Comparative study of environmental factors influencing motor task learning and memory retention in sighted and blind crayfish

In classical conditioning, an alteration in response occurs when two stimuli are regularly paired in close succession. An area of particular research interest is classical conditioning with a chemical signal and visual and/or tactile stimuli as the unconditional stimuli, to test manipulative and mot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and behavior Vol. 3; no. 1; pp. 4 - 13
Main Authors: Bierbower, Sonya M., Shuranova, Zhanna P., Viele, Kert, Cooper, Robin L.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-01-2013
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In classical conditioning, an alteration in response occurs when two stimuli are regularly paired in close succession. An area of particular research interest is classical conditioning with a chemical signal and visual and/or tactile stimuli as the unconditional stimuli, to test manipulative and motor behaviors in a learning paradigm. A classical learning task chamber was developed to examine learning trends in a sighted surface‐dwelling crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, and in a blind cave‐dwelling crayfish, Orconectes australis packardi. We examined whether learning is influenced by environmental factors and/or reliance on different primary sensory modalities. Crayfish were trained to manipulate a large, cumbersome cheliped through a small access point to obtain a food reward. In both species, acquisition of the learning task was rapid when they were in nonstressed conditions. The blind crayfish tested in low white light did not successfully complete the task, suggesting a stress response. Schematic representation of the motor task conditioning chamber. The chamber is divided into two compartments, the larger one housing the animal and the smaller one containing a mesh platform with the food reward. Food was attached to the mesh screen. (A) A stylized angled view including the two compartments and mesh screen with worms attached. The location of the access point is indicated by the arrow. (B) Side view schematic to show placement of the mesh platform and the manipulative task of reaching in and up to obtain the food reward.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Funding Information Support was provided by G. Ribble Fellowship for undergraduates in the Department of Biology at the University of Kentucky (C. Allen, S. Naik, Y. Boycheko, V. Galperin, and B. Kelly), G. Ribble Graduate Fellowship (S. M. B.), and personal funds (R. L. C.).
ISSN:2162-3279
2162-3279
DOI:10.1002/brb3.106