HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response): a novel clinical endpoint to evaluate therapeutic outcomes in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa from the placebo-controlled portion of a phase 2 adalimumab study

Background Determining treatment response for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can be challenging due to limitations of current disease activity evaluations. Objective Evaluate the novel, validated endpoint, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) and its utility as an outcome...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Vol. 30; no. 6; pp. 989 - 994
Main Authors: Kimball, A.B., Sobell, J.M., Zouboulis, C.C., Gu, Y., Williams, D.A., Sundaram, M., Teixeira, H.D., Jemec, G.B.E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-06-2016
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Determining treatment response for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can be challenging due to limitations of current disease activity evaluations. Objective Evaluate the novel, validated endpoint, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) and its utility as an outcome measure. Methods Patients with baseline total abscess and inflammatory nodule count (AN count) of at least three and draining fistula count of 20 or fewer comprised the post hoc subpopulation analysed. HiSCR (at least a 50% reduction in total AN count, with no increase in abscess count, and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline) and HS‐PGA Response [Hidradenitis Suppurativa‐Physician's Global Assessment score of clear, minimal, or mild, with at least a 2‐grade improvement from baseline] were used to evaluate patient response after adalimumab treatment weekly, every other week, or placebo (1 : 1 : 1). Results The subpopulation included 132 (85.7%) patients; 70.5% women and 73.5% white. At week 16, HiSCR was achieved by 54.5% receiving weekly adalimumab, 33.3% every other week, and 25.6% placebo and HS‐PGA Response was achieved by 20.5% receiving weekly adalimumab, 6.7% every other week and 2.3% placebo. Conclusion HiSCR was more responsive to change than HS‐PGA Response in this subpopulation.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-LR5Q6V03-K
Celgene
Amgen
Eli Lilly
LVMH
Dermira
Immundiagnostik AG
General Topics
istex:215536D618B5A314BED3156E1AEC2558DFB2ECCA
Intendis
Merck
Stiefel/GSK
Glenmark
Janssen
Almirall
MSD
Galderma
Biogen-Idec
Janssen-Cilag
Merz
Leo Pharma
Astra-Zeneca
Pfizer
Bayer Health Care
BMS
Acetlion
Bioderma
AbbVie
ArticleID:JDV13216
Novartis
Pierre Fabre
UCB
Leo
Funding/Support
Conflicts of Interest
AbbVie Inc. funded this study and participated in the design and conduct of the study, in the collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data, in the preparation, review and approval of the manuscript, and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. All authors were involved in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication, and had the right to accept or reject comments or suggestions. AbbVie also sponsored two phase 3 trials of adalimumab treatment for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa.
A Kimball has received honoraria and payments for serving as a consultant and investigator for AbbVie, Janssen and Amgen, and has received fellowship funding from Janssen. J Sobell has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen and Janssen, for serving on advisory boards and as a speaker, and has received grants from Amgen, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Celgene, Novartis and Merck for serving as an investigator. C Zouboulis has received honoraria from AbbVie and Stiefel/GSK for his participation on advisory boards and as an investigator and speaker, from Dermira and Galderma for his participation on advisory boards, from Leo for his participation as a consultant, and from Almirall, Bayer Health Care, Bioderma, Biogen‐Idec, General Topics, Glenmark and Pierre Fabre for his participation as a speaker; his department received grants from AbbVie, Astra‐Zeneca, Biogen‐Idec, BMS, Immundiagnostik AG, Leo Pharma, LVMH, Merz, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and UCB for his participation as an investigator, and from Intendis for his participation on an advisory board. G Jemec has received honoraria from AbbVie, Astra‐Zeneca, Pfizer, Novartis and MSD for serving on ad boards, and has received grants from AbbVie, Leo Pharma, Acetlion and Janssen‐Cilag for serving as an investigator. Y Gu, D Williams, M Sundaram and H Teixeira are employed by AbbVie and own AbbVie stock or receive AbbVie stock options.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.13216