Robotic single-site cholecystectomy
Background Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 18 - 25 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Japan
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-01-2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Background
Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some of the technical challenges of manual single incision laparoscopy.
Methods
From February 2011 to February 2013, all consecutive robotic single site cholecystectomies (RSSC) were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Demographic, intra‐ and postoperative data of all patients that underwent RSSC at our institution were analyzed. Data were evaluated for the overall patient cohort as well as after stratification according to patient BMI (body mass index) and surgeon's experience.
Results
During the study period, 82 patients underwent robotic single site cholecystectomy at our institution. The dominating preoperative diagnosis was cholelithiasis. Mean overall operative time was 91 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.4% of cases. One conversion to open surgery due to the intraoperative finding of a gallbladder carcinoma was observed and two patients needed an additional laparoscopic trocar. The rate of postoperative complications was 4.9% with a mean length of stay of 2.4 days. No significant differences were observed when comparing results between robotic novices and robotic experts. Patients with higher BMI trended towards longer surgical console and overall operative time, but resulted in similar rates of conversions and complications when compared to normal weight patients.
Conclusions
Robotic Single‐Site cholecystectomy can be performed safely and effectively with low rates of complications and conversions in patients with differing BMI and by surgeons with varying levels of experience. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background
Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some of the technical challenges of manual single incision laparoscopy.
Methods
From February 2011 to February 2013, all consecutive robotic single site cholecystectomies (RSSC) were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Demographic, intra‐ and postoperative data of all patients that underwent RSSC at our institution were analyzed. Data were evaluated for the overall patient cohort as well as after stratification according to patient BMI (body mass index) and surgeon's experience.
Results
During the study period, 82 patients underwent robotic single site cholecystectomy at our institution. The dominating preoperative diagnosis was cholelithiasis. Mean overall operative time was 91 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.4% of cases. One conversion to open surgery due to the intraoperative finding of a gallbladder carcinoma was observed and two patients needed an additional laparoscopic trocar. The rate of postoperative complications was 4.9% with a mean length of stay of 2.4 days. No significant differences were observed when comparing results between robotic novices and robotic experts. Patients with higher BMI trended towards longer surgical console and overall operative time, but resulted in similar rates of conversions and complications when compared to normal weight patients.
Conclusions
Robotic Single‐Site cholecystectomy can be performed safely and effectively with low rates of complications and conversions in patients with differing BMI and by surgeons with varying levels of experience. Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some of the technical challenges of manual single incision laparoscopy. From February 2011 to February 2013, all consecutive robotic single site cholecystectomies (RSSC) were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Demographic, intra- and postoperative data of all patients that underwent RSSC at our institution were analyzed. Data were evaluated for the overall patient cohort as well as after stratification according to patient BMI (body mass index) and surgeon's experience. During the study period, 82 patients underwent robotic single site cholecystectomy at our institution. The dominating preoperative diagnosis was cholelithiasis. Mean overall operative time was 91 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.4% of cases. One conversion to open surgery due to the intraoperative finding of a gallbladder carcinoma was observed and two patients needed an additional laparoscopic trocar. The rate of postoperative complications was 4.9% with a mean length of stay of 2.4 days. No significant differences were observed when comparing results between robotic novices and robotic experts. Patients with higher BMI trended towards longer surgical console and overall operative time, but resulted in similar rates of conversions and complications when compared to normal weight patients. Robotic Single-Site cholecystectomy can be performed safely and effectively with low rates of complications and conversions in patients with differing BMI and by surgeons with varying levels of experience. BACKGROUNDMinimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some of the technical challenges of manual single incision laparoscopy.METHODSFrom February 2011 to February 2013, all consecutive robotic single site cholecystectomies (RSSC) were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Demographic, intra- and postoperative data of all patients that underwent RSSC at our institution were analyzed. Data were evaluated for the overall patient cohort as well as after stratification according to patient BMI (body mass index) and surgeon's experience.RESULTSDuring the study period, 82 patients underwent robotic single site cholecystectomy at our institution. The dominating preoperative diagnosis was cholelithiasis. Mean overall operative time was 91 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.4% of cases. One conversion to open surgery due to the intraoperative finding of a gallbladder carcinoma was observed and two patients needed an additional laparoscopic trocar. The rate of postoperative complications was 4.9% with a mean length of stay of 2.4 days. No significant differences were observed when comparing results between robotic novices and robotic experts. Patients with higher BMI trended towards longer surgical console and overall operative time, but resulted in similar rates of conversions and complications when compared to normal weight patients.CONCLUSIONSRobotic Single-Site cholecystectomy can be performed safely and effectively with low rates of complications and conversions in patients with differing BMI and by surgeons with varying levels of experience. Background Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some of the technical challenges of manual single incision laparoscopy. Methods From February 2011 to February 2013, all consecutive robotic single site cholecystectomies (RSSC) were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Demographic, intra- and postoperative data of all patients that underwent RSSC at our institution were analyzed. Data were evaluated for the overall patient cohort as well as after stratification according to patient BMI (body mass index) and surgeon's experience. Results During the study period, 82 patients underwent robotic single site cholecystectomy at our institution. The dominating preoperative diagnosis was cholelithiasis. Mean overall operative time was 91min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.4% of cases. One conversion to open surgery due to the intraoperative finding of a gallbladder carcinoma was observed and two patients needed an additional laparoscopic trocar. The rate of postoperative complications was 4.9% with a mean length of stay of 2.4 days. No significant differences were observed when comparing results between robotic novices and robotic experts. Patients with higher BMI trended towards longer surgical console and overall operative time, but resulted in similar rates of conversions and complications when compared to normal weight patients. Conclusions Robotic Single-Site cholecystectomy can be performed safely and effectively with low rates of complications and conversions in patients with differing BMI and by surgeons with varying levels of experience. |
Author | Hagen, Monika E. Jung, Minoa Morel, Philippe Buchs, Nicolas C. Volonte, Francesco Iranmanesh, Pouya Pugin, François Buehler, Leo Azagury, Dan E. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Philippe surname: Morel fullname: Morel, Philippe organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland – sequence: 2 givenname: Nicolas C. surname: Buchs fullname: Buchs, Nicolas C. organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland – sequence: 3 givenname: Pouya surname: Iranmanesh fullname: Iranmanesh, Pouya organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland – sequence: 4 givenname: François surname: Pugin fullname: Pugin, François organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland – sequence: 5 givenname: Leo surname: Buehler fullname: Buehler, Leo organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland – sequence: 6 givenname: Dan E. surname: Azagury fullname: Azagury, Dan E. organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland – sequence: 7 givenname: Minoa surname: Jung fullname: Jung, Minoa organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland – sequence: 8 givenname: Francesco surname: Volonte fullname: Volonte, Francesco organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland – sequence: 9 givenname: Monika E. surname: Hagen fullname: Hagen, Monika E. email: monika.hagen@hcuge.ch organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24142898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp10FtLwzAYBuAgE6dz-A9ksAsF6cxpOVzqcJsyVIaHy9Cmqevsmtm0aP-9mZ27EAx85Lt4ePl4j0Art7kB4ATBAYIQXy4X0XpA2B44RIKJgEmBW7ud0zboOreE_hFEJIEHoI0polhIcQj6cxvZMtU9l-ZvmQlcWpqeXtjM6NqVRpd2VR-D_STMnOlu_w54Ht88jabB7GFyO7qaBZpSyII4JiiJiIw4lz4cQywjyaCJIRJcUAMpHrKYSMm1STQaah5BhqTQMkwYRyHpgPMmd13Yj8q4Uq1Sp02WhbmxlVOISsgplYh62v9Dl7Yqcn-dQhwyCf0Ir84apQvrXGEStS7SVVjUCkG1qU5tqlOEeXm6zauilYl37rcoDy4a8Jlmpv4vR91Nrx9_4oJGp77Dr50Oi3fFOOFD9Xo_UWhCx3yOx-qFfAOPPYUF |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_1856 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10029_017_1621_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_019_05049_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06693_2 crossref_primary_10_18528_ijgii180048 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_018_6300_3 crossref_primary_10_1097_FS9_0000000000000099 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_016_0662_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4658_z crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_23931 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4428_y crossref_primary_10_7602_jmis_2017_20_1_16 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4583_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_016_0223_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2015_03_052 crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2023_2293917 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_017_5939_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_016_0249_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_014_3916_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_1789 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_017_5843_z crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v22_i2_736 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2022_0312 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_07229_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2016_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40137_016_0142_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijscr_2014_10_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_015_3135_0 crossref_primary_10_7602_jmis_2017_20_1_3 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s11605-011-1688-2 10.1007/s00464-011-2087-1 10.1001/archsurg.2012.508 10.1007/s00464-007-9683-0 10.1002/rcs.1445 10.1007/s00464-012-2227-2 10.1007/s11605-009-1079-0 10.1007/s11701-011-0310-7 10.1159/000114196 10.1002/bjs.7126 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0 10.1001/archsurg.2011.143 10.1002/bjs.8937 10.1007/s00464-011-1759-1 10.1089/lap.2011.0047 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery – notice: 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. – notice: 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery |
DBID | BSCLL CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION K9. 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1002/jhbp.36 |
DatabaseName | Istex Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1868-6982 |
EndPage | 25 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3787491261 10_1002_jhbp_36 24142898 JHBP36 ark_67375_WNG_1G4F7R2F_V |
Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Intuitive Surgical Inc |
GroupedDBID | --- -5E -5G -BR -Y2 0R~ 0VY 1OC 2JY 2~H 30V 33P 3SF 4.4 52U 52V 53G 5VS 8-1 8TC 8UJ 95. AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAIAL AANLZ AANXM AAONW AARHV AARTL AASGY AAXRX AAYZH AAZKR ABCUV ABJNI ABJOX ABQWH ABTEG ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACBXY ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACOMO ACPOU ACREN ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADINQ ADIZJ ADKPE ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADQRH ADRFC ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGNC AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUYR AFBBN AFBPY AFEXP AFFPM AFGKR AFLOW AFPWT AFWTZ AGJBK AHBTC AHBYD AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMKLP AMTXH AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BGNMA BHBCM BMXJE BRXPI BSCLL C45 CSCUP DCZOG DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD EMOBN EN4 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S GODZA GQ6 GQ8 H.X HF~ HGLYW HMJXF HVGLF HZ~ IZIGR JBSCW KBYEO LATKE LEEKS LITHE LOXES LUTES LYRES M4Y MA- MEWTI MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM MY~ N2Q NF~ NU0 O66 O9- O93 O9I OVD P2W P9S PQQKQ Q.N QB0 QOS R89 ROL RSV S37 S3B SDE SMD SOJ SUPJJ SV3 SZN TEORI TSV TUC VC2 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WK8 WOHZO WVDHM WXSBR Z45 Z7U Z82 Z87 Z8V ~EX CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAMNL AAYXX CITATION K9. 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4406-dd31fb39b7792892029b960ed018784e04256d3997cefc15c7b06198c9af671a3 |
IEDL.DBID | 33P |
ISSN | 1868-6974 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 08:46:44 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 16:54:07 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 21 22:39:16 EST 2024 Tue Oct 15 23:47:02 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 01:00:08 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 30 09:52:05 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Cholecystectomy Docking Single incision Da Vinci Robotic Single site |
Language | English |
License | 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4406-dd31fb39b7792892029b960ed018784e04256d3997cefc15c7b06198c9af671a3 |
Notes | istex:78BCBB686A52230BC9FEF88C15619948A36DFC54 ark:/67375/WNG-1G4F7R2F-V ArticleID:JHBP36 Intuitive Surgical Inc ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/jhbp.36 |
PMID | 24142898 |
PQID | 1706900698 |
PQPubID | 2034613 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1490744914 proquest_journals_1706900698 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_36 pubmed_primary_24142898 wiley_primary_10_1002_jhbp_36_JHBP36 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_1G4F7R2F_V |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2014-01 January 2014 2014-Jan 2014-01-00 20140101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2014 text: 2014-01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Japan |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Japan – name: Tokyo |
PublicationTitle | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | Morel P, Pugin F, Bucher P, Buchs NC, Hagen ME. Robotic single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Robot Surg. 2012;6:273-274. Testini M, Piccinni G, Lissidini G, Di Venere B, Gurrado A, Poli E, et al. Management of descending duodenal injuries secondary to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg. 2008;25:12-15. Broeders IA. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2010;97:1007-1012). Br J Surg. 2010;97:1007-1012. Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, Chand B, Escobar P, Kaouk J, et al. First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3566-3573. Balaphas A, Hagen ME, Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonte F, Inan I, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopy single site surgery: a transdisciplinary review. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9:1-11. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. NIH Consens Statement. 1992;10:1-28. Wren SM, Curet MJ. Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg. 2011;146:1122-1127. Morel P, Hagen ME, Bucher P, Buchs NC, Pugin F. Robotic single-port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:2182-2186. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1205-1213. Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A, et al. Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg. 2012;147:709-714. Hagen ME, Meehan JJ, Inan I, Morel P. Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1505-1508. Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, Chrysocheris P, Georgiou M. Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site ® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2687-2694. Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, Guarino S, Santoro A, Parisi A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:191-208. Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginesta C, Espert JJ, Martinez A, Benarroch G, et al. Single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes from a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21:683-686. Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Thompson K, Jacobsen G, Spivack A, Wong B, et al. Supra-pubic single incision cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:404-407. Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, Chrysocheris P, Georgiou M. Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site((R)) robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2687-2694. Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, Lucido FS, Priora F, Bianchi PP, et al. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1648-1655. 2010; 97 2011; 146 2010; 14 2008; 25 2013; 100 2011; 21 2008; 22 2011; 15 2012; 26 2011; 25 2012; 6 2012; 147 1992; 10 2013; 9 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 (e_1_2_7_2_1) 1992; 10 |
References_xml | – volume: 6 start-page: 273 year: 2012 end-page: 274 article-title: Robotic single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy publication-title: J Robot Surg – volume: 146 start-page: 1122 year: 2011 end-page: 1127 article-title: Single‐port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single‐site surgical platform publication-title: Arch Surg – volume: 22 start-page: 1505 year: 2008 end-page: 1508 article-title: Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 14 start-page: 404 year: 2010 end-page: 407 article-title: Supra‐pubic single incision cholecystectomy publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg – volume: 26 start-page: 2687 year: 2012 end-page: 2694 article-title: Cholecystectomy using a novel Single‐Site ® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 147 start-page: 709 year: 2012 end-page: 714 article-title: Overcoming the challenges of single‐incision cholecystectomy with robotic single‐site technology publication-title: Arch Surg – volume: 26 start-page: 1648 year: 2012 end-page: 1655 article-title: Single‐site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 25 start-page: 12 year: 2008 end-page: 15 article-title: Management of descending duodenal injuries secondary to laparoscopic cholecystectomy publication-title: Dig Surg – volume: 97 start-page: 1007 year: 2010 end-page: 1012 article-title: Randomized clinical trial of single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2010;97:1007–1012) publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 1992 end-page: 28 article-title: Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy publication-title: NIH Consens Statement – volume: 100 start-page: 191 year: 2013 end-page: 208 article-title: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single‐incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 9 start-page: 1 year: 2013 end-page: 11 article-title: Robotic laparoendoscopy single site surgery: a transdisciplinary review publication-title: Int J Med Robot – volume: 26 start-page: 2687 year: 2012 end-page: 2694 article-title: Cholecystectomy using a novel Single‐Site((R)) robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 26 start-page: 1205 year: 2012 end-page: 1213 article-title: Single‐incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta‐analysis publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 25 start-page: 3566 year: 2011 end-page: 3573 article-title: First human surgery with a novel single‐port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single‐Site platform publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 21 start-page: 683 year: 2011 end-page: 686 article-title: Single‐incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes from a single institution publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A – volume: 15 start-page: 2182 year: 2011 end-page: 2186 article-title: Robotic single‐port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1688-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2087-1 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.508 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9683-0 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1002/rcs.1445 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2227-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.508 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1079-0 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0310-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1159/000114196 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2227-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1002/bjs.7126 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.143 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 1992 ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 article-title: Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy publication-title: NIH Consens Statement – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1002/bjs.8937 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1759-1 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0047 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1688-2 |
SSID | ssj0000313930 |
Score | 2.2673025 |
Snippet | Background
Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the... Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent... Background Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the... BACKGROUNDMinimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 18 |
SubjectTerms | Body Mass Index Cholecystectomy Cholecystectomy - methods Cholelithiasis - surgery Da Vinci Docking Female Humans Intraoperative Complications Length of Stay Male Middle Aged Operative Time Patients Postoperative Complications Robotic Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Robotics Single incision Single site Treatment Outcome |
Title | Robotic single-site cholecystectomy |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-1G4F7R2F-V/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjhbp.36 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24142898 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1706900698 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1490744914 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA4-Ll584Ku6SgX1VnbbpE1z9LW7eBDxfQvNC_GxFdcFvfkT_I3-EmfS3cqCguCp0GRoOsl0vpk03xCyrYVgLnYuElaYCDy-jXLNXOTSlOtWrqmwvnTCOT-5yQ-PkCanLvVV8UPUCTe0DP-9RgMvVL_5TRp6d6sgYkeybYgR_OENelpnV5CRUPhCI0gHH2WAmqsTsyjcHIqOuaJp1OrrTzhzHLZ6v9Oe-8eI58nsEGyGe9XqWCATtrdIds5KVcKNELMED_bz_QM3kEPtC-Uir7N-KR_flshl--jioBsNiyVEmoFTjoyhsVNUKM4FBFFJKxEKohNrsOpeziwaZ2YAjnBtnY5TzRW4cpFrUbiMxwVdJlO9smdXSQhO3DCepJbBNU4KhZjJthx1xqhY04CEI73Jp4oTQ1bsx4nEd5Q0C8iu12fdXjzf4y9kPJXXJx0Zd1ibnyVteRWQxkjhcmg9fYmUPgI5lPOAbNXNsO5xM6Po2XIAfRiG9UzELCAr1UTVDwNUAlEVSm_7-fhtlPK4u39Ks7W_dVsnM4CWWJV_aZCpl-eB3SCTfTPY9IvvC-Yj2tM |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,1408,27933,27934,46064,46488 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3JTuQwEC2xHODCgBggDEuQGG4RndiJY25sTcMwLcR-sxIvQiwdBLQENz6Bb-RLqEq6g5BAQuIUKbYVp1yVelWOXwEsaym5C50LpJUmQI9vg1RzF7g4FrqRaiZtWTrhSLTP061toslZ65-Fqfgh6oQbWUb5vSYDp4T06jtr6OVFjiF7MgjDPEE1pOMb7KDOrxAnoSxLjRAhfJAgbq7OzNLo1d7YD85omOT6-BnS_AhcS8_T_PWTOY_DWA9v-uuVgkzAgO1Mwt_DIi_whk-Jgmv7-vxCe8i-LmvlErWzfihunn7DSXP7eLMV9OolBJqjXw6MYaHLmcyFkBhHRY1I5higWEOF91JuyT4Tg4hEaOt0GGuRozeXqZaZS0SYsSkY6hQdOwM--nHDRRRbjtcwynKCTbbhmDMmDzXzwO8LTt1WtBiqIkCOFL2jYokHK6VA6_bs7or-IhOxOmvvqHCHN8Vh1FSnHsz1Ja56BnSviNVHEo1y6sFS3YyqT_sZWccWXezDKbLnMuQeTFcrVT8MgQkGVjR6uVyQr2ap9lobByyZ_V63RRhpHf_fV_u77X9_YBTBE6_SMXMw9HDXtfMweG-6C6UmvgHDGN77 |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1fT9swED8Blaa9jE2Mka1jQep4i6hjJ44fx9oA21RV3YC9WYn_CLGtqYBK7G0fYZ-RT7K7pA1CAmkST5Fin2KffbnfnZPfAfSMUsIz7yPllI3Q47soM8JHPkmk6WeGK1eXTvgqR9-zwZBoctpSXw0_RJtwI8uo39dk4DPr925JQ8_PSozY01XoCAThRJvP-bhNrxAloaorjRAffJQibG5-mSXpvYXsHV_UIbVe3wc07-LW2vHk648Y8nN4tkCb4Ydme7yAFTfdgPeTqqzwRkhpgp_u5s9fOkEOTV0pl4idzVX16_dLOM6H3z4eRotqCZER6JUjaznzJVellAqjqLgfqxLDE2ep7F4mHFlnahGPSOO8YYmRJfpylRlV-FSygm_C2rSaui0I0YtbIePECbyyuCgJNLm-597akhkeQLjUm541pBi6oT-ONc1R8zSA3VqfbXtx8YO-IZOJPh0daHYgcjmJc30SQHepcL0wn0tNnD6KSJSzAHbaZtz4dJpRTF01xz6C4nqhmAjgVbNQ7cMQlmBYRdK9ej0eGqX-dLg_5unr_-v2Dp6MB7n-cjT6_AaeInISTS6mC2tXF3P3FlYv7Xy73of_ACsv3aE |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic+single%E2%80%90site+cholecystectomy&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+hepato-biliary-pancreatic+sciences&rft.au=Morel%2C+Philippe&rft.au=Buchs%2C+Nicolas+C.&rft.au=Iranmanesh%2C+Pouya&rft.au=Pugin%2C+Fran%C3%A7ois&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.issn=1868-6974&rft.eissn=1868-6982&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=25&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjhbp.36&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fjhbp.36&rft.externalDocID=JHBP36 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon |