Imprinted polymers for chiral resolution of (±)-ephedrine, 4: Packed column supercritical fluid chromatography using molecularly imprinted chiral stationary phases

• Published in: Journal of Chromatography A Vol. 1264; pp. 117 - 123
• Main Authors: Ansell, Richard J., Kuah, Janice K.L., Wang, Dongyao, Jackson, Clare E., Bartle, Keith D., Clifford, Anthony A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 16-11-2012
• Subjects: Carbon dioxide; Chiral separation; Chromatography; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid - methods; Diffusivity; Enantiomers; Ephedrine; Ephedrine - chemistry; high performance liquid chromatography; Imprinted polymers; Liquids; Molecular Imprinting; Molecularly imprinted polymers; Phases; polymers; Polymers - chemistry; Separation; Stereoisomerism; Supercritical fluid chromatography; Supercritical fluids; viscosity; Molecularly imprinted polymers; Enantiomers; Chiral separation; Ephedrine; Carbon dioxide; Supercritical fluid chromatography
• ISSN: 0021-9673; 1873-3778
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.09.069

► MIPs successfully used as stationary phases in separation of (±)-ephedrine by SFC. ► MIPs are stable under the conditions used and the chromatography is reproducible. ► Better separations achieved with the best MIP in SFC than with any of them in HPLC. ► The mobile phase is carbon dioxide with a modifier of methanol/isopropylamine/water.
(−)-Ephedrine-molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) have been successfully used as stationary phases in supercritical fluid chromatography for the separation of (±)-ephedrine enantiomers. This approach combines the simple preparation and predictable elution order of MIP stationary phases with the superior mobile phase diffusivity and low viscosity of supercritical fluid mobile phases. The optimised mobile phase comprised supercritical carbon dioxide with a modifier consisting of MeOH/isopropylamine/H2O 93:5:2 (v/v/v). In many cases, better resolution separations were observed compared to when liquid mobile phases were used, and better separations achieved at high sample loads, although interestingly the MIPs which work best in SFC are different from the MIPs that work best in HPLC with an amine modifier. The MIP stationary phases were stable under the conditions employed and the chromatography was reproducible. This work opens the door to exploiting MIP stationary phases in preparative SFC.