Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection

Background and methods: The comparative benefits and drawbacks of straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA), colonic $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch and coloplasty anastomosis after anterior resection are uncertain. Studies published between 1986 and 2005 of colonic $\font\ss=cmss10 scale...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of surgery Vol. 93; no. 1; pp. 19 - 32
Main Authors: Heriot, A. G., Tekkis, P. P., Constantinides, V., Paraskevas, P., Nicholls, R. J., Darzi, A., Fazio, V. W.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01-01-2006
Wiley
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and methods: The comparative benefits and drawbacks of straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA), colonic $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch and coloplasty anastomosis after anterior resection are uncertain. Studies published between 1986 and 2005 of colonic $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch versus transverse coloplasty or straight CAA were analysed. Endpoints included postoperative complications, and functional and physiological outcomes measured within 6 months, 1 year and 2 years or more after the procedure. A random‐effect model was used to aggregate the study endpoints and assess heterogeneity. Results: Thirty‐five studies containing 2240 patients (1066 straight CAA, 1050 $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch and 124 coloplasty) were included. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the three groups. There was a significant reduction in the frequency of defaecation per day by 1·88, 1·35 and 0·74 motions at the three time intervals in the $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch group compared with the straight CAA group. Faecal urgency was less prevalent in patients with a $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch than those with a straight CAA (odds ratio 0·27 at 6 months or less and 0·21 at 1 year). There was no difference in functional outcome between $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch and coloplasty anastomosis. Conclusions: The colonic $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch provided functional benefits over straight anastomosis with no increase in postoperative complications. Coloplasty appeared to have similar benefits but further studies are required for validation. Copyright © 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch advocated
Bibliography:istex:9AF6A1A5FB036895F256C89378A59947957541F4
ark:/67375/WNG-WSQ644TX-4
ArticleID:BJS5188
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1002/bjs.5188