Marine reserves and optimal harvesting
Advocates of no‐take marine reserves emphasize their conservation benefits. Critics counter that reserves would decrease fisheries yield. Analysis of a spatially explicit harvesting model, however, shows that no‐take marine reserves are always part of an optimal harvest designed to maximize yield. T...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology letters Vol. 6; no. 9; pp. 843 - 849 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Science Ltd
01-09-2003
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Advocates of no‐take marine reserves emphasize their conservation benefits. Critics counter that reserves would decrease fisheries yield. Analysis of a spatially explicit harvesting model, however, shows that no‐take marine reserves are always part of an optimal harvest designed to maximize yield. The optimal harvest generates a spatial source–sink structure with source populations placed in reserves. The sizes and locations of the optimal reserves depend on a dimensionless length parameter. For small values of this parameter, the maximum yield is obtained by placing a large reserve in the centre of the habitat. For large values of this parameter, the optimal harvesting strategy is a spatial ‘chattering control’ with infinite sequences of reserves alternating with areas of intense fishing. Such a chattering strategy would be impossible to actually implement, but in these cases an approximate yet practicable policy, utilizing a small number of reserves, can be constructed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:BD77C9DD3C6E1D96A2CD97A1217AECF2B44B4B5B ark:/67375/WNG-6BC4V5Z5-2 ArticleID:ELE493 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1461-023X 1461-0248 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00493.x |