Fit perceptions in the employment interview: The role of similarity, liking, and expectations

We examined (1) how interviewers construct fit perceptions about applicants and (2) the relationship between these perceptions and actual hiring recommendations. It was hypothesized that actual demographic similarity and human capital similarity would indirectly affect fit perceptions. These fit per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of occupational and organizational psychology Vol. 81; no. 2; pp. 173 - 189
Main Authors: García, M. F., Posthuma, R. A., Colella, A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-06-2008
British Psychological Society
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We examined (1) how interviewers construct fit perceptions about applicants and (2) the relationship between these perceptions and actual hiring recommendations. It was hypothesized that actual demographic similarity and human capital similarity would indirectly affect fit perceptions. These fit perceptions would be predicted by the interviewer's perceived similarity to applicants, mediated by two factors: interviewers' liking of the applicant and interviewers' expectations of applicant performance. Actual interviewer‐applicant dyads (N=118) were studied. The results indicated that the relationship between perceived similarity and fit perceptions is mediated by performance expectations but not by liking. This study provides evidence that interviewers are more rational than previous research suggested. However, the fact that human resource interviewers are more likely to perceive applicants as similar to themselves than line interviewers suggests that interviewers' neutrality is questioned.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JOOP338
ark:/67375/WNG-QRQG8L03-X
istex:1B944BF26F22A569E334F541521DDB8CE00FBF64
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0963-1798
2044-8325
DOI:10.1348/096317907X238708