The Democratic Utility of Trust: A Cross-National Analysis
Studies of political culture have long emphasized the importance of generalized trust for effective democratic governance. Individual-level models continue to treat generalized trust as a crucial predictor of more democratic political cultures, leading some scholars to suggest that building generali...
Saved in:
| Published in: | The Journal of politics Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 45 - 59 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York, USA
Cambridge University Press
01-01-2010
University of Chicago Press |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Studies of political culture have long emphasized the importance of generalized trust for effective democratic governance. Individual-level models continue to treat generalized trust as a crucial predictor of more democratic political cultures, leading some scholars to suggest that building generalized trust is an important means of developing democratic prerequisites, like the appreciation of democratic values, in the nondemocratic world. In this paper we refute this conventional wisdom, arguing that the democratic utility of trust varies cross-nationally depending on existing levels of democracy within a country. Seldom have existing studies looked at the ways in which levels of generalized trust relate to microlevel indicators of support for democracy while controlling for overall institutional contexts. We argue existing government institutions play an important role in promoting levels of generalized trust because, in democracies and nondemocracies alike, political confidence in existing political institutions is linked to higher levels of generalized trust. The democratic utility of trust therefore is not consistent across the globe. The degree of democracy determines the extent to which generalized trust becomes meaningfully linked to support for democracy. We offer evidence from a multilevel model using World Values Survey data to support these claims. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Studies of political culture have long emphasized the importance of generalized trust for effective democratic governance. Individual-level models continue to treat generalized trust as a crucial predictor of more democratic political cultures, leading some scholars to suggest that building generalized trust is an important means of developing democratic prerequisites, like the appreciation of democratic values, in the nondemocratic world. In this paper we refute this conventional wisdom, arguing that the democratic utility of trust varies cross-nationally depending on existing levels of democracy within a country. Seldom have existing studies looked at the ways in which levels of generalized trust relate to microlevel indicators of support for democracy while controlling for overall institutional contexts. We argue existing government institutions play an important role in promoting levels of generalized trust because, in democracies and nondemocracies alike, political confidence in existing political institutions is linked to higher levels of generalized trust. The democratic utility of trust therefore is not consistent across the globe. The degree of democracy determines the extent to which generalized trust becomes meaningfully linked to support for democracy. We offer evidence from a multilevel model using World Values Survey data to support these claims. Studies of political culture have long emphasized the importance of generalized trust for effective democratic governance. Individual-level models continue to treat generalized trust as a crucial predictor of more democratic political cultures, leading some scholars to suggest that building generalized trust is an important means of developing democratic prerequisites, like the appreciation of democratic values, in the nondemocratic world. In this paper we refute this conventional wisdom, arguing that the democratic utility of trust varies cross-nationally depending on existing levels of democracy within a country. Seldom have existing studies looked at the ways in which levels of generalized trust relate to microlevel indicators of support for democracy while controlling for overall institutional contexts. We argue existing government institutions play an important role in promoting levels of generalized trust because, in democracies and nondemocracies alike, political confidence in existing political institutions is linked to higher levels of generalized trust. The democratic utility of trust therefore is not consistent across the globe. The degree of democracy determines the extent to which generalized trust becomes meaningfully linked to support for democracy. We offer evidence from a multilevel model using World Values Survey data to support these claims. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Studies of political culture have long emphasized the importance of generalized trust for effective democratic governance. Individual-level models continue to treat generalized trust as a crucial predictor of more democratic political cultures, leading some scholars to suggest that building generalized trust is an important means of developing democratic prerequisites, like the appreciation of democratic values, in the nondemocratic world. In this paper we refute this conventional wisdom, arguing that the democratic utility of trust varies cross-nationally depending on existing levels of democracy within a country. Seldom have existing studies looked at the ways in which levels of generalized trust relate to microlevel indicators of support for democracy while controlling for overall institutional contexts. We argue existing government institutions play an important role in promoting levels of generalized trust because, in democracies and nondemocracies alike, political confidence in existing political institutions is linked to higher levels of generalized trust. The democratic utility of trust therefore is not consistent across the globe. The degree of democracy determines the extent to which generalized trust becomes meaningfully linked to support for democracy. We offer evidence from a multilevel model using World Values Survey data to support these claims. Adapted from the source document. Studies of political culture have long emphasized the importance of generalized trust for effective democratic governance. Individual-level models continue to treat generalized trust as a crucial predictor of more democratic political cultures, leading some scholars to suggest that building generalized trust is an important means of developing democratic prerequisites, like the appreciation of democratic values, in the nondemocratic world. In this paper we refute this conventional wisdom, arguing that the democratic utility of trust varies cross-nationally depending on existing levels of democracy within a country. Seldom have existing studies looked at the ways in which levels of generalized trust relate to microlevel indicators of support for democracy while controlling for overall institutional contexts. We argue existing government institutions play an important role in promoting levels of generalized trust because, in democracies and nondemocracies alike, political confidence in existing political institutions is linked to higher levels of generalized trust. The democratic utility of trust therefore is not consistent across the globe. The degree of democracy determines the extent to which generalized trust becomes meaningfully linked to support for democracy. We offer evidence from a multilevel model using World Values Survey data to support these claims. Reprinted by permission of Cambridge University Press. An electronic version of this article can be accessed via the internet at http://journals.cambridge.org Studies of political culture have long emphasized the importance of generalized trust for effective democratic governance. Individual-level models continue to treat generalized trust as a crucial predictor of more democratic political cultures, leading some scholars to suggest that building generalized trust is an important means of developing democratic prerequisites, like the appreciation of democratic values, in the nondemocratic world. In this paper we refute this conventional wisdom, arguing that thedemocratic utilityof trust varies cross-nationally depending on existing levels of democracy within a country. Seldom have existing studies looked at the ways in which levels of generalized trust relate to microlevel indicators of support for democracy while controlling for overall institutional contexts. We argue existing government institutions play an important role in promoting levels of generalized trust because, in democracies and nondemocracies alike, political confidence in existing political institutions is linked to higher levels of generalized trust. Thedemocratic utilityof trust therefore is not consistent across the globe. The degree of democracy determines the extent to which generalized trust becomes meaningfully linked to support for democracy. We offer evidence from a multilevel model using World Values Survey data to support these claims. |
| Author | Jamal, Amaney Nooruddin, Irfan |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Amaney surname: Jamal fullname: Jamal, Amaney – sequence: 2 givenname: Irfan surname: Nooruddin fullname: Nooruddin, Irfan |
| BookMark | eNp9kDtvwjAUha2KSgXaH9ChUtShnVKuE8cPNkSfEmqHwhwZx4GgBFM7Gfj3dRRUpL482MP9zvE5d4B6W7PVCF1iuMOA2egdIIpijikIIYBQeoL6mFAeRgnwHuq347Cdn6GBcxvwhwrSR-P5Wgf3ujLKyrpQwaIuyqLeByYP5rZx9TiYBFNrnAtf_dxsZRlM_LV3hTtHp7ksnb44vEO0eHyYT5_D2dvTy3QyCxUhuA4Jy0FGSaREImNYqoxoIIpqpjNG-ZIJlfBc4UxAzLBiMVCZR4kS2qux4BAP0W3nu7Pmo9GuTqvCKV2WcqtN41JGYt7WI568-ZekkIDAnHnw-hu4MY31vVzKKReYENJCuINU29_qPN3ZopJ2n2JI26WnP5buNaNO06h1oeTK7Kx27uj-m-KqU2xcbezXFxFQD4o2RXxIIaulLbKVPrr9neMTrK6bGA |
| CODEN | JPOLA3 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_14683857_2022_2044670 crossref_primary_10_4236_aasoci_2012_24033 crossref_primary_10_1002_berj_3501 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0007123420000356 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4102336 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_9248_2011_00909_x crossref_primary_10_1177_0010414015574877 crossref_primary_10_1080_01900692_2015_1068329 crossref_primary_10_1093_publius_pjv039 crossref_primary_10_1177_0020715220909881 crossref_primary_10_1002_rev3_3239 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022381613001229 crossref_primary_10_1177_00104140231152784 crossref_primary_10_1177_14789299221130901 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5965_2012_02263_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chieco_2023_102048 crossref_primary_10_1177_1065912915580627 crossref_primary_10_1177_0731121421990045 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11558_018_9339_y crossref_primary_10_1080_09668136_2022_2033167 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022381611001691 crossref_primary_10_1080_23745118_2024_2364598 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12134_017_0517_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soscij_2016_02_008 crossref_primary_10_4236_sm_2012_23036 crossref_primary_10_1177_0010414011434294 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0043887115000441 crossref_primary_10_1111_1467_9248_12088 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12140_012_9176_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5906_2012_01677_x crossref_primary_10_1177_00323217231224971 crossref_primary_10_1002_app5_317 crossref_primary_10_1017_jea_2016_1 crossref_primary_10_1126_science_aaa0880 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41269_018_0092_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_00346764_2019_1640385 crossref_primary_10_1080_13510347_2022_2127146 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12134_016_0474_0 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0260210514000230 crossref_primary_10_1177_0010414017695335 crossref_primary_10_1080_13510347_2014_940041 crossref_primary_10_1111_ssqu_12231 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11115_012_0189_4 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0007123419000620 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11205_010_9704_6 crossref_primary_10_1017_psrm_2013_24 |
| Cites_doi | 10.2307/2786954 10.2307/3088424 10.1093/pan/mpi028 10.2307/2586304 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00187.x 10.1515/9780691186849 10.7208/chicago/9780226924564.001.0001 10.1093/pan/mpi029 10.2307/2944800 10.1177/1532673X03031004001 10.1177/106591290405700314 10.1017/S0022381600053512 10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7 10.1017/CBO9780511614934 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475 10.1017/CBO9780511614712 10.1177/0010414005278419 10.1515/9781400830503 10.1093/pan/mpi026 10.2307/2111684 10.1086/233695 10.4135/9781849209366 10.1177/0192512101222004 10.1002/ncr.91203 10.1177/0032329296024001005 10.1353/wp.2006.0022 10.2307/4150160 10.1017/CBO9781139172493 10.2307/4146954 10.1093/pan/mpi023 10.1080/03906700500038579 10.2307/2657288 10.1093/pan/mpi030 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © Southern Political Science Association 2010 Copyright Cambridge University Press Jan 2010 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © Southern Political Science Association 2010 – notice: Copyright Cambridge University Press Jan 2010 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7UB 8BJ FQK JBE |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0022381609990466 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Worldwide Political Science Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitleList | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Worldwide Political Science Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Political Science |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Amaney Jamal and Irfan Nooruddin Democratic Utility of Trust |
| EISSN | 1468-2508 |
| EndPage | 59 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 2360144541 10_1017_S0022381609990466 S0022381609990466 10.1017/s0022381609990466 |
| Genre | Feature |
| GroupedDBID | -1C -1D -1E -2P -2R -E. -ET -~X .FH 0E1 0R~ 123 1OC 1OL 29L 2AX 2FS 2KS 31~ 4.4 5.N 5GY 5VS 6~7 6~8 74X 74Z 7~U 7~V 8-1 85S 8I0 8VB AAXPP ABABT ABBHK ABDBF ABITZ ABIVO ABJNI ABMYL ABPEO ABPFR ABPPZ ABTAH ABTME ABXSQ ABYAD ACGFS ACHQT ACIMK ACKOT ACMRT ACNCT ACTWD ACUBG ACXQS ADACV ADALM ADIYS ADMHC ADTZG ADULT AEGXH AEMOZ AEMTW AEUPB AFDAS AFEBI AFFNX AFUTZ AFXHP AFZJQ AGHSJ AIDAL AIHXQ AJ7 AJAOE AKVCP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARABE AZFZN B-7 BFHJK BKOMP C0O CAG CO8 COF CS3 DC4 DCZOG DGPHC DU5 EAD EAP EAS EAU EBA EBO EBR EBS EBU ED0 EJD EMK ESO ESX EWH EZTEY F20 F5P FVMVE HF~ HG- HGD HSS HST HVGLF HZ~ H~9 I.5 I.7 I.8 IHE I~P J36 J38 J3B JAAYA JAS JBMMH JBZCM JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLXEF JPL JSODD JST K1G KC5 LH4 LW6 LW7 M-V M7~ M8. MVM NHB O9- OMK P2P PQQKQ QWB RCP RIG ROL RR0 RXW S6- SA0 TAE TH9 TKY TN5 UBW UBZ UFCQG UKR VQA WH7 WHG WQ3 WXS WXU WXY WYP XIH XSW YQT YXE YZZ ZA5 ZCA ZCG ZL0 ZUP ZY4 ~45 ABGJC 08R ABPTK AIAFM B4K PQEST UMP AANKH AAYXX ABPQH ADMHG CITATION EBTJD IPSME 7UB 8BJ FQK JBE |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-47f0a252c95a30bcd4e04c6e7ed768b79c58fc1d90371c7306af25c9e44119803 |
| IEDL.DBID | JAS |
| ISSN | 0022-3816 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 24 23:47:50 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 22:45:53 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 17:43:59 EDT 2024 Fri Nov 22 00:52:49 EST 2024 Tue Apr 25 18:48:27 EDT 2023 Fri Feb 02 07:03:46 EST 2024 Wed Mar 13 05:53:02 EDT 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c441t-47f0a252c95a30bcd4e04c6e7ed768b79c58fc1d90371c7306af25c9e44119803 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
| PQID | 868914447 |
| PQPubID | 41171 |
| PageCount | 15 |
| ParticipantIDs | cambridge_journals_10_1017_S0022381609990466 proquest_miscellaneous_60509187 proquest_journals_868914447 uchicagopress_journals_S0022381609990466 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0022381609990466 jstor_primary_20622397 proquest_miscellaneous_743800224 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20100100 2010-01-00 20100101 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-01-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2010 text: 20100100 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | New York, USA |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, USA – name: Chicago |
| PublicationTitle | The Journal of politics |
| PublicationYear | 2010 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press University of Chicago Press |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Cambridge University Press – name: University of Chicago Press |
| References | ref13 Baker Wayne (ref2) ref53 ref52 ref10 Almond (ref1) 1963 ref17 ref18 Gamson William (ref9) Offe Claus (ref36) Norris Pippa (ref35) Rose Richard (ref41) Hardin Russel (ref11) Pharr Susan (ref37) 2000 ref51 ref50 Cleary Matthew (ref5) ref45 Jamal Amaney (ref20) ref48 ref42 ref44 Inglehart Ronald F (ref15) ref43 Norris Pippa (ref34) Knight Jack (ref24) Putnam Robert (ref38) Kreft Ita (ref25) ref4 ref3 ref6 Raudenbush Stephen (ref40) 2002 Fukuyama Francis (ref7) 1995 Hart Vivien (ref12) Inglehart Ronald F (ref16) ref31 ref30 ref33 ref32 Uslaner Eric (ref49) ref26 Przeworski Adam (ref39) ref22 ref21 Fukuyama Francis (ref8) Inglehart Ronald F (ref19) 2005 ref28 Stenner Karen (ref46) Huntington Samuel (ref14) ref27 ref29 Sztompka Piotr (ref47) 1999 |
| References_xml | – volume-title: Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. year: 1995 ident: ref7 contributor: fullname: Fukuyama Francis – volume-title: 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance ident: ref34 contributor: fullname: Norris Pippa – ident: ref43 doi: 10.2307/2786954 – volume-title: How Can We Trust Our Fellow Citizens? In Democracy and Trust, ed. Mark Warren ident: ref36 contributor: fullname: Offe Claus – ident: ref45 doi: 10.2307/3088424 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi028 – volume-title: Distrust and Democracy: Political Distrust in Britain and America ident: ref12 contributor: fullname: Hart Vivien – volume-title: Trust: A Sociological Theory year: 1999 ident: ref47 contributor: fullname: Sztompka Piotr – ident: ref13 doi: 10.2307/2586304 – volume-title: Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies ident: ref16 contributor: fullname: Inglehart Ronald F – ident: ref52 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00187.x – volume-title: Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. year: 2000 ident: ref37 doi: 10.1515/9780691186849 contributor: fullname: Pharr Susan – ident: ref48 doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226924564.001.0001 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi029 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.2307/2944800 – volume-title: Democracy and its Alternatives ident: ref41 contributor: fullname: Rose Richard – ident: ref50 doi: 10.1177/1532673X03031004001 – volume-title: Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society ident: ref15 contributor: fullname: Inglehart Ronald F – ident: ref51 doi: 10.1177/106591290405700314 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1017/S0022381600053512 – volume-title: Making Democracy Work ident: ref38 doi: 10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7 contributor: fullname: Putnam Robert – volume-title: Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors]. year: 2005 ident: ref19 contributor: fullname: Inglehart Ronald F – volume-title: The Moral Foundations of Trust ident: ref49 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614934 contributor: fullname: Uslaner Eric – volume-title: Culture Matters ident: ref8 contributor: fullname: Fukuyama Francis – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475 – volume-title: Sacred and Secular-rational: Religion and Politics Worldwide ident: ref35 contributor: fullname: Norris Pippa – volume-title: Gabriel and Sidney Verba year: 1963 ident: ref1 contributor: fullname: Almond – volume-title: Trust in Society K. Cook. ident: ref11 contributor: fullname: Hardin Russel – volume-title: The Authoritarian Dynamic ident: ref46 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614712 contributor: fullname: Stenner Karen – volume-title: Trust in Society, ed. K. Cook. ident: ref24 contributor: fullname: Knight Jack – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1177/0010414005278419 – volume-title: Barriers to Democracy: The Other Side of Social Capital in Palestine and the Arab World ident: ref20 doi: 10.1515/9781400830503 contributor: fullname: Jamal Amaney – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi026 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.2307/2111684 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1086/233695 – volume-title: Power and Discontent ident: ref9 contributor: fullname: Gamson William – volume-title: Bryk year: 2002 ident: ref40 contributor: fullname: Raudenbush Stephen – volume-title: Introducing Multilevel Modeling ident: ref25 doi: 10.4135/9781849209366 contributor: fullname: Kreft Ita – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1177/0192512101222004 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1002/ncr.91203 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1177/0032329296024001005 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1353/wp.2006.0022 – volume-title: Democracy and the Culture of Skepticism: Political Trust in Argentina and Mexico ident: ref5 contributor: fullname: Cleary Matthew – ident: ref18 doi: 10.2307/4150160 – volume-title: Democracy and the Market ident: ref39 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139172493 contributor: fullname: Przeworski Adam – ident: ref44 doi: 10.2307/4146954 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi023 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.1080/03906700500038579 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.2307/2657288 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi030 – volume-title: Unpublished Manuscript ident: ref2 contributor: fullname: Baker Wayne – volume-title: The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order ident: ref14 contributor: fullname: Huntington Samuel |
| SSID | ssj0000694 |
| Score | 2.2346048 |
| Snippet | Studies of political culture have long emphasized the importance of generalized trust for effective democratic governance. Individual-level models continue to... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref uchicagopress jstor cambridge |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 45 |
| SubjectTerms | Authoritarianism Cross-national analysis Cultural groups Democracy Democratization Governance Maximum likelihood estimation Political behavior Political Culture Political institutions Religiosity Social capital Statistical significance Trust Utility theory Values |
| Title | The Democratic Utility of Trust: A Cross-National Analysis |
| URI | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022381609990466/type/journal_article https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1017/s0022381609990466 https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1017/S0022381609990466 https://www.proquest.com/docview/868914447 https://search.proquest.com/docview/60509187 https://search.proquest.com/docview/743800224 |
| Volume | 72 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV07T8MwED7RTixQHhWlPDwwIEQk5-VHt6oPdWKhldiixHEmSBBtB_4958RJW6oyoGzxxXHsO9938fkzwINPRSrxcngQCieQGKDElKFdhakMFc-08s3e4dkrf3kT44mhyWH1XhiTVlnmBZar-AiQkndtg8yS-dMzLoYZWIOBHWtBS7iWFndr_pVBwxGOwvVaZkkU_auCbUaFHc9UJSfuwM7d00m2vND09L_t78CJxZ1kWCnKGRzp_Bw6NvsNC6yNX8AAFYeM9UehjG4osliZ7NlvUmRkbvZnDMiQjMwHOJZSGyu1xCaXsJhO5qOZYw9YcBSioJUT8IzGXugpGcY-TVQaaBooprlOMQpJuFShyJSbSsPrp3AuYHHmhUpqfNqVgvpdaOdFrq-A-FpwvCMRzaFfjGlCM4RefoJoUQidJD14bjo6smayjKoUMx7tjUsPnuqxiD4r2o2_hLtllzeSHmUoIXkP-vXwbd4pmJAYRQZYet-Uok2ZhZI418V6GTFDiuMKlCAHJLgh6jfwpwePO2qxec9eM68PNbMPx1VOgvmxcwPt1dda30Jrma7vSs3-AaCd7kI |
| link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,817,27933,27934 |
| linkProvider | JSTOR |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Democratic+Utility+of+Trust%3A+A+Cross-National+Analysis&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+politics&rft.au=Jamal%2C+Amaney&rft.au=Nooruddin%2C+Irfan&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.pub=Cambridge+University+Press&rft.issn=0022-3816&rft.eissn=1468-2508&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=59&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2FS0022381609990466&rft.externalDocID=10_1017_S0022381609990466 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3816&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3816&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3816&client=summon |