High prevalence of biochemical acromegaly in primary care patients with elevated IGF-1 levels

Summary Objective  The estimated prevalence of acromegaly is 40–125 per million. The diagnosis of acromegaly is often delayed due to deficits in recognizing the signs of the disease. It is not known how many subjects with increased IGF‐1 levels have acromegaly. We aimed to assess the prevalence of a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical endocrinology (Oxford) Vol. 69; no. 3; pp. 432 - 435
Main Authors: Schneider, H. J., Sievers, C., Saller, B., Wittchen, H. U., Stalla, G. K.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-09-2008
Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Objective  The estimated prevalence of acromegaly is 40–125 per million. The diagnosis of acromegaly is often delayed due to deficits in recognizing the signs of the disease. It is not known how many subjects with increased IGF‐1 levels have acromegaly. We aimed to assess the prevalence of acromegaly in primary care by screening for elevated IGF‐1 levels. Design  A cross‐sectional, epidemiological study (the DETECT study). Patients  A total of 6773 unselected adult primary care patients were included. Measurements  We measured IGF‐1 in all patients and recommended further endocrine evaluation in all patients with elevated IGF‐1 levels (> 2 age‐dependent SDS). Results  Of 125 patients with elevated IGF‐1 levels, 76 patients had indeterminate results and acromegaly could be excluded in 42 patients. One patient had known florid acromegaly. Two patients had newly diagnosed acromegaly and pituitary adenomas. Four patients had biochemical acromegaly but refused further diagnostics. This corresponds to a prevalence of 1034 per million patients. Conclusions  Our study shows a high prevalence of undiagnosed acromegaly in primary care. These results imply that acromegaly is underdiagnosed and stress the importance of detecting acromegaly.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-T0B4VQ44-Z
ArticleID:CEN3221
istex:73A1D1F2E77E5591DDB58613A169681723509377
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0300-0664
1365-2265
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03221.x