Primary Treatment of Acute Dacryocystitis by Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with Silicone Intubation Guided by a Soft Probe

Purpose To investigate the suitability of cold steel endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EES-DCR) with circular bicanalicular intubation with silicone tubes (CBIST) guided by a soft probe for the primary treatment of acute purulent dacryocystitis (APD). Design Prospective, randomized, interv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Vol. 116; no. 1; pp. 116 - 122
Main Authors: Wu, Wencan, MD, PhD, Yan, Wentao, BS, MacCallum, Julia K., BS, Tu, Yunhai, MS, Jiang, Alice C, Yang, Yuan, MS, Xiao, Tianlin, MD, PhD, Li, Jin, MD, PhD, Wang, Qinmei, BS, Qu, Jia, MS
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 2009
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To investigate the suitability of cold steel endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EES-DCR) with circular bicanalicular intubation with silicone tubes (CBIST) guided by a soft probe for the primary treatment of acute purulent dacryocystitis (APD). Design Prospective, randomized, interventional case series. Participants Seventy-two patients (59 females, 13 males) with a median presenting age of 55±12 years (range, 28–71 years). Methods Eighty-four patients with unilateral APD were equally and randomly divided into 2 groups. Cold steel EES-DCR was performed after the lacrimal abscess formation, and external dacryocystorhinostomy (E-DCR) was performed 1 to 2 weeks after resolution of the acute inflammation. In both groups, CBIST guided by a soft probe was performed and the silicone tubes were kept in the lacrimal passages for 3 months. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months. Outcomes were compared between both groups, considering resolution time for external acute inflammation, success rate of free lacrimal passage reconstruction, and lack of complications as indicators of treatment suitability. Main Outcome Measures Time for resolution of the external acute inflammation, success rate of free lacrimal passage reconstruction, and complications. Results In this study, complete postoperative data were acquired from 40 patients in the EES-DCR group and from 32 patients in the E-DCR group, and the outcomes were compared. Acute inflammation resolved more quickly in the EES-DCR group than in the E-DCR group ( P <0.05). Ostium patency at 12 months after silicone tube removal was achieved in significantly more patients in the EES-DCR group (36/40 [90%]) than in the E-DCR group (21/32 [65.7%]; P <0.01). In the EES-DCR group, lacrimal passage reconstruction failed because of intranasal ostial closure in 3 patients and because of common canaliculus obstruction in 1 patient. In the E-DCR group, lacrimal passage reconstruction failed because of intranasal ostial closure in 3 patients, lacrimal sac fibrosis, granulation, or both in 6 patients, and common canaliculus obstruction in 2 patients. Other than the slight laceration of the inferior puncta, no significant complications arose from the treatments. Conclusions Cold steel EES-DCR with CBIST guided by a soft probe is a promising alternative for the primary treatment of APD with abscess formation. Financial Disclosure(s) The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0161-6420
1549-4713
DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.041