Two- versus three-dimensional quantum confinement in indium phosphide wires and dots

The size dependence of the bandgap is the most identifiable aspect of quantum confinement in semiconductors; the bandgap increases as the nanostructure size decreases. The bandgaps in one-dimensional (1D)-confined wells, 2D-confined wires, and 3D-confined dots should evolve differently with size as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature materials Vol. 2; no. 8; pp. 517 - 520
Main Authors: Wang, Lin-Wang, Buhro, William E, Yu, Heng, Li, Jingbo, Loomis, Richard A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Nature Publishing Group 01-08-2003
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The size dependence of the bandgap is the most identifiable aspect of quantum confinement in semiconductors; the bandgap increases as the nanostructure size decreases. The bandgaps in one-dimensional (1D)-confined wells, 2D-confined wires, and 3D-confined dots should evolve differently with size as a result of the differing dimensionality of confinement. However, no systematic experimental comparisons of analogous 1D, 2D or 3D confinement systems have been made. Here we report growth of indium phosphide (InP) quantum wires having diameters in the strong-confinement regime, and a comparison of their bandgaps with those previously reported for InP quantum dots. We provide theoretical evidence to establish that the quantum confinement observed in the InP wires is weakened to the expected extent, relative to that in InP dots, by the loss of one confinement dimension. Quantum wires sometimes behave as strings of quantum dots, and we propose an analysis to generally distinguish quantum-wire from quantum-dot behaviour.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1476-1122
1476-4660
DOI:10.1038/nmat942