Marine reserves and optimal harvesting

Advocates of no‐take marine reserves emphasize their conservation benefits. Critics counter that reserves would decrease fisheries yield. Analysis of a spatially explicit harvesting model, however, shows that no‐take marine reserves are always part of an optimal harvest designed to maximize yield. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology letters Vol. 6; no. 9; pp. 843 - 849
Main Author: Neubert, Michael G.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01-09-2003
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Advocates of no‐take marine reserves emphasize their conservation benefits. Critics counter that reserves would decrease fisheries yield. Analysis of a spatially explicit harvesting model, however, shows that no‐take marine reserves are always part of an optimal harvest designed to maximize yield. The optimal harvest generates a spatial source–sink structure with source populations placed in reserves. The sizes and locations of the optimal reserves depend on a dimensionless length parameter. For small values of this parameter, the maximum yield is obtained by placing a large reserve in the centre of the habitat. For large values of this parameter, the optimal harvesting strategy is a spatial ‘chattering control’ with infinite sequences of reserves alternating with areas of intense fishing. Such a chattering strategy would be impossible to actually implement, but in these cases an approximate yet practicable policy, utilizing a small number of reserves, can be constructed.
Bibliography:istex:BD77C9DD3C6E1D96A2CD97A1217AECF2B44B4B5B
ark:/67375/WNG-6BC4V5Z5-2
ArticleID:ELE493
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1461-023X
1461-0248
DOI:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00493.x