Induction Therapy Does Not Increase Surgical Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Cancer

A complete pathological response after induction therapy for esophageal cancer offers survival benefits, but induction therapy may increase the risk of postoperative complications and mortality. We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Annals of thoracic surgery Vol. 78; no. 5; pp. 1783 - 1789
Main Authors: Lin, Frank C.-F., Durkin, Amy E., Ferguson, Mark K.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-11-2004
Elsevier Science
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A complete pathological response after induction therapy for esophageal cancer offers survival benefits, but induction therapy may increase the risk of postoperative complications and mortality. We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer to identify preoperative predictors of complications and assess the possible influence of induction therapy on surgical outcomes. Between 1988 and 2003, 170 esophagectomies were performed on our service; 95 (55.9%) underwent surgery alone and 75 (44.1%) received preoperative chemotherapy, 35 of whom also had preoperative radiation therapy. Based on multivariable regression analyses, independent covariates for complication categories included performance status (pulmonary, cardiovascular, total complications, and death), age (cardiovascular and other complications), and FEV 1% (pulmonary complications). Whether patients received induction therapy was unrelated to the incidence of postoperative complications. We found no evidence that induction therapy adversely influences the incidence of postoperative morbidity or mortality after esophagectomy for cancer.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0003-4975
1552-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.081