Investigating the Ability to Identify New Constructions in Urban Areas Using Images from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Google Earth, and Sentinel-2

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 14; no. 13; p. 3227
• Main Authors: Aliabad, Fahime Arabi, Malamiri, Hamid Reza Ghafarian, Shojaei, Saeed, Sarsangi, Alireza, Ferreira, Carla Sofia Santos, Kalantari, Zahra
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01-07-2022
• Subjects: Accuracy; Bayesian analysis; Classification; Coefficients; Decision trees; Developing countries; Earth; Image classification; Information sources; Land cover; land cover change; Land use; LDCs; Nearest-neighbor; object-based classification; Pixels; Remote sensing; satellite images; Satellites; Social conditions; Social problems; Software; Suburban areas; Support vector machines; UAV; Unmanned aerial vehicles; Urban areas; Urban development; Urban sprawl; Vegetation; Vegetation cover; Iran
• DOI: 10.3390/rs14133227
• EISSN: 2072-4292

One of the main problems in developing countries is unplanned urban growth and land use change. Timely identification of new constructions can be a good solution to mitigate some environmental and social problems. This study examined the possibility of identifying new constructions in urban areas using images from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), Google Earth and Sentinel-2. The accuracy of the land cover map obtained using these images was investigated using pixel-based processing methods (maximum likelihood, minimum distance, Mahalanobis, spectral angle mapping (SAM)) and object-based methods (Bayes, support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest-neighbor (KNN), decision tree, random forest). The use of DSM to increase the accuracy of classification of UAV images and the use of NDVI to identify vegetation in Sentinel-2 images were also investigated. The object-based KNN method was found to have the greatest accuracy in classifying UAV images (kappa coefficient = 0.93), and the use of DSM increased the classification accuracy by 4%. Evaluations of the accuracy of Google Earth images showed that KNN was also the best method for preparing a land cover map using these images (kappa coefficient = 0.83). The KNN and SVM methods showed the highest accuracy in preparing land cover maps using Sentinel-2 images (kappa coefficient = 0.87 and 0.85, respectively). The accuracy of classification was not increased when using NDVI due to the small percentage of vegetation cover in the study area. On examining the advantages and disadvantages of the different methods, a novel method for identifying new rural constructions was devised. This method uses only one UAV imaging per year to determine the exact position of urban areas with no constructions and then examines spectral changes in related Sentinel-2 pixels that might indicate new constructions in these areas. On-site observations confirmed the accuracy of this method.