Molecular epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in a cystic fibrosis outpatient clinic

Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clínicas, *Laboratory of Virology, Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo and Microbiology Section of the Central Laboratory, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil Corresponding author: Dr L.V.F. da Silva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical microbiology Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 261 - 267
Main Authors: DA SILVA FILHO, LUIZ V. F, LEVI, JOSE E, BENTO, CHRISTINA N. O, RODRIGUES, JOAQUIM C, DA SILVA RAMOS, SONIA R. T
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Reading Soc General Microbiol 01-03-2001
Society for General Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clínicas, *Laboratory of Virology, Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo and Microbiology Section of the Central Laboratory, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil Corresponding author: Dr L.V.F. da Silva Filho (e-mail: vicres{at}usp.br ). Received 17 March 2000; revised version accepted 11 August 2000. Abstract Chronic respiratory infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a significant determinant in the prognosis of cystic fibrosis patients. Cross-infection between cystic fibrosis patients and the prevalence of P. aeruginosa among them were investigated by microbiological surveillance and RAPD typing of the isolates. A total of 748 samples was cultured, including specimens from the respiratory tract (sputum or throat swabs) and hands of patients and medical staff, resulting in the collection of 86 isolates of P. aeruginosa from 65 samples. Prevalence of P. aeruginosa was 39.3% in respiratory samples, 0.2% on patients’ hands and none in the medical staff's hand samples. RAPD typing characterised 51 genotypes and clonal persistence was observed in the majority of patients. These results suggest that cross-infection is not common in the outpatient clinic studied and a common source of acquisition is unlikely.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0022-2615
1473-5644
DOI:10.1099/0022-1317-50-3-261