Validity and Reliability of a Novel Smartphone Tele-Assessment Solution for Quantifying Hip Range of Motion

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 22; no. 21; p. 8154
• Main Authors: Marshall, Charlotte J, El-Ansary, Doa, Pranata, Adrian, Ganderton, Charlotte, O’Donnell, John, Takla, Amir, Tran, Phong, Wickramasinghe, Nilmini, Tirosh, Oren
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 25-10-2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Biomechanics; Care and treatment; Communication; hip range of motion; Laboratories; Motion capture; Pandemics; Patient satisfaction; Patients; Prone position; Range of motion; Real time; Rehabilitation; Reliability analysis; Rotation; Sitting position; Smart phones; smartphone; Smartphones; tele-assessment; Telemedicine; Three dimensional motion; Validity; Webcams; Australia; United States; United States > US
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s22218154

Background: Tele-health has become a major mode of delivery in patient care, with increasing interest in the use of tele-platforms for remote patient assessment. The use of smartphone technology to measure hip range of motion has been reported previously, with good to excellent validity and reliability. However, these smartphone applications did not provide real-time tele-assessment functionality. We developed a novel smartphone application, the TelePhysio app, which allows the clinician to remotely connect to the patient’s device and measure their hip range of motion in real time. The aim of this study was to investigate the concurrent validity and between-sessions reliability of the TelePhysio app. In addition, the study investigated the concurrent validity, between-sessions, and inter-rater reliability of a second tele-assessment approach using video analysis. Methods: Fifteen participants (nfemales = 6) were assessed in our laboratory (session 1) and at their home (session 2). We assessed maximum voluntary active hip flexion in supine and hip internal and external rotation, in both prone and sitting positions. TelePhysio and video analysis were validated against the laboratory’s 3-dimensional motion capture system in session 1, and evaluated for between-sessions reliability in session 2. Video analysis inter-rater reliability was assessed by comparing the analysis of two raters in session 2. Results: The TelePhysio app demonstrated high concurrent validity against the 3D motion capture system (ICCs 0.63–0.83) for all hip movements in all positions, with the exception of hip internal rotation in prone (ICC = 0.48, p = 0.99). The video analysis demonstrated almost perfect concurrent validity against the 3D motion capture system (ICCs 0.85–0.94) for all hip movements in all positions, with the exception of hip internal rotation in prone (ICC = 0.44, p = 0.01). The TelePhysio and video analysis demonstrated good between-sessions reliability for hip external rotation and hip flexion, ICC 0.64 and 0.62, respectively. The between-sessions reliability of hip internal and external rotation for both TelePhysio and video analysis was fair (ICCs 0.36–0.63). Inter-rater reliability ICCs for the video analysis were 0.59 for hip flexion and 0.87–0.95 for the hip rotation range. Conclusions: Both tele-assessment approaches, using either a smartphone application or video analysis, demonstrate good to excellent concurrent validity, and moderate to substantial between-sessions reliability in measuring hip rotation and flexion range of motion, but less in internal hip rotation in the prone position. Thus, it is recommended that the seated position be used when assessing hip internal rotation. The use of a smartphone to remotely assess hip range of motion is an appropriate, effective, and low-cost alternative to the face-to-face assessments. This method provides a simple, cost effective, and accessible patient assessment tool with no additional cost. This study validates the use of smartphone technology as a tele-assessment tool for remote hip range of motion assessment.