Robotic single-site cholecystectomy

Background Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 18 - 25
Main Authors: Morel, Philippe, Buchs, Nicolas C., Iranmanesh, Pouya, Pugin, François, Buehler, Leo, Azagury, Dan E., Jung, Minoa, Volonte, Francesco, Hagen, Monika E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Japan Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-01-2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Background Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some of the technical challenges of manual single incision laparoscopy. Methods From February 2011 to February 2013, all consecutive robotic single site cholecystectomies (RSSC) were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Demographic, intra‐ and postoperative data of all patients that underwent RSSC at our institution were analyzed. Data were evaluated for the overall patient cohort as well as after stratification according to patient BMI (body mass index) and surgeon's experience. Results During the study period, 82 patients underwent robotic single site cholecystectomy at our institution. The dominating preoperative diagnosis was cholelithiasis. Mean overall operative time was 91 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.4% of cases. One conversion to open surgery due to the intraoperative finding of a gallbladder carcinoma was observed and two patients needed an additional laparoscopic trocar. The rate of postoperative complications was 4.9% with a mean length of stay of 2.4 days. No significant differences were observed when comparing results between robotic novices and robotic experts. Patients with higher BMI trended towards longer surgical console and overall operative time, but resulted in similar rates of conversions and complications when compared to normal weight patients. Conclusions Robotic Single‐Site cholecystectomy can be performed safely and effectively with low rates of complications and conversions in patients with differing BMI and by surgeons with varying levels of experience.
AbstractList Background Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some of the technical challenges of manual single incision laparoscopy. Methods From February 2011 to February 2013, all consecutive robotic single site cholecystectomies (RSSC) were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Demographic, intra‐ and postoperative data of all patients that underwent RSSC at our institution were analyzed. Data were evaluated for the overall patient cohort as well as after stratification according to patient BMI (body mass index) and surgeon's experience. Results During the study period, 82 patients underwent robotic single site cholecystectomy at our institution. The dominating preoperative diagnosis was cholelithiasis. Mean overall operative time was 91 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.4% of cases. One conversion to open surgery due to the intraoperative finding of a gallbladder carcinoma was observed and two patients needed an additional laparoscopic trocar. The rate of postoperative complications was 4.9% with a mean length of stay of 2.4 days. No significant differences were observed when comparing results between robotic novices and robotic experts. Patients with higher BMI trended towards longer surgical console and overall operative time, but resulted in similar rates of conversions and complications when compared to normal weight patients. Conclusions Robotic Single‐Site cholecystectomy can be performed safely and effectively with low rates of complications and conversions in patients with differing BMI and by surgeons with varying levels of experience.
Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some of the technical challenges of manual single incision laparoscopy. From February 2011 to February 2013, all consecutive robotic single site cholecystectomies (RSSC) were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Demographic, intra- and postoperative data of all patients that underwent RSSC at our institution were analyzed. Data were evaluated for the overall patient cohort as well as after stratification according to patient BMI (body mass index) and surgeon's experience. During the study period, 82 patients underwent robotic single site cholecystectomy at our institution. The dominating preoperative diagnosis was cholelithiasis. Mean overall operative time was 91 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.4% of cases. One conversion to open surgery due to the intraoperative finding of a gallbladder carcinoma was observed and two patients needed an additional laparoscopic trocar. The rate of postoperative complications was 4.9% with a mean length of stay of 2.4 days. No significant differences were observed when comparing results between robotic novices and robotic experts. Patients with higher BMI trended towards longer surgical console and overall operative time, but resulted in similar rates of conversions and complications when compared to normal weight patients. Robotic Single-Site cholecystectomy can be performed safely and effectively with low rates of complications and conversions in patients with differing BMI and by surgeons with varying levels of experience.
BACKGROUNDMinimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some of the technical challenges of manual single incision laparoscopy.METHODSFrom February 2011 to February 2013, all consecutive robotic single site cholecystectomies (RSSC) were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Demographic, intra- and postoperative data of all patients that underwent RSSC at our institution were analyzed. Data were evaluated for the overall patient cohort as well as after stratification according to patient BMI (body mass index) and surgeon's experience.RESULTSDuring the study period, 82 patients underwent robotic single site cholecystectomy at our institution. The dominating preoperative diagnosis was cholelithiasis. Mean overall operative time was 91 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.4% of cases. One conversion to open surgery due to the intraoperative finding of a gallbladder carcinoma was observed and two patients needed an additional laparoscopic trocar. The rate of postoperative complications was 4.9% with a mean length of stay of 2.4 days. No significant differences were observed when comparing results between robotic novices and robotic experts. Patients with higher BMI trended towards longer surgical console and overall operative time, but resulted in similar rates of conversions and complications when compared to normal weight patients.CONCLUSIONSRobotic Single-Site cholecystectomy can be performed safely and effectively with low rates of complications and conversions in patients with differing BMI and by surgeons with varying levels of experience.
Background Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent developments, a robotic set of instrumentation to be used with the da Vinci Si Surgical System has been developed to overcome some of the technical challenges of manual single incision laparoscopy. Methods From February 2011 to February 2013, all consecutive robotic single site cholecystectomies (RSSC) were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Demographic, intra- and postoperative data of all patients that underwent RSSC at our institution were analyzed. Data were evaluated for the overall patient cohort as well as after stratification according to patient BMI (body mass index) and surgeon's experience. Results During the study period, 82 patients underwent robotic single site cholecystectomy at our institution. The dominating preoperative diagnosis was cholelithiasis. Mean overall operative time was 91min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.4% of cases. One conversion to open surgery due to the intraoperative finding of a gallbladder carcinoma was observed and two patients needed an additional laparoscopic trocar. The rate of postoperative complications was 4.9% with a mean length of stay of 2.4 days. No significant differences were observed when comparing results between robotic novices and robotic experts. Patients with higher BMI trended towards longer surgical console and overall operative time, but resulted in similar rates of conversions and complications when compared to normal weight patients. Conclusions Robotic Single-Site cholecystectomy can be performed safely and effectively with low rates of complications and conversions in patients with differing BMI and by surgeons with varying levels of experience.
Author Hagen, Monika E.
Jung, Minoa
Morel, Philippe
Buchs, Nicolas C.
Volonte, Francesco
Iranmanesh, Pouya
Pugin, François
Buehler, Leo
Azagury, Dan E.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Philippe
  surname: Morel
  fullname: Morel, Philippe
  organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Nicolas C.
  surname: Buchs
  fullname: Buchs, Nicolas C.
  organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Pouya
  surname: Iranmanesh
  fullname: Iranmanesh, Pouya
  organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
– sequence: 4
  givenname: François
  surname: Pugin
  fullname: Pugin, François
  organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Leo
  surname: Buehler
  fullname: Buehler, Leo
  organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Dan E.
  surname: Azagury
  fullname: Azagury, Dan E.
  organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Minoa
  surname: Jung
  fullname: Jung, Minoa
  organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Francesco
  surname: Volonte
  fullname: Volonte, Francesco
  organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Monika E.
  surname: Hagen
  fullname: Hagen, Monika E.
  email: monika.hagen@hcuge.ch
  organization: Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals Geneva, 4 Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24142898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp10FtLwzAYBuAgE6dz-A9ksAsF6cxpOVzqcJsyVIaHy9Cmqevsmtm0aP-9mZ27EAx85Lt4ePl4j0Art7kB4ATBAYIQXy4X0XpA2B44RIKJgEmBW7ud0zboOreE_hFEJIEHoI0polhIcQj6cxvZMtU9l-ZvmQlcWpqeXtjM6NqVRpd2VR-D_STMnOlu_w54Ht88jabB7GFyO7qaBZpSyII4JiiJiIw4lz4cQywjyaCJIRJcUAMpHrKYSMm1STQaah5BhqTQMkwYRyHpgPMmd13Yj8q4Uq1Sp02WhbmxlVOISsgplYh62v9Dl7Yqcn-dQhwyCf0Ir84apQvrXGEStS7SVVjUCkG1qU5tqlOEeXm6zauilYl37rcoDy4a8Jlmpv4vR91Nrx9_4oJGp77Dr50Oi3fFOOFD9Xo_UWhCx3yOx-qFfAOPPYUF
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_1856
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10029_017_1621_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_019_05049_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06693_2
crossref_primary_10_18528_ijgii180048
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_018_6300_3
crossref_primary_10_1097_FS9_0000000000000099
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_016_0662_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4658_z
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_23931
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4428_y
crossref_primary_10_7602_jmis_2017_20_1_16
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_015_4583_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_016_0223_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2015_03_052
crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2023_2293917
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_017_5939_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00104_016_0249_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_014_3916_9
crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_1789
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_017_5843_z
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v22_i2_736
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2022_0312
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_07229_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2016_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40137_016_0142_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijscr_2014_10_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_015_3135_0
crossref_primary_10_7602_jmis_2017_20_1_3
Cites_doi 10.1007/s11605-011-1688-2
10.1007/s00464-011-2087-1
10.1001/archsurg.2012.508
10.1007/s00464-007-9683-0
10.1002/rcs.1445
10.1007/s00464-012-2227-2
10.1007/s11605-009-1079-0
10.1007/s11701-011-0310-7
10.1159/000114196
10.1002/bjs.7126
10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0
10.1001/archsurg.2011.143
10.1002/bjs.8937
10.1007/s00464-011-1759-1
10.1089/lap.2011.0047
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery
2013 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
2013 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery
– notice: 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
– notice: 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
DBID BSCLL
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1002/jhbp.36
DatabaseName Istex
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1868-6982
EndPage 25
ExternalDocumentID 3787491261
10_1002_jhbp_36
24142898
JHBP36
ark_67375_WNG_1G4F7R2F_V
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Intuitive Surgical Inc
GroupedDBID ---
-5E
-5G
-BR
-Y2
0R~
0VY
1OC
2JY
2~H
30V
33P
3SF
4.4
52U
52V
53G
5VS
8-1
8TC
8UJ
95.
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAIAL
AANLZ
AANXM
AAONW
AARHV
AARTL
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYZH
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABQWH
ABTEG
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACBXY
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACOMO
ACPOU
ACREN
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADINQ
ADIZJ
ADKPE
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADQRH
ADRFC
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGNC
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AFBBN
AFBPY
AFEXP
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFLOW
AFPWT
AFWTZ
AGJBK
AHBTC
AHBYD
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BGNMA
BHBCM
BMXJE
BRXPI
BSCLL
C45
CSCUP
DCZOG
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
EN4
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
GODZA
GQ6
GQ8
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HMJXF
HVGLF
HZ~
IZIGR
JBSCW
KBYEO
LATKE
LEEKS
LITHE
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
M4Y
MA-
MEWTI
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
MY~
N2Q
NF~
NU0
O66
O9-
O93
O9I
OVD
P2W
P9S
PQQKQ
Q.N
QB0
QOS
R89
ROL
RSV
S37
S3B
SDE
SMD
SOJ
SUPJJ
SV3
SZN
TEORI
TSV
TUC
VC2
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WK8
WOHZO
WVDHM
WXSBR
Z45
Z7U
Z82
Z87
Z8V
~EX
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAMNL
AAYXX
CITATION
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4406-dd31fb39b7792892029b960ed018784e04256d3997cefc15c7b06198c9af671a3
IEDL.DBID 33P
ISSN 1868-6974
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 08:46:44 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 16:54:07 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 22:39:16 EST 2024
Tue Oct 15 23:47:02 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 01:00:08 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 30 09:52:05 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Cholecystectomy
Docking
Single incision
Da Vinci
Robotic
Single site
Language English
License 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4406-dd31fb39b7792892029b960ed018784e04256d3997cefc15c7b06198c9af671a3
Notes istex:78BCBB686A52230BC9FEF88C15619948A36DFC54
ark:/67375/WNG-1G4F7R2F-V
ArticleID:JHBP36
Intuitive Surgical Inc
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/jhbp.36
PMID 24142898
PQID 1706900698
PQPubID 2034613
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1490744914
proquest_journals_1706900698
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_36
pubmed_primary_24142898
wiley_primary_10_1002_jhbp_36_JHBP36
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_1G4F7R2F_V
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-01
January 2014
2014-Jan
2014-01-00
20140101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
– name: Tokyo
PublicationTitle Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences
PublicationTitleAlternate J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References Morel P, Pugin F, Bucher P, Buchs NC, Hagen ME. Robotic single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Robot Surg. 2012;6:273-274.
Testini M, Piccinni G, Lissidini G, Di Venere B, Gurrado A, Poli E, et al. Management of descending duodenal injuries secondary to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg. 2008;25:12-15.
Broeders IA. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2010;97:1007-1012). Br J Surg. 2010;97:1007-1012.
Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, Chand B, Escobar P, Kaouk J, et al. First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3566-3573.
Balaphas A, Hagen ME, Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonte F, Inan I, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopy single site surgery: a transdisciplinary review. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9:1-11.
Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. NIH Consens Statement. 1992;10:1-28.
Wren SM, Curet MJ. Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg. 2011;146:1122-1127.
Morel P, Hagen ME, Bucher P, Buchs NC, Pugin F. Robotic single-port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:2182-2186.
Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1205-1213.
Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A, et al. Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg. 2012;147:709-714.
Hagen ME, Meehan JJ, Inan I, Morel P. Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1505-1508.
Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, Chrysocheris P, Georgiou M. Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site ® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2687-2694.
Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, Guarino S, Santoro A, Parisi A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:191-208.
Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginesta C, Espert JJ, Martinez A, Benarroch G, et al. Single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes from a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21:683-686.
Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Thompson K, Jacobsen G, Spivack A, Wong B, et al. Supra-pubic single incision cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:404-407.
Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, Chrysocheris P, Georgiou M. Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site((R)) robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2687-2694.
Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, Lucido FS, Priora F, Bianchi PP, et al. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1648-1655.
2010; 97
2011; 146
2010; 14
2008; 25
2013; 100
2011; 21
2008; 22
2011; 15
2012; 26
2011; 25
2012; 6
2012; 147
1992; 10
2013; 9
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
(e_1_2_7_2_1) 1992; 10
References_xml – volume: 6
  start-page: 273
  year: 2012
  end-page: 274
  article-title: Robotic single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  publication-title: J Robot Surg
– volume: 146
  start-page: 1122
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1127
  article-title: Single‐port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single‐site surgical platform
  publication-title: Arch Surg
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1505
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1508
  article-title: Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 14
  start-page: 404
  year: 2010
  end-page: 407
  article-title: Supra‐pubic single incision cholecystectomy
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
– volume: 26
  start-page: 2687
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2694
  article-title: Cholecystectomy using a novel Single‐Site ® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 147
  start-page: 709
  year: 2012
  end-page: 714
  article-title: Overcoming the challenges of single‐incision cholecystectomy with robotic single‐site technology
  publication-title: Arch Surg
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1648
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1655
  article-title: Single‐site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 25
  start-page: 12
  year: 2008
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Management of descending duodenal injuries secondary to laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  publication-title: Dig Surg
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1007
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1012
  article-title: Randomized clinical trial of single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2010;97:1007–1012)
  publication-title: Br J Surg
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 1992
  end-page: 28
  article-title: Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  publication-title: NIH Consens Statement
– volume: 100
  start-page: 191
  year: 2013
  end-page: 208
  article-title: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single‐incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  publication-title: Br J Surg
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 11
  article-title: Robotic laparoendoscopy single site surgery: a transdisciplinary review
  publication-title: Int J Med Robot
– volume: 26
  start-page: 2687
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2694
  article-title: Cholecystectomy using a novel Single‐Site((R)) robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1205
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1213
  article-title: Single‐incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 25
  start-page: 3566
  year: 2011
  end-page: 3573
  article-title: First human surgery with a novel single‐port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single‐Site platform
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 21
  start-page: 683
  year: 2011
  end-page: 686
  article-title: Single‐incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes from a single institution
  publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
– volume: 15
  start-page: 2182
  year: 2011
  end-page: 2186
  article-title: Robotic single‐port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1688-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2087-1
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.508
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9683-0
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1002/rcs.1445
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2227-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.508
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1079-0
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0310-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.1159/000114196
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2227-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.7126
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.143
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  article-title: Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  publication-title: NIH Consens Statement
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.8937
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1759-1
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0047
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1688-2
SSID ssj0000313930
Score 2.2673025
Snippet Background Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the...
Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most recent...
Background Minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the...
BACKGROUNDMinimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy are evolving in a surge for the best possible clinical outcome for the patients. As one of the most...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 18
SubjectTerms Body Mass Index
Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy - methods
Cholelithiasis - surgery
Da Vinci
Docking
Female
Humans
Intraoperative Complications
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Patients
Postoperative Complications
Robotic
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
Robotics
Single incision
Single site
Treatment Outcome
Title Robotic single-site cholecystectomy
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-1G4F7R2F-V/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjhbp.36
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24142898
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1706900698
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1490744914
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA4-Ll584Ku6SgX1VnbbpE1z9LW7eBDxfQvNC_GxFdcFvfkT_I3-EmfS3cqCguCp0GRoOsl0vpk03xCyrYVgLnYuElaYCDy-jXLNXOTSlOtWrqmwvnTCOT-5yQ-PkCanLvVV8UPUCTe0DP-9RgMvVL_5TRp6d6sgYkeybYgR_OENelpnV5CRUPhCI0gHH2WAmqsTsyjcHIqOuaJp1OrrTzhzHLZ6v9Oe-8eI58nsEGyGe9XqWCATtrdIds5KVcKNELMED_bz_QM3kEPtC-Uir7N-KR_flshl--jioBsNiyVEmoFTjoyhsVNUKM4FBFFJKxEKohNrsOpeziwaZ2YAjnBtnY5TzRW4cpFrUbiMxwVdJlO9smdXSQhO3DCepJbBNU4KhZjJthx1xqhY04CEI73Jp4oTQ1bsx4nEd5Q0C8iu12fdXjzf4y9kPJXXJx0Zd1ibnyVteRWQxkjhcmg9fYmUPgI5lPOAbNXNsO5xM6Po2XIAfRiG9UzELCAr1UTVDwNUAlEVSm_7-fhtlPK4u39Ks7W_dVsnM4CWWJV_aZCpl-eB3SCTfTPY9IvvC-Yj2tM
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,1408,27933,27934,46064,46488
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3JTuQwEC2xHODCgBggDEuQGG4RndiJY25sTcMwLcR-sxIvQiwdBLQENz6Bb-RLqEq6g5BAQuIUKbYVp1yVelWOXwEsaym5C50LpJUmQI9vg1RzF7g4FrqRaiZtWTrhSLTP061toslZ65-Fqfgh6oQbWUb5vSYDp4T06jtr6OVFjiF7MgjDPEE1pOMb7KDOrxAnoSxLjRAhfJAgbq7OzNLo1d7YD85omOT6-BnS_AhcS8_T_PWTOY_DWA9v-uuVgkzAgO1Mwt_DIi_whk-Jgmv7-vxCe8i-LmvlErWzfihunn7DSXP7eLMV9OolBJqjXw6MYaHLmcyFkBhHRY1I5higWEOF91JuyT4Tg4hEaOt0GGuRozeXqZaZS0SYsSkY6hQdOwM--nHDRRRbjtcwynKCTbbhmDMmDzXzwO8LTt1WtBiqIkCOFL2jYokHK6VA6_bs7or-IhOxOmvvqHCHN8Vh1FSnHsz1Ja56BnSviNVHEo1y6sFS3YyqT_sZWccWXezDKbLnMuQeTFcrVT8MgQkGVjR6uVyQr2ap9lobByyZ_V63RRhpHf_fV_u77X9_YBTBE6_SMXMw9HDXtfMweG-6C6UmvgHDGN77
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1fT9swED8Blaa9jE2Mka1jQep4i6hjJ44fx9oA21RV3YC9WYn_CLGtqYBK7G0fYZ-RT7K7pA1CAmkST5Fin2KffbnfnZPfAfSMUsIz7yPllI3Q47soM8JHPkmk6WeGK1eXTvgqR9-zwZBoctpSXw0_RJtwI8uo39dk4DPr925JQ8_PSozY01XoCAThRJvP-bhNrxAloaorjRAffJQibG5-mSXpvYXsHV_UIbVe3wc07-LW2vHk648Y8nN4tkCb4Ydme7yAFTfdgPeTqqzwRkhpgp_u5s9fOkEOTV0pl4idzVX16_dLOM6H3z4eRotqCZER6JUjaznzJVellAqjqLgfqxLDE2ep7F4mHFlnahGPSOO8YYmRJfpylRlV-FSygm_C2rSaui0I0YtbIePECbyyuCgJNLm-597akhkeQLjUm541pBi6oT-ONc1R8zSA3VqfbXtx8YO-IZOJPh0daHYgcjmJc30SQHepcL0wn0tNnD6KSJSzAHbaZtz4dJpRTF01xz6C4nqhmAjgVbNQ7cMQlmBYRdK9ej0eGqX-dLg_5unr_-v2Dp6MB7n-cjT6_AaeInISTS6mC2tXF3P3FlYv7Xy73of_ACsv3aE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic+single%E2%80%90site+cholecystectomy&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+hepato-biliary-pancreatic+sciences&rft.au=Morel%2C+Philippe&rft.au=Buchs%2C+Nicolas+C.&rft.au=Iranmanesh%2C+Pouya&rft.au=Pugin%2C+Fran%C3%A7ois&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.issn=1868-6974&rft.eissn=1868-6982&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=25&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjhbp.36&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fjhbp.36&rft.externalDocID=JHBP36
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon