Healthcare reforms in Cyprus 2013–2017: Does the crisis mark the end of the healthcare sector as we know it?
•Changes in the healthcare sector were introduced as part of a bailout agreement.•These included budget cuts, copayments, clinical guidelines and revision of beneficiary criteria.•Co-payments delivered conflicting results and their framework should be reassessed.•Further reforms are needed, and Cypr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Health policy (Amsterdam) Vol. 122; no. 2; pp. 75 - 80 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ireland
Elsevier B.V
01-02-2018
Elsevier Science Ltd |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Changes in the healthcare sector were introduced as part of a bailout agreement.•These included budget cuts, copayments, clinical guidelines and revision of beneficiary criteria.•Co-payments delivered conflicting results and their framework should be reassessed.•Further reforms are needed, and Cyprus must implement universal health coverage.
As part of a bailout agreement with the International Monetary Fund, the European Commission and the European Central Bank (known as the Troika), Cyprus had to achieve a fiscal surplus through budget constraints and efficiency enhancement. As a result, a number of policy changes were implemented, including a reform of the healthcare sector, and major healthcare reforms are planned for the upcoming years, mainly via the introduction of a National Health System. This paper presents the healthcare sector, provides an overview of recent reforms, assesses the recently implemented policies and proposes further interventions. Recent reforms targeting the demand and supply side included the introduction of clinical guidelines, user charges, introduction of coding for Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) and the revision of public healthcare coverage criteria. The latter led to a reduction in the number of people with public healthcare coverage in a time of financial crises, when this is needed the most, while co-payments must be reassessed to avoid creating barriers to access. However, DRGs and clinical guidelines can help improve performance and efficiency. The changes so far are yet to mark the end of the healthcare sector as we know it. A universal public healthcare system must remain a priority and must be introduced swiftly to address important existing coverage gaps. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0168-8510 1872-6054 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.11.004 |