Subgroup analyses of the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab in Japanese and Western patients in RAINBOW: a randomized clinical trial in second-line treatment of gastric cancer

Background We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients previously treated for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in Japanese and Western subgroups from the RAINBOW trial. Methods Patients received ramuciruma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 927 - 938
Main Authors: Shitara, Kohei, Muro, Kei, Shimada, Yasuhiro, Hironaka, Shuichi, Sugimoto, Naotoshi, Komatsu, Yoshito, Nishina, Tomohiro, Yamaguchi, Kensei, Segawa, Yoshihiko, Omuro, Yasushi, Tamura, Takao, Doi, Toshihiko, Yukisawa, Seigo, Yasui, Hirofumi, Nagashima, Fumio, Gotoh, Masahiro, Esaki, Taito, Emig, Michael, Chandrawansa, Kumari, Liepa, Astra M., Wilke, Hansjochen, Ichimiya, Yukako, Ohtsu, Atsushi
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Tokyo Springer Japan 01-07-2016
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients previously treated for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in Japanese and Western subgroups from the RAINBOW trial. Methods Patients received ramucirumab at 8 mg/kg or placebo (days 1 and 15) plus paclitaxel at 80 mg/m 2 (days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle). End points were compared between treatment arms within Japanese ( N  = 140) and Western ( N  = 398) populations. Results The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was higher for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in both populations (Japanese population, 83.8 % vs 52.1 %; Western population, 79.1 % vs 61.9 %). Neutropenia was the commonest adverse event of grade 3 or higher, with a higher incidence for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (Japanese population, 66.2 % vs 25.4 %; Western population, 32.1 % vs 14.7 %). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was low and was similar between treatment arms in both populations. The overall survival hazard ratio was 0.88 (95 % confidence interval, 0.60–1.28) in the Japanese population and 0.73 (95 % confidence interval, 0.58–0.91) in the Western population. The progression-free survival hazard ratio was 0.50 (95 % confidence interval, 0.35–0.73) in the Japanese population and 0.63 (95 % confidence interval, 0.51–0.79) in the Western population. The objective response rate was higher for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in both populations (Japanese population, 41.2 % vs 19.4 %; Western population, 26.8 % vs 13.0 %), as was the 6-month survival rate (Japanese population, 94.1 % vs 71.4 %; Western population, 66.0 % vs 49.0 %). Conclusions Safety profiles of the ramucirumab plus paclitaxel arm were similar between populations, though there was a higher incidence of neutropenia in Japanese patients. Progression-free survival and objective response rate improvements were observed for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in both populations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01170663
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1436-3291
1436-3305
DOI:10.1007/s10120-015-0559-z