Unchanged nitrate and nitrite isotope fractionation during heterotrophic and Fe(II)-mixotrophic denitrification suggest a non-enzymatic link between denitrification and Fe(II) oxidation

Natural-abundance measurements of nitrate and nitrite (NO x ) isotope ratios (δ 15 N and δ 18 O) can be a valuable tool to study the biogeochemical fate of NO x species in the environment. A prerequisite for using NO x isotopes in this regard is an understanding of the mechanistic details of isotope...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in microbiology Vol. 13; p. 927475
Main Authors: Visser, Anna-Neva, Wankel, Scott D., Frey, Claudia, Kappler, Andreas, Lehmann, Moritz F.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A 02-09-2022
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Natural-abundance measurements of nitrate and nitrite (NO x ) isotope ratios (δ 15 N and δ 18 O) can be a valuable tool to study the biogeochemical fate of NO x species in the environment. A prerequisite for using NO x isotopes in this regard is an understanding of the mechanistic details of isotope fractionation ( 15 ε, 18 ε) associated with the biotic and abiotic NO x transformation processes involved (e.g., denitrification). However, possible impacts on isotope fractionation resulting from changing growth conditions during denitrification, different carbon substrates, or simply the presence of compounds that may be involved in NO x reduction as co-substrates [e.g., Fe(II)] remain uncertain. Here we investigated whether the type of organic substrate, i.e., short-chained organic acids, and the presence/absence of Fe(II) (mixotrophic vs. heterotrophic growth conditions) affect N and O isotope fractionation dynamics during nitrate (NO 3 – ) and nitrite (NO 2 – ) reduction in laboratory experiments with three strains of putative nitrate-dependent Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria and one canonical denitrifier. Our results revealed that 15 ε and 18 ε values obtained for heterotrophic ( 15 ε-NO 3 – : 17.6 ± 2.8‰, 18 ε-NO 3 – :18.1 ± 2.5‰; 15 ε-NO 2 – : 14.4 ± 3.2‰) vs. mixotrophic ( 15 ε-NO 3 – : 20.2 ± 1.4‰, 18 ε-NO 3 – : 19.5 ± 1.5‰; 15 ε-NO 2 – : 16.1 ± 1.4‰) growth conditions are very similar and fall within the range previously reported for classical heterotrophic denitrification. Moreover, availability of different short-chain organic acids (succinate vs. acetate), while slightly affecting the NO x reduction dynamics, did not produce distinct differences in N and O isotope effects. N isotope fractionation in abiotic controls, although exhibiting fluctuating results, even expressed transient inverse isotope dynamics ( 15 ε-NO 2 – : –12.4 ± 1.3 ‰). These findings imply that neither the mechanisms ordaining cellular uptake of short-chain organic acids nor the presence of Fe(II) seem to systematically impact the overall N and O isotope effect during NO x reduction. The similar isotope effects detected during mixotrophic and heterotrophic NO x reduction, as well as the results obtained from the abiotic controls, may not only imply that the enzymatic control of NO x reduction in putative NDFeOx bacteria is decoupled from Fe(II) oxidation, but also that Fe(II) oxidation is indirectly driven by biologically (i.e., via organic compounds) or abiotically (catalysis via reactive surfaces) mediated processes co-occurring during heterotrophic denitrification.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Microbiological Chemistry and Geomicrobiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Reviewed by: Satoshi Ishii, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, United States; Hans Karl Carlson, Berkeley Lab (DOE), United States
Edited by: Sukhwan Yoon, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea
Present address: Anna-Neva Visser, The Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences, Eilat and The Fredy and Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
ISSN:1664-302X
1664-302X
DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2022.927475