Epidemiology and outcome of Rhodotorula infection in haematological patients
Summary Rhodotorula spp. are emergent opportunistic pathogens, particularly in haematological patients. However, no systematic review of this infection has been undertaken in this high‐risk patient group. The aim of this study was to review all reported cases of Rhodotorula infection to determine th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mycoses Vol. 54; no. 4; pp. 318 - 324 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-07-2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary
Rhodotorula spp. are emergent opportunistic pathogens, particularly in haematological patients. However, no systematic review of this infection has been undertaken in this high‐risk patient group. The aim of this study was to review all reported cases of Rhodotorula infection to determine the epidemiology and outcome of this infection in this high‐risk population. The 29 reported cases were fungaemias. The most common underlying haematological disorder was the presence of acute leukaemia (65.5%). Rhodotorula mucilaginosa was the species found more frequently (79.3%). Most cases (58.6%) had several risk factors (≥3) simultaneously. The most common predisposing factors were the presence of central venous catheter (CVC, 100%) and neutropenia (62.1%). A substantial number of patients (81.5%) received antifungal treatment with amphotericin B. The overall mortality was higher (13.8%) than that described in non‐haematological patients (5.8% in solid‐organ neoplasms and 9% in AIDS or other chronic diseases). Patients with acute leukaemia had a higher mortality rate (15.7%) than patients with non‐Hodgkin’s lymphoma (0%). Our data suggest that patients with acute leukaemia might be managed as high‐risk patients and intensive measures might be taken. In addition, it appears that the subgroup of patients without acute leukaemia have a good outcome and might be managed as low‐risk patients with a less intensive approach. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:MYC1868 istex:9EB46341B1046381C462BC35D28DF0820C4A0ABB ark:/67375/WNG-F7Z1NJKH-F SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-4 ObjectType-Undefined-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-2 ObjectType-Article-3 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0933-7407 1439-0507 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01868.x |