Diagnosis and outcome of acute respiratory failure in immunocompromised patients after bronchoscopy

We wished to explore the use, diagnostic capability and outcomes of bronchoscopy added to noninvasive testing in immunocompromised patients. In this setting, an inability to identify the cause of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure is associated with worse outcome. Every effort should be made to ob...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The European respiratory journal Vol. 54; no. 1; p. 1802442
Main Authors: Bauer, Philippe R, Chevret, Sylvie, Yadav, Hemang, Mehta, Sangeeta, Pickkers, Peter, Bukan, Ramin B, Rello, Jordi, van de Louw, Andry, Klouche, Kada, Meert, Anne-Pascale, Martin-Loeches, Ignacio, Marsh, Brian, Socias Crespi, Lorenzo, Moreno-Gonzalez, Gabriel, Buchtele, Nina, Amrein, Karin, Balik, Martin, Antonelli, Massimo, Nyunga, Martine, Barratt-Due, Andreas, Bergmans, Dennis C J J, Spoelstra-de Man, Angélique M E, Kuitunen, Anne, Wallet, Florent, Seguin, Amelie, Metaxa, Victoria, Lemiale, Virginie, Burghi, Gaston, Demoule, Alexandre, Karvunidis, Thomas, Cotoia, Antonella, Klepstad, Pål, Møller, Ann M, Mokart, Djamel, Azoulay, Elie
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England European Respiratory Society 01-07-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We wished to explore the use, diagnostic capability and outcomes of bronchoscopy added to noninvasive testing in immunocompromised patients. In this setting, an inability to identify the cause of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure is associated with worse outcome. Every effort should be made to obtain a diagnosis, either with noninvasive testing alone or combined with bronchoscopy. However, our understanding of the risks and benefits of bronchoscopy remains uncertain. This was a pre-planned secondary analysis of Efraim, a prospective, multinational, observational study of 1611 immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We compared patients with noninvasive testing only to those who had also received bronchoscopy by bivariate analysis and after propensity score matching. Bronchoscopy was performed in 618 (39%) patients who were more likely to have haematological malignancy and a higher severity of illness score. Bronchoscopy alone achieved a diagnosis in 165 patients (27% adjusted diagnostic yield). Bronchoscopy resulted in a management change in 236 patients (38% therapeutic yield). Bronchoscopy was associated with worsening of respiratory status in 69 (11%) patients. Bronchoscopy was associated with higher ICU (40% 28%; p<0.0001) and hospital mortality (49% 41%; p=0.003). The overall rate of undiagnosed causes was 13%. After propensity score matching, bronchoscopy remained associated with increased risk of hospital mortality (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.08-1.81). Bronchoscopy was associated with improved diagnosis and changes in management, but also increased hospital mortality. Balancing risk and benefit in individualised cases should be investigated further.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0903-1936
1399-3003
DOI:10.1183/13993003.02442-2018