13
Palanivelu, Jani, Senthilnathan (CR13) 2007; 26
Lo, Wu, Huang (CR14) 2011; 35
Songne, Jean, Foulatier (CR4) 2004; 129
Hermansson, Staël von Holstein, Zilling (CR7) 1999; 165
Lau, Leung, Kwong (CR15) 1996; 224
Nathanson, Easter, Cuschieri (CR3) 1990; 4
Druart, Van Hee, Etienne (CR1) 1997; 11
1995; 9
1990; 77
2010; 24
2013; 2
1997; 11
2000; 24
2002; 235
1989; 320
1999; 13
1999; 165
1993; 80
2011; 35
1996; 224
2009; 19
2004; 129
2007; 26
1990; 4
e_1_2_7_5_2
e_1_2_7_4_2
e_1_2_7_3_2
e_1_2_7_2_2
e_1_2_7_9_2
e_1_2_7_8_2
e_1_2_7_7_2
e_1_2_7_6_2
e_1_2_7_18_2
e_1_2_7_16_2
e_1_2_7_15_2
e_1_2_7_13_2
e_1_2_7_12_2
e_1_2_7_11_2
e_1_2_7_10_2
Sanabria A (e_1_2_7_17_2) 2013; 2
Palanivelu C (e_1_2_7_14_2) 2007; 26
References_xml – volume: 320
  start-page: 970
  issue: 15
  year: 1989
  end-page: 973
  ident: CR5
  article-title: A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med.
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM198904133201504
  contributor:
    fullname: Steele
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1017
  year: 1997
  end-page: 1020
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s004649900515
  contributor:
    fullname: Etienne
– volume: 80
  start-page: 235
  year: 1993
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Sutureless laparoscopic treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800239
  contributor:
    fullname: Lau
– volume: 129
  start-page: 578
  issue: 10
  year: 2004
  end-page: 582
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Non operative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer: results of a prospective study
  publication-title: Ann Chir
  doi: 10.1016/j.anchir.2004.06.012
  contributor:
    fullname: Foulatier
– volume: 24
  start-page: 299
  issue: 3
  year: 2000
  end-page: 306
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Surgical treatment of complicated duodenal ulcers: controlled trials
  publication-title: World J Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s002689910048
  contributor:
    fullname: Borie
– ident: CR16
– volume: 19
  start-page: 153
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 156
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer with delayed presentation
  publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech
  doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0328
  contributor:
    fullname: Shah
– volume: 9
  start-page: 898
  year: 1995
  end-page: 901
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Effect of pneumoperitoneum on the extent and severity of peritonitis induced by gastric ulcer perforation in the rat
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  contributor:
    fullname: Treu
– volume: 77
  start-page: 1006
  year: 1990
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770916
  contributor:
    fullname: Vignal
– volume: 13
  start-page: 679
  year: 1999
  end-page: 682
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Open versus laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s004649901072
  contributor:
    fullname: Johnsen
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1873
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1878
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Laparoscopic simple closure alone is adequate for low risk patients with perforated peptic ulcer
  publication-title: World J Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1106-7
  contributor:
    fullname: Huang
– volume: 224
  start-page: 131
  issue: 2
  year: 1996
  end-page: 138
  ident: CR15
  article-title: A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-199608000-00004
  contributor:
    fullname: Kwong
– volume: 235
  start-page: 313
  issue: 3
  year: 2002
  end-page: 319
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001
  contributor:
    fullname: Law
– volume: 165
  start-page: 566
  issue: 6
  year: 1999
  end-page: 572
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic ulcer perforation
  publication-title: Eur J Surg
  doi: 10.1080/110241599750006479
  contributor:
    fullname: Zilling
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1231
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1239
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0765-z
  contributor:
    fullname: Lange
– volume: 26
  start-page: 64
  year: 2007
  end-page: 66
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Laparoscopic management of duodenal ulcer perforation: is it advantageous?
  publication-title: Indian J Gastroenterol
  contributor:
    fullname: Senthilnathan
– volume: 4
  start-page: 232
  year: 1990
  end-page: 233
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/BF00316801
  contributor:
    fullname: Cuschieri
– volume: 235
  start-page: 313
  issue: 3
  year: 2002
  end-page: 319
  article-title: Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Ann Surg
– volume: 24
  start-page: 299
  issue: 3
  year: 2000
  end-page: 306
  article-title: Surgical treatment of complicated duodenal ulcers: controlled trials
  publication-title: World J Surg
– volume: 9
  start-page: 898
  year: 1995
  end-page: 901
  article-title: Effect of pneumoperitoneum on the extent and severity of peritonitis induced by gastric ulcer perforation in the rat
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 224
  start-page: 131
  issue: 2
  year: 1996
  end-page: 138
  article-title: A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique
  publication-title: Ann Surg
– volume: 165
  start-page: 566
  issue: 6
  year: 1999
  end-page: 572
  article-title: Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic ulcer perforation
  publication-title: Eur J Surg
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1231
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1239
  article-title: Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 4
  start-page: 232
  year: 1990
  end-page: 233
  article-title: Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1873
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1878
  article-title: Laparoscopic simple closure alone is adequate for low risk patients with perforated peptic ulcer
  publication-title: World J Surg
– volume: 2
  start-page: CD004778
  year: 2013
  article-title: Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 19
  start-page: 153
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 156
  article-title: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer with delayed presentation
  publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech
– volume: 77
  start-page: 1006
  year: 1990
  article-title: Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer
  publication-title: Br J Surg
– volume: 80
  start-page: 235
  year: 1993
  article-title: Sutureless laparoscopic treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer
  publication-title: Br J Surg
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1017
  year: 1997
  end-page: 1020
  article-title: Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 129
  start-page: 578
  issue: 10
  year: 2004
  end-page: 582
  article-title: Non operative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer: results of a prospective study
  publication-title: Ann Chir
– volume: 13
  start-page: 679
  year: 1999
  end-page: 682
  article-title: Open versus laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 320
  start-page: 970
  issue: 15
  year: 1989
  end-page: 973
  article-title: A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med.
– volume: 26
  start-page: 64
  year: 2007
  end-page: 66
  article-title: Laparoscopic management of duodenal ulcer perforation: is it advantageous?
  publication-title: Indian J Gastroenterol
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_2
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM198904133201504
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_2
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800239
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_2
  doi: 10.1007/s00464‐009‐0765‐z
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_2
  doi: 10.1007/s002689910048
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_2
  doi: 10.1080/110241599750006479
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_2
  doi: 10.1007/s00268‐011‐1106‐7
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.anchir.2004.06.012
– volume: 2
  start-page: CD004778
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_7_17_2
  article-title: Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  contributor:
    fullname: Sanabria A
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_2
  doi: 10.1007/BF00316801
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_2
  doi: 10.1007/BF00768887
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_2
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770916
– volume: 26
  start-page: 64
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_7_14_2
  article-title: Laparoscopic management of duodenal ulcer perforation: is it advantageous?
  publication-title: Indian J Gastroenterol
  contributor:
    fullname: Palanivelu C
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_2
  doi: 10.1007/s004649900515
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_2
  doi: 10.1097/00000658‐199608000‐00004
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_2
  doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0328
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_2
  doi: 10.1007/s004649901072
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_2
  doi: 10.1097/00000658‐200203000‐00001
SSID ssj0017606
Score 2.350009
Snippet Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic...
The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to...
Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic...
BACKGROUNDSThe incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 948
SubjectTerms Abdominal Surgery
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiac Surgery
Conversion to Open Surgery - statistics & numerical data
Duodenal Fistula
Female
General Surgery
Humans
Laparoscopic Approach
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Original Scientific Report
Peptic Ulcer Perforation - surgery
Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Peritoneal Lavage
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Romania - epidemiology
Surgery
Taylor Method
Thoracic Surgery
Vascular Surgery
Young Adult
Title Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Retrospective Study
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00268-016-3821-6
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1007%2Fs00268-016-3821-6
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27882415
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1875684314
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1843968111
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1881751604
Volume 41
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS-QwFD54gWVfvO3F8UYFn1aytGmatL6NOnUUFUFl960kaQKy0pHRefDfe06nLcruKtqXFhra0-Qk5_t6LgHYscqktCUNo9pRSFCsYMbImGmjE-HjMvOe8p2Hl-r8d3o4oDI5vPt1Uf352Xok64W6y3UjtkBxV5LFKY-YnIV5ND0J6vZ8f3AyPO18B0qGjYdSMEQvcevL_NdDXlqjvyDmM_foS_BaW5988SNyL8FCgzWD_lQ5lmHGVSvw6azxpn-B_BQtJVWzHN3d2AChuL4ZBwhig4s65h1RaImXuKbY4PrWuvFe0MdWD-NRm54ZUBTi41e4zgdXB0PW7KvArEACwSKhEis596EwPBOCR95q610cGjzKiJeliYzNEktFJxVBLK-Qt4WJtYIw4zeYq0aVW4VAl16YVDvplBYlJfVm2nkrTGiRyCjTgx9t_xZ30_IZRVcoue6ZgkLMqGcK2YONdgSKZibdFxESKpkizBE92O5u4xwgx4au3GhCbRBWyRSX7dfapIiUIhnic75PR7eTiCvkGYhkerDbjuEzAf4vLq814u0PK36dXO7nBLaytXe9Yh0-c4IRdaTQBsw9jCduE2bvy8lWo_V0Pr46yp8A2nT4AA
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,27933,27934,41073,42142,48344,48347,48357,49649,49652,49662,52153
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3NT9swFMCfRpHYLmOMwcpnkDgxWUoc1064FUYoUBASRewW2Y4tIaEWlfaw_5730iQCDZggp0ixnOfv39P7MMCuVSahK2kY5Y5CBcUKZoyMmTa6I3xcpN5TvHPvSl38SX4fUZqcuI6FKb3da5NkuVM3wW6kLpDjlWRxwiMm52BepFLgVJ7vngyOs8Z4oGRYmSgFQ3yJa2PmS5U8P47-Ycwn9tHn9FoeP9nihwT_Bl8r2gy6s-mxBJ_c8DssnFf29GXI-nhWUj7L0f2tDRDG9e04QIwNLkuvd-TQAl9xV7HB9Z114_2gi6Um41EdoBmQH-LfH3CdHQ0Oe6y6WYFZgSoEi4TqWMm5D4XhqRA88lZb7-LQ4FNEvChMZGzasZR2UhFkeYWaW9ixVhA1rkBrOBq6nxDowguTaCed0qKgsN5UO2-FCS2qMsq0Ya_u4Px-lkAjb1Illz2Tk5MZ9Uwu27BRD0FeraWHPEKVSiYIOqINO81nXAVk2tBDN5pSGQQrmeDG_VaZBFkpkiHWszob3kYirlDTQJZpw696DJ8I8Lq4vJwS_29YfnN6dZARbqVr7_rFNnzuDc77ef_k4mwdvnCCitJvaANak_HUbcLcQzHdqpbAI_5a-mI
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpZ3bS9xAFIcPXkD6Uu3NrtU2Qp9aBpPJ7Ezii6y6YWtXEay0b2GuIJTssu4-9L_vOdkkKL2ImKdAhslkrt-PcwnAR6tMRr-kYZQ7CgWKFcwYmTJtdF-E1OUhULzz6Epd_MhOh5Qm56iNham93VuT5DKmgbI0VfODqQsHXeAbSQdywpIszXjC5CqsCxQyONHXB8Oz0bgzJCgZN-ZKwRBl0taw-bdK7h9Nf_DmHVvpfZKtj6Ji88kfsQXPGwqNBstp8wJWfPUSNs4bO_srKMZ4hlKey8n0xkYI6fpmFiHeRpe1NzzyqcNb3G1sdP3T-tlhNMBS89mkDdyMyD_x12u4LobfTkas-eMCswKlBUuE6lvJeYiF4bkQPAlW2-DT2ODlEu6cSYzN-5bSUSqCr6BQ0cV9awXR5BtYqyaVfwuRdkGYTHvplRaOwn1z7YMVJrYocZTpwae2s8vpMrFG2aVQrnumJOcz6plS9mC3HY6yWWO3ZYJSS2YIQKIH-91jXB1k8tCVnyyoDAKXzHBD_1-ZDBkqkTHWs70c6q5FXKECQcbpwed2PO804N_N5fX0ePjDyu9nV8cFYVi-86hXfICNy9OiHH-5-PoOnnFijdqdaBfW5rOF34PVW7d436yG30vLAzQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic+Repair+for+Perforated+Peptic+Ulcer%3A+A+Retrospective+Study&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+surgery&rft.au=V%C4%83rcu%C5%9F%2C+Flore&rft.au=Beuran%2C+Mircea&rft.au=Lica%2C+Ioan&rft.au=Turculet%2C+Claudiu&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.pub=Springer+International+Publishing&rft.issn=0364-2313&rft.eissn=1432-2323&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=948&rft.epage=953&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00268-016-3821-6&rft.externalDBID=10.1007%252Fs00268-016-3821-6&rft.externalDocID=WJSBF08209
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon