Barriers and Facilitators to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in Rural Ontario, Canada: The Role of Self‐Collected HPV Testing
PURPOSE: The addition of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing to primary cervical cancer screening provides an opportunity to employ less invasive cervical cancer screening modalities. The objective of this study was to explore the initial reaction and perception to HPV self‐collected testing, in the...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of rural health Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 136 - 145 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Journal of Rural Health
01-03-2016
Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | PURPOSE: The addition of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing to primary cervical cancer screening provides an opportunity to employ less invasive cervical cancer screening modalities. The objective of this study was to explore the initial reaction and perception to HPV self‐collected testing, in the context of current barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening, among women in an underscreened community in rural Ontario. METHODS: Age‐stratified focus groups were conducted with women 18‐70 years of age in rural Ontario to discuss cervical cancer screening. Women were recruited using purposive sampling of underscreened women and women in the general community. Qualitative thematic analysis of focus group transcripts identified the barriers, facilitators, and role of HPV self‐collected testing for cervical cancer screening. RESULTS: Four focus groups were conducted with a total of 25 women. Overall, women were very positive toward self‐collected HPV testing. HPV self‐collected testing was felt to address many of the logistical (eg, inconvenient clinic hours, lack of time) and procedural barriers (embarrassment, lack of social distance in a small town) to current screening practices. However, self‐collected HPV testing does not address barriers related to cervical cancer knowledge (eg, fear of cancer). Women identified issues related to test reliability, confidence in the ability to self‐collect, and education around testing that would need to be addressed prior to implementation. Generational differences were noted in the acceptability of self‐collected HPV testing between older and younger women. CONCLUSIONS: HPV self‐collected testing was perceived as a facilitator for screening, and it was well accepted in this rural community. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12136 istex:EAC01E368B2A3C57A0DC419C919BD6C1408C9C41 Integrated Cancer Screening Program at Cancer Care Ontario ArticleID:JRH12136 University of Toronto, Dalla Lana School of Public Health ark:/67375/WNG-68RQ7F94-Z Conflicts of Interest This study was funded by the Integrated Cancer Screening Program at Cancer Care Ontario. C. Sarai Racey received doctoral stipend support through the University of Toronto, Dalla Lana School of Public Health. Acknowledgments The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Funding We thank the participants, the Mount Forest Health Team and the Claire Stewart Medical Centre. Thank you to the Provincial Under‐Never Screened Research Team, specifically Brooke Filsinger for her assistance in facilitating the focus groups and Joan Antal for her contributions to initial analysis. We wish to thank Eve Medical for providing self‐collected testing devices (HerSwab) for demonstration purposes. A special thank you to Dr. Ann Burchell and Dr. Tom Wong for their review of the study design. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0890-765X 1748-0361 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jrh.12136 |