Mutations in the NS5A and E2-PePHD region of hepatitis C virus type 1b and correlation with the response to combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin

Nonstructural 5A (NS5A) and the second envelope (E2) proteins of hepatitis C virus (HCV) have the potential to block interferon (IFN)‐induced RNA‐dependent protein kinase (PKR) and may therefore interfere with the response to IFN therapy, but controversy still exists regarding the relevance of this....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of viral hepatitis Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 87 - 94
Main Authors: Hung, C.-H., Lee, C.-M., Lu, S.-N., Lee, J.-F., Wang, J.-H., Tung, H.-D., Chen, T.-M., Hu, T.-H., Chen, W.-J., Changchien, C.-S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01-03-2003
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Nonstructural 5A (NS5A) and the second envelope (E2) proteins of hepatitis C virus (HCV) have the potential to block interferon (IFN)‐induced RNA‐dependent protein kinase (PKR) and may therefore interfere with the response to IFN therapy, but controversy still exists regarding the relevance of this. This study aimed to assess whether mutations in these regions correlated with the response to combination therapy, IFN and ribavirin. Pretreatment parameters were analysed in 57 HCV‐1b patients who had received IFN‐α2b (3 or 5 MU three times weekly) and ribavirin (800–1200 mg per day) for 24 weeks. The amino acid sequences of the NS5A and PKR‐eIF2α phosphorylation homology domain (E2‐PePHD) were deduced from the corresponding coding sequence, which were determinated by direct sequencing of the HCV genome amplified by the polymerase chain reaction. Twenty (36%) patients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). The mean number of amino acid substitutions in the NS5A–PKR binding domain (2209–2274), interferon sensitivity‐determining region (ISDR) (2209–2248), and E2‐PePHD sequence (659–670) in patients with and without SVR were 4.53 ± 3.31 vs 2.83 ± 1.78 (P = 0.094), 2.45 ± 2.74 vs 1.03 ± 1.32 (P = 0.042) and 0.25 ± 0.70 vs 0.03 ± 0.17 (P = 0.109), respectively. Patients with a mutant‐type (≥ 4) NS5A–ISDR had a higher rate of SVR (six of nine, 67%) than those with wild‐type (five of 22, 23%) (P = 0.038). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis of the factors (age, gender, viral load, cirrhosis rate, IFN dosage and amino acid substitutions) revealed that the mutation in NS5A–ISDR (≥ 4 vs < 4) was the only independent variable of treatment outcome. Our study showed that NS5A–ISDR mutations were correlated with the SVR to combination therapy in chronic HCV‐1b patients in Taiwan.
Bibliography:istex:69A62DF27E86BA7995BFE2091D688645EFB69B84
ArticleID:JVH414
ark:/67375/WNG-G4NCSN6G-0
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1352-0504
1365-2893
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2893.2003.00414.x