Adverse effects of homeopathy: we clearly need more details

[...]Stub et al. should have made clear that it was by excluding the trials by Aabel 2000 and Brien 2010 from meta-analysis that their analysed totals for trial participants (2947 and 2966 above) differed from the corresponding totals of 3033 and 3022 presented in their Table 4.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Complementary therapies in medicine Vol. 29; p. 235
Main Authors: Mathie, Robert T, Roberts, E. Rachel, Rutten, A.L.B. (Lex)
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Scotland Elsevier Ltd 01-12-2016
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[...]Stub et al. should have made clear that it was by excluding the trials by Aabel 2000 and Brien 2010 from meta-analysis that their analysed totals for trial participants (2947 and 2966 above) differed from the corresponding totals of 3033 and 3022 presented in their Table 4.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ISSN:0965-2299
1873-6963
DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2016.05.011