Physiological breeding for yield improvement in soybean: solar radiation interception-conversion, and harvest index

• Published in: Theoretical and applied genetics Vol. 135; no. 5; pp. 1477 - 1491
• Main Authors: Lopez, Miguel Angel, Moreira, Fabiana Freitas, Hearst, Anthony, Cherkauer, Keith, Rainey, Katy Martin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-05-2022; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Agriculture; Biochemistry; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biotechnology; Chlorophyll; Chromosome 11; Chromosome 13; Chromosome 7; Chromosomes; Crop yields; Dry matter; Gene mapping; Genetic aspects; Genetic diversity; Genetic relationship; Genome-Wide Association Study; Genomes; Genomics; Germplasm; Glycine max - genetics; Heritability; Inbreeding; Life Sciences; Light interception; Methods; Original Article; Phenotype; Phenotypic variations; Phenotyping; Physiological aspects; Physiology; Plant Biochemistry; Plant Breeding; Plant Breeding/Biotechnology; Plant Genetics and Genomics; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Production processes; Quantitative Trait Loci; Radiation; Seed set; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Solar radiation; Soybean; Soybeans; United States
• ISSN: 0040-5752; 1432-2242
• DOI: 10.1007/s00122-022-04048-5

Key message
Efficiency of light interception, Radiation use efficiency and harvest index can be used as targets to improve grain yield potential in soybean.
Grain yield (GY) production can be expressed as the result of three main efficiencies: light interception (Ei), radiation use (RUE), and harvest index (HI). Although dissecting GY through these three efficiencies is not entirely new, there is a lack of knowledge about the phenotypic variation, the genetic architecture, and the relative contribution of these three efficiencies on GY in soybean. This knowledge gap coupled with laborious phenotyping prevents the active consideration of these efficiencies into breeding programs. This study aims to reveal the phenotypic variation, heritability, genetic relationships, genetic architecture, and genomic prediction for Ei, RUE, and HI in soybean. We evaluated a maturity control panel of 383 Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs) selected from the soybean nested association mapping (SoyNAM) population. Dry matter ground measured along with canopy coverage (CC) from UAS imagery were collected in three environments. Light interception was modeled through a logistic curve using CC as a proxy. The total above-ground biomass collected during the growing season and its respective cumulative light intercepted were used to derive RUE through linear models fitting. Additive-genetic correlations, genome-wide association (GWA) and whole-genome regressions (WGR) were performed to evaluate the relationship between traits, their association with genomic regions, and the feasibility of predicting these efficiencies with genomic information. Correlation analyses considered three groups: the entire data set, and the high- and low-yielding RILs to determine association as a function of the GY. Our results revealed moderate to high phenotypic variation for Ei, RUE, and HI with ranges of 8.5%, 1.1 g MJ
−1
, and 0.2, respectively. Additive-genetic correlation revealed a strong relationship of GY with HI and moderate with RUE and Ei when whole data set was considered, but negligible contribution of HI on GY when just the top 100 was analyzed. The GWA analyses showed that Ei is associated with three SNPs; two of them located on chromosome 7 and one on chromosome 11 with no previous quantitative trait loci (QTLs) reported for these regions. RUE is associated with four SNPs on chromosomes 1, 7, 11, and 18. Some of these QTLs are novel, while others are previously documented for plant architecture and chlorophyll content. Two SNPs positioned on chromosome 13 and 15 with previous QTLs reported for plant height and seed set, weight and abortion were associated with HI. WGR showed high predictive ability for Ei, RUE, and HI with maximum correlation ranging between 0.75 and 0.80. Future improvements in GY can be expected through strategies prioritizing Ei for short-term results when using high yielding germplasm and RUE for medium- and long-term outcomes. This work is a pioneer attempt to integrate traditional physiological traits into the breeding process in the context of physiological breeding.