Prognostication in palliative radiotherapy—ProPaRT: Accuracy of prognostic scores

• Published in: Frontiers in oncology Vol. 12; p. 918414
• Main Authors: Maltoni, Marco, Scarpi, Emanuela, Dall’Agata, Monia, Micheletti, Simona, Pallotti, Maria Caterina, Pieri, Martina, Ricci, Marianna, Romeo, Antonino, Tenti, Maria Valentina, Tontini, Luca, Rossi, Romina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A 16-08-2022
• Subjects: aggressiveness of care; Oncology; outpatient palliative care; palliative radiotherapy; personalized palliative care; prognostication
• ISSN: 2234-943X; 2234-943X
• DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.918414

Background
Prognostication can be used within a tailored decision-making process to achieve a more personalized approach to the care of patients with cancer. This prospective observational study evaluated the accuracy of the Palliative Prognostic score (PaP score) to predict survival in patients identified by oncologists as candidates for palliative radiotherapy (PRT). We also studied interrater variability for the clinical prediction of survival and PaP scores and assessed the accuracy of the Survival Prediction Score (SPS) and TEACHH score.
Materials and methods
Consecutive patients were enrolled at first access to our Radiotherapy and Palliative Care Outpatient Clinic. The discriminating ability of the prognostic models was assessed using Harrell’s C index, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were obtained by bootstrapping.
Results
In total, 255 patients with metastatic cancer were evaluated, and 123 (48.2%) were selected for PRT, all of whom completed treatment without interruption. Then, 10.6% of the irradiated patients who died underwent treatment within the last 30 days of life. The PaP score showed an accuracy of 74.8 (95% CI, 69.5–80.1) for radiation oncologist (RO) and 80.7 (95% CI, 75.9–85.5) for palliative care physician (PCP) in predicting 30-day survival. The accuracy of TEACHH was 76.1 (95% CI, 70.9–81.3) and 64.7 (95% CI, 58.8–70.6) for RO and PCP, respectively, and the accuracy of SPS was 70 (95% CI, 64.4–75.6) and 72.8 (95% CI, 67.3–78.3).
Conclusion
Accurate prognostication can identify candidates for low-fraction PRT during the last days of life who are more likely to complete the planned treatment without interruption.
All the scores showed good discriminating capacity; the PaP had the higher accuracy, especially when used in a multidisciplinary way.