Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Retrospective Study
Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative resu...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of surgery Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 948 - 953 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
01-04-2017
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Backgrounds
The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery.
Methods
Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients’ charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes.
Results
Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3–25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage.
Conclusions
This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the “gold standard” in patients with Boey score 0 or 1. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery.
Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients' charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes.
Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3-25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage.
This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the "gold standard" in patients with Boey score 0 or 1. Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery. Methods Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients’ charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes. Results Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3–25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage. Conclusions This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the “gold standard” in patients with Boey score 0 or 1. BACKGROUNDSThe incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery.METHODSBetween 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients' charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes.RESULTSBoey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3-25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage.CONCLUSIONSThis study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the "gold standard" in patients with Boey score 0 or 1. Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery. Methods Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients' charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes. Results Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3-25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage. Conclusions This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the "gold standard" in patients with Boey score 0 or 1. Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery. Methods Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients’ charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short‐term outcomes. Results Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3–25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage. Conclusions This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the “gold standard” in patients with Boey score 0 or 1. The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to this condition has been adopted by increased number of surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer performed in eight Romanian surgical centers with extensive experience in laparoscopic surgery. Between 2009 and 2013, 297 patients with perforated peptic ulcer were operated in the eight centers participating in this retrospective study. The patients' charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical procedure, complications and short-term outcomes. Boey score of 0 was found in 122 patients (41.1%), Boey 1 in 169 (56.9%), Boey 3 in 6 (2.0%). For 145 (48.8%) patients, primary suture repair was performed, in 146 (49.2%) primary suture repair with omentopexy. There were 6 (2.0%) conversions to open surgery. The operative time was between 25 and 120 min, with a mean of 68 min. Two (0.7%) deaths were noted. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days, ranges 3-25 days. Postoperative complications included: 7 (2.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 5 (1.6%) cardiovascular, 3 (1.0%) pulmonary, 2 (0.7%) duodenal leakages, 3 (1.0%) deep space infections and 1 (0.3%) upper digestive hemorrhage. This study shows that the laparoscopic approach for PPU is feasible; the procedure is safe, with no increased risk of duodenal fistulae or residual intraperitoneal abscesses. We now consider the laparoscopic approach for PPU as the "gold standard" in patients with Boey score 0 or 1. |
Author | Bintintan, Vasile Lica, Ioan Beuran, Mircea Surlin, Valeriu Sabau, Alexandru Georgescu, Eugen Cotarlet, Adrian Valentin Vintila, Dan Sabău, Dan Tarta, Cristi Vărcuş, Flore Popescu, Razvan Ciuce, Constantin Turculet, Claudiu Georgescu, Stefan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Flore surname: Vărcuş fullname: Vărcuş, Flore email: varcus.florian@yahoo.com organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Clinical Emergency County Hospital, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy – sequence: 2 givenname: Mircea surname: Beuran fullname: Beuran, Mircea organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Clinical Emergency Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy – sequence: 3 givenname: Ioan surname: Lica fullname: Lica, Ioan organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Clinical Emergency Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy – sequence: 4 givenname: Claudiu surname: Turculet fullname: Turculet, Claudiu organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Clinical Emergency Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy – sequence: 5 givenname: Adrian Valentin surname: Cotarlet fullname: Cotarlet, Adrian Valentin organization: Onesti City Hospital – sequence: 6 givenname: Stefan surname: Georgescu fullname: Georgescu, Stefan organization: Surgical Clinic 2, County Emergency Hospital “Sf. Spiridon”, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy – sequence: 7 givenname: Dan surname: Vintila fullname: Vintila, Dan organization: Surgical Clinic 2, County Emergency Hospital “Sf. Spiridon”, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy – sequence: 8 givenname: Dan surname: Sabău fullname: Sabău, Dan organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Emergency County Hospital, Victor Papilian Faculty of Medicine – sequence: 9 givenname: Alexandru surname: Sabau fullname: Sabau, Alexandru organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Victor Papilian Faculty of Medicine – sequence: 10 givenname: Constantin surname: Ciuce fullname: Ciuce, Constantin organization: Surgical Clinic 1, Emergency County Hospital, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy – sequence: 11 givenname: Vasile surname: Bintintan fullname: Bintintan, Vasile organization: Surgical Clinic 1, Emergency County Hospital, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy – sequence: 12 givenname: Eugen surname: Georgescu fullname: Georgescu, Eugen organization: Surgical Clinic 1, County Emergency Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova – sequence: 13 givenname: Razvan surname: Popescu fullname: Popescu, Razvan organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Emergency County Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Ovidius University – sequence: 14 givenname: Cristi surname: Tarta fullname: Tarta, Cristi organization: Surgical Clinic 2, Clinical Emergency County Hospital, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy – sequence: 15 givenname: Valeriu surname: Surlin fullname: Surlin, Valeriu organization: Surgical Clinic 1, County Emergency Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27882415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkV9r1EAUxQep2G31A_hSAn3xJfXe-ZdJ39rFbZUFxXXxcUgmk5KSTdKZRNlv37ukighF5-VemN85nMs5YUdd33nG3iJcIED2PgJwbVJAnQrDMdUv2AKl4CkXXByxBQgtaUdxzE5ivAfATIN-xY55ZgyXqBZstS6GIvTR9UPjkq9-KJqQ1H1IvvhAoxh9Resw0ue2dT5cJldEjaQYvBubHz7ZjFO1f81e1kUb_Zunecq2qw_flrfp-vPNx-XVOnVSqTxFmSmnOa9BljyXkmPtCld7ASW9CnlVlVi6XDkDBjKpNNYZ0K3KOUnxxSl7N_sOoX-YfBztronOt23R-X6KFo3BTKEG-R-oFLk2iAfX87_Q-34KHR1CVKY0kXgwxJlydH0MvrZDaHZF2FsEe-jDzn1Y6sMe-rCaNGdPzlO589Vvxa8CCMhn4GfT-v2_He33T5vrFRgOOWn5rI0k6-58-CP2s4keAXrJpUE |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_024_10881_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12262_021_02795_1 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000022226 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13017_019_0283_9 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_3716829 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amsu_2019_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000000826 crossref_primary_10_24884_1607_4181_2022_29_1_54_62 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00595_021_02247_z crossref_primary_10_17116_endoskop20192503151 |
Cites_doi | 10.1056/NEJM198904133201504 10.1007/s004649900515 10.1002/bjs.1800800239 10.1016/j.anchir.2004.06.012 10.1007/s002689910048 10.1089/lap.2008.0328 10.1002/bjs.1800770916 10.1007/s004649901072 10.1007/s00268-011-1106-7 10.1097/00000658-199608000-00004 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001 10.1080/110241599750006479 10.1007/s00464-009-0765-z 10.1007/BF00316801 10.1007/s00464‐009‐0765‐z 10.1007/s00268‐011‐1106‐7 10.1007/BF00768887 10.1097/00000658‐199608000‐00004 10.1097/00000658‐200203000‐00001 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2016 2017 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie World Journal of Surgery is a copyright of Springer, 2017. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2016 – notice: 2017 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie – notice: World Journal of Surgery is a copyright of Springer, 2017. |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7QO 7T5 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FD 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FR3 FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S M1P P64 PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00268-016-3821-6 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Immunology Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library Biotechnology Research Abstracts ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Immunology Abstracts Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1432-2323 |
EndPage | 953 |
ExternalDocumentID | 4319889661 10_1007_s00268_016_3821_6 27882415 WJSBF08209 |
Genre | article Multicenter Study Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .55 .86 .GJ .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 199 1N0 1SB 2.D 203 28- 29R 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 36B 3O- 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5QI 5VS 67Z 6NX 78A 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AABYN AAFGU AAHNG AAIAL AAJKR AAKSU AANXM AANZL AAPBV AAQQT AARHV AARTL AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYFA AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFGW ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKAS ABKCH ABKTR ABLJU ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABOCM ABPLI ABPTK ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACBMV ACBRV ACBXY ACBYP ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACIGE ACIPQ ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPRK ACTTH ACUDM ACVWB ACWMK ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADMDM ADOXG ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEEQQ AEFIE AEFTE AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AEQTP AESKC AESTI AETLH AEVLU AEVTX AEXYK AFAFS AFEXP AFFNX AFJLC AFKRA AFLOW AFNRJ AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGBP AGGDS AGJBK AGKHE AGMZJ AGQMX AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHMBA AHSBF AHVUH AHYZX AIAKS AIIXL AILAN AIMYW AITGF AJBLW AJDOV AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD AKQUC ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 EBD EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMB EMOBN EN4 ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GRRUI GXS HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z J5H JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW KPH L7B LAS LLZTM M1P M4Y MA- N2Q N9A NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OVD P19 P2P P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI ROL RPX RRX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UNUBA UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WH7 WJK WK8 WXSBR X7M YLTOR Z45 Z7U Z7V Z7X Z81 Z82 Z83 Z87 Z8O Z8P Z8U Z8V Z8W Z91 Z92 ZA5 ZGI ZMTXR ZOVNA ~EX 1OC AACDK AAEOY AAJBT ABAKF ABQWH ACZOJ ADIYS AEFQL AFBBN AFFPM AGQEE AHBTC AIGIU AITYG ALIPV ALUQN H13 HGLYW MEWTI SUPJJ AAYZH CGR CUY CVF DCZOG ECM EIF NPM AAMNL AAYXX CITATION 7QO 7T5 7XB 8FD 8FK FR3 H94 K9. P64 PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4559-1475c622f04b294421fcacfe30bbbbd12ddb1bc95c808074561f701005cc40013 |
IEDL.DBID | AEJHL |
ISSN | 0364-2313 |
IngestDate | Sat Oct 26 01:07:59 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 08:04:13 EDT 2024 Sun Nov 24 15:14:00 EST 2024 Thu Nov 21 23:32:24 EST 2024 Wed Oct 16 00:51:42 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:43:24 EDT 2024 Sat Dec 16 12:03:16 EST 2023 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Peritoneal Lavage Perforated Peptic Ulcer Taylor Method Laparoscopic Approach Duodenal Fistula |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4559-1475c622f04b294421fcacfe30bbbbd12ddb1bc95c808074561f701005cc40013 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 27882415 |
PQID | 1875684314 |
PQPubID | 47185 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1881751604 proquest_miscellaneous_1843968111 proquest_journals_1875684314 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_016_3821_6 pubmed_primary_27882415 wiley_primary_10_1007_s00268_016_3821_6_WJSBF08209 springer_journals_10_1007_s00268_016_3821_6 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | April 2017 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2017 text: April 2017 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Cham |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Cham – name: United States – name: Lupsingen |
PublicationSubtitle | Official Journal of the International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie |
PublicationTitle | World journal of surgery |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | World J Surg |
PublicationTitleAlternate | World J Surg |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Springer International Publishing Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer International Publishing – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | Vaidya, Garg, Shah (CR17) 2009; 19 Tate, Dawson, Lau (CR8) 1993; 80 Crofts, Park, Steele (CR5) 1989; 320 CR16 Millat, Fingerhut, Borie (CR6) 2000; 24 Bloechle, Emmermann, Treu (CR10) 1995; 9 Bertloff, Lange (CR11) 2010; 24 Mouret, Francois, Vignal (CR2) 1990; 77 Siu, Leong, Law (CR9) 2002; 235 Bergamaschi, Marvik, Johnsen (CR12) 1999; 13 Palanivelu, Jani, Senthilnathan (CR13) 2007; 26 Lo, Wu, Huang (CR14) 2011; 35 Songne, Jean, Foulatier (CR4) 2004; 129 Hermansson, Staël von Holstein, Zilling (CR7) 1999; 165 Lau, Leung, Kwong (CR15) 1996; 224 Nathanson, Easter, Cuschieri (CR3) 1990; 4 Druart, Van Hee, Etienne (CR1) 1997; 11 1995; 9 1990; 77 2010; 24 2013; 2 1997; 11 2000; 24 2002; 235 1989; 320 1999; 13 1999; 165 1993; 80 2011; 35 1996; 224 2009; 19 2004; 129 2007; 26 1990; 4 e_1_2_7_5_2 e_1_2_7_4_2 e_1_2_7_3_2 e_1_2_7_2_2 e_1_2_7_9_2 e_1_2_7_8_2 e_1_2_7_7_2 e_1_2_7_6_2 e_1_2_7_18_2 e_1_2_7_16_2 e_1_2_7_15_2 e_1_2_7_13_2 e_1_2_7_12_2 e_1_2_7_11_2 e_1_2_7_10_2 Sanabria A (e_1_2_7_17_2) 2013; 2 Palanivelu C (e_1_2_7_14_2) 2007; 26 |
References_xml | – volume: 320 start-page: 970 issue: 15 year: 1989 end-page: 973 ident: CR5 article-title: A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer publication-title: N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198904133201504 contributor: fullname: Steele – volume: 11 start-page: 1017 year: 1997 end-page: 1020 ident: CR1 article-title: Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s004649900515 contributor: fullname: Etienne – volume: 80 start-page: 235 year: 1993 ident: CR8 article-title: Sutureless laparoscopic treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800239 contributor: fullname: Lau – volume: 129 start-page: 578 issue: 10 year: 2004 end-page: 582 ident: CR4 article-title: Non operative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer: results of a prospective study publication-title: Ann Chir doi: 10.1016/j.anchir.2004.06.012 contributor: fullname: Foulatier – volume: 24 start-page: 299 issue: 3 year: 2000 end-page: 306 ident: CR6 article-title: Surgical treatment of complicated duodenal ulcers: controlled trials publication-title: World J Surg doi: 10.1007/s002689910048 contributor: fullname: Borie – ident: CR16 – volume: 19 start-page: 153 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 156 ident: CR17 article-title: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer with delayed presentation publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0328 contributor: fullname: Shah – volume: 9 start-page: 898 year: 1995 end-page: 901 ident: CR10 article-title: Effect of pneumoperitoneum on the extent and severity of peritonitis induced by gastric ulcer perforation in the rat publication-title: Surg Endosc contributor: fullname: Treu – volume: 77 start-page: 1006 year: 1990 ident: CR2 article-title: Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770916 contributor: fullname: Vignal – volume: 13 start-page: 679 year: 1999 end-page: 682 ident: CR12 article-title: Open versus laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s004649901072 contributor: fullname: Johnsen – volume: 35 start-page: 1873 year: 2011 end-page: 1878 ident: CR14 article-title: Laparoscopic simple closure alone is adequate for low risk patients with perforated peptic ulcer publication-title: World J Surg doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1106-7 contributor: fullname: Huang – volume: 224 start-page: 131 issue: 2 year: 1996 end-page: 138 ident: CR15 article-title: A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/00000658-199608000-00004 contributor: fullname: Kwong – volume: 235 start-page: 313 issue: 3 year: 2002 end-page: 319 ident: CR9 article-title: Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001 contributor: fullname: Law – volume: 165 start-page: 566 issue: 6 year: 1999 end-page: 572 ident: CR7 article-title: Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic ulcer perforation publication-title: Eur J Surg doi: 10.1080/110241599750006479 contributor: fullname: Zilling – volume: 24 start-page: 1231 year: 2010 end-page: 1239 ident: CR11 article-title: Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0765-z contributor: fullname: Lange – volume: 26 start-page: 64 year: 2007 end-page: 66 ident: CR13 article-title: Laparoscopic management of duodenal ulcer perforation: is it advantageous? publication-title: Indian J Gastroenterol contributor: fullname: Senthilnathan – volume: 4 start-page: 232 year: 1990 end-page: 233 ident: CR3 article-title: Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/BF00316801 contributor: fullname: Cuschieri – volume: 235 start-page: 313 issue: 3 year: 2002 end-page: 319 article-title: Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 24 start-page: 299 issue: 3 year: 2000 end-page: 306 article-title: Surgical treatment of complicated duodenal ulcers: controlled trials publication-title: World J Surg – volume: 9 start-page: 898 year: 1995 end-page: 901 article-title: Effect of pneumoperitoneum on the extent and severity of peritonitis induced by gastric ulcer perforation in the rat publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 224 start-page: 131 issue: 2 year: 1996 end-page: 138 article-title: A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 165 start-page: 566 issue: 6 year: 1999 end-page: 572 article-title: Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic ulcer perforation publication-title: Eur J Surg – volume: 24 start-page: 1231 year: 2010 end-page: 1239 article-title: Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 4 start-page: 232 year: 1990 end-page: 233 article-title: Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 35 start-page: 1873 year: 2011 end-page: 1878 article-title: Laparoscopic simple closure alone is adequate for low risk patients with perforated peptic ulcer publication-title: World J Surg – volume: 2 start-page: CD004778 year: 2013 article-title: Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 19 start-page: 153 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 156 article-title: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer with delayed presentation publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech – volume: 77 start-page: 1006 year: 1990 article-title: Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 80 start-page: 235 year: 1993 article-title: Sutureless laparoscopic treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 11 start-page: 1017 year: 1997 end-page: 1020 article-title: Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 129 start-page: 578 issue: 10 year: 2004 end-page: 582 article-title: Non operative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer: results of a prospective study publication-title: Ann Chir – volume: 13 start-page: 679 year: 1999 end-page: 682 article-title: Open versus laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 320 start-page: 970 issue: 15 year: 1989 end-page: 973 article-title: A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer publication-title: N Engl J Med. – volume: 26 start-page: 64 year: 2007 end-page: 66 article-title: Laparoscopic management of duodenal ulcer perforation: is it advantageous? publication-title: Indian J Gastroenterol – ident: e_1_2_7_6_2 doi: 10.1056/NEJM198904133201504 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_2 doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800239 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_2 doi: 10.1007/s00464‐009‐0765‐z – ident: e_1_2_7_7_2 doi: 10.1007/s002689910048 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_2 doi: 10.1080/110241599750006479 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_2 doi: 10.1007/s00268‐011‐1106‐7 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_2 doi: 10.1016/j.anchir.2004.06.012 – volume: 2 start-page: CD004778 year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_7_17_2 article-title: Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev contributor: fullname: Sanabria A – ident: e_1_2_7_4_2 doi: 10.1007/BF00316801 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_2 doi: 10.1007/BF00768887 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_2 doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770916 – volume: 26 start-page: 64 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_7_14_2 article-title: Laparoscopic management of duodenal ulcer perforation: is it advantageous? publication-title: Indian J Gastroenterol contributor: fullname: Palanivelu C – ident: e_1_2_7_2_2 doi: 10.1007/s004649900515 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_2 doi: 10.1097/00000658‐199608000‐00004 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_2 doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0328 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_2 doi: 10.1007/s004649901072 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_2 doi: 10.1097/00000658‐200203000‐00001 |
SSID | ssj0017606 |
Score | 2.350009 |
Snippet | Backgrounds
The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic... The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic approach to... Backgrounds The incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic... BACKGROUNDSThe incidence of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased during the last decades. At the same time, a laparoscopic... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed wiley springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 948 |
SubjectTerms | Abdominal Surgery Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cardiac Surgery Conversion to Open Surgery - statistics & numerical data Duodenal Fistula Female General Surgery Humans Laparoscopic Approach Laparoscopy Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Operative Time Original Scientific Report Peptic Ulcer Perforation - surgery Perforated Peptic Ulcer Peritoneal Lavage Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Retrospective Studies Romania - epidemiology Surgery Taylor Method Thoracic Surgery Vascular Surgery Young Adult |
Title | Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Retrospective Study |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00268-016-3821-6 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1007%2Fs00268-016-3821-6 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27882415 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1875684314 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1843968111 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1881751604 |
Volume | 41 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS-QwFD54gWVfvO3F8UYFn1aytGmatL6NOnUUFUFl960kaQKy0pHRefDfe06nLcruKtqXFhra0-Qk5_t6LgHYscqktCUNo9pRSFCsYMbImGmjE-HjMvOe8p2Hl-r8d3o4oDI5vPt1Uf352Xok64W6y3UjtkBxV5LFKY-YnIV5ND0J6vZ8f3AyPO18B0qGjYdSMEQvcevL_NdDXlqjvyDmM_foS_BaW5988SNyL8FCgzWD_lQ5lmHGVSvw6azxpn-B_BQtJVWzHN3d2AChuL4ZBwhig4s65h1RaImXuKbY4PrWuvFe0MdWD-NRm54ZUBTi41e4zgdXB0PW7KvArEACwSKhEis596EwPBOCR95q610cGjzKiJeliYzNEktFJxVBLK-Qt4WJtYIw4zeYq0aVW4VAl16YVDvplBYlJfVm2nkrTGiRyCjTgx9t_xZ30_IZRVcoue6ZgkLMqGcK2YONdgSKZibdFxESKpkizBE92O5u4xwgx4au3GhCbRBWyRSX7dfapIiUIhnic75PR7eTiCvkGYhkerDbjuEzAf4vLq814u0PK36dXO7nBLaytXe9Yh0-c4IRdaTQBsw9jCduE2bvy8lWo_V0Pr46yp8A2nT4AA |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,27933,27934,41073,42142,48344,48347,48357,49649,49652,49662,52153 |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3NT9swFMCfRpHYLmOMwcpnkDgxWUoc1064FUYoUBASRewW2Y4tIaEWlfaw_5730iQCDZggp0ixnOfv39P7MMCuVSahK2kY5Y5CBcUKZoyMmTa6I3xcpN5TvHPvSl38SX4fUZqcuI6FKb3da5NkuVM3wW6kLpDjlWRxwiMm52BepFLgVJ7vngyOs8Z4oGRYmSgFQ3yJa2PmS5U8P47-Ycwn9tHn9FoeP9nihwT_Bl8r2gy6s-mxBJ_c8DssnFf29GXI-nhWUj7L0f2tDRDG9e04QIwNLkuvd-TQAl9xV7HB9Z114_2gi6Um41EdoBmQH-LfH3CdHQ0Oe6y6WYFZgSoEi4TqWMm5D4XhqRA88lZb7-LQ4FNEvChMZGzasZR2UhFkeYWaW9ixVhA1rkBrOBq6nxDowguTaCed0qKgsN5UO2-FCS2qMsq0Ya_u4Px-lkAjb1Illz2Tk5MZ9Uwu27BRD0FeraWHPEKVSiYIOqINO81nXAVk2tBDN5pSGQQrmeDG_VaZBFkpkiHWszob3kYirlDTQJZpw696DJ8I8Lq4vJwS_29YfnN6dZARbqVr7_rFNnzuDc77ef_k4mwdvnCCitJvaANak_HUbcLcQzHdqpbAI_5a-mI |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpZ3bS9xAFIcPXkD6Uu3NrtU2Qp9aBpPJ7Ezii6y6YWtXEay0b2GuIJTssu4-9L_vOdkkKL2ImKdAhslkrt-PcwnAR6tMRr-kYZQ7CgWKFcwYmTJtdF-E1OUhULzz6Epd_MhOh5Qm56iNham93VuT5DKmgbI0VfODqQsHXeAbSQdywpIszXjC5CqsCxQyONHXB8Oz0bgzJCgZN-ZKwRBl0taw-bdK7h9Nf_DmHVvpfZKtj6Ji88kfsQXPGwqNBstp8wJWfPUSNs4bO_srKMZ4hlKey8n0xkYI6fpmFiHeRpe1NzzyqcNb3G1sdP3T-tlhNMBS89mkDdyMyD_x12u4LobfTkas-eMCswKlBUuE6lvJeYiF4bkQPAlW2-DT2ODlEu6cSYzN-5bSUSqCr6BQ0cV9awXR5BtYqyaVfwuRdkGYTHvplRaOwn1z7YMVJrYocZTpwae2s8vpMrFG2aVQrnumJOcz6plS9mC3HY6yWWO3ZYJSS2YIQKIH-91jXB1k8tCVnyyoDAKXzHBD_1-ZDBkqkTHWs70c6q5FXKECQcbpwed2PO804N_N5fX0ePjDyu9nV8cFYVi-86hXfICNy9OiHH-5-PoOnnFijdqdaBfW5rOF34PVW7d436yG30vLAzQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic+Repair+for+Perforated+Peptic+Ulcer%3A+A+Retrospective+Study&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+surgery&rft.au=V%C4%83rcu%C5%9F%2C+Flore&rft.au=Beuran%2C+Mircea&rft.au=Lica%2C+Ioan&rft.au=Turculet%2C+Claudiu&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.pub=Springer+International+Publishing&rft.issn=0364-2313&rft.eissn=1432-2323&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=948&rft.epage=953&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00268-016-3821-6&rft.externalDBID=10.1007%252Fs00268-016-3821-6&rft.externalDocID=WJSBF08209 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon |