Acute and sublethal effects of two insecticides on earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris L.) under laboratory conditions
Earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris L.) were exposed to commercial formulations of endosulfan and aldicarb for 2, 7, and 15 days, and the LC10, LC25, and LC50 were determined. Worms were then exposed to LC10, LC25, and LC50 concentrations of endosulfan and LC10 and LC25 concentrations of aldicarb. The...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental toxicology Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 1 - 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
2003
Wiley |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris L.) were exposed to commercial formulations of endosulfan and aldicarb for 2, 7, and 15 days, and the LC10, LC25, and LC50 were determined. Worms were then exposed to LC10, LC25, and LC50 concentrations of endosulfan and LC10 and LC25 concentrations of aldicarb. The growth rate and total protein content were determined and related to endosulfan and aldicarb residues in soil and earthworms. Aldicarb was more toxic than endosulfan under the experimental conditions. The residues of endosulfan and aldicarb caused a significant reduction in the growth rate and total protein content of earthworms. The residues of endosulfan and aldicarb were monitored in soil and earthworms after 2, 7, and 15 days of exposure. The residues remaining in the soil after the experiments ranged between 37.75% and 68.54% of the applied concentration for endosulfan and between 10.13% and 67.71% of the applied concentration for aldicarb. Small amounts of both insecticides were detected in worms, and accumulation was more important for endosulfan. This study proposes the use of growth rate and total protein content as biomarkers for contamination by endosulfan and aldicarb. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 18: 1–8, 2003. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:TOX10095 ark:/67375/WNG-CCXXCDVB-N istex:38E696D407EF8D97032F32E34F66F0777402FD5D French Ministère de la Recherche et des Technologies through the program Unité de Recherches Vigne et Vin de Champagne - No. UPRES-EA 2069 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1520-4081 1522-7278 |
DOI: | 10.1002/tox.10095 |