ESC sudden‐death risk model in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Incremental value of quantitative contrast‐enhanced CMR in intermediate‐risk patients
Background Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains the most common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the young; however, current strategies do not identify all HCM patients at risk. A novel validated algorithm was proposed by the last European Society of Cardiology guidelines to guide implant...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) Vol. 40; no. 10; pp. 853 - 860 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
Wiley Periodicals, Inc
01-10-2017
John Wiley & Sons, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains the most common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the young; however, current strategies do not identify all HCM patients at risk. A novel validated algorithm was proposed by the last European Society of Cardiology guidelines to guide implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Recently, extensive myocardial fibrosis was independently associated with increased risk of SCD events. This study aimed to establish the relation between myocardial fibrosis (late gadolinium enhancement [LGE] extension) and the novel SCD risk‐prediction model in a real population of HCM to evaluate its potential additional value in the different risk groups.
Hypothesis
There is a significant association between LGE extension and the novel SCD risk calculator that may help conflicting ICD decisions.
Methods
Seventy‐seven patients with HCM underwent routine clinical evaluation, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance study. Their SCD risk at 5 years was calculated using the new model.
Results
Extension of LGE positively correlated with SCD risk prediction (r = 0.7, P < 0.001). Low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk groups according to the model showed significantly different extent of LGE (5% ± 6% vs 18% ± 9% vs 17% ± 4%; P < 0.001). Four patients (6%) in the low‐risk group and 5 (62%) in the intermediate‐risk group showed extensive areas of LGE. All patients except 1 (86%) at highest risk (n = 6) showed extensive areas of LGE.
Conclusions
LGE extension is concordant with the novel SCD‐risk model defining low‐ and high‐risk groups; it may provide additional information, allowing better discrimination to support implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator decision. LGE quantification holds promise for SCD stratification in HCM. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0160-9289 1932-8737 |
DOI: | 10.1002/clc.22735 |