Sensitive lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of pork additives in raw and cooked meat products
•Porcine immunoglobulins (IgG) are used as a biomarker for pork identification.•A sandwich lateral flow immunoassay of porcine IgG has been developed.•The test system enables the detection of 0.063% (w/w) of pork content in raw meat.•Specific IgG can be recognized in raw meat and cooked meat product...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food chemistry Vol. 359; p. 129927 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Elsevier Ltd
15-10-2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Porcine immunoglobulins (IgG) are used as a biomarker for pork identification.•A sandwich lateral flow immunoassay of porcine IgG has been developed.•The test system enables the detection of 0.063% (w/w) of pork content in raw meat.•Specific IgG can be recognized in raw meat and cooked meat products.•The assay can be used for point-of-care screening of meat products’ authenticity.
In this study, we developed a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for the detection of pork additives in meat products. LFIA of porcine immunoglobulins (IgG) as a molecular biomarker was carried out in a sandwich format for species identification. Gold nanoparticles as a nano-dispersed label were conjugated to secondary antibodies specific to anti-porcine IgG. The test system was characterized by high specificity, which was confirmed by the absence of cross-reactivity with any other species tested. A short technique of sample preparation was proposed aimed at the effective extraction of IgG from meat samples. The developed LFIA enabled the detection of a pork ingredient at a level as low as 0.063% (w/w) in raw meat within 35 min including sample preparation. A large panel of real meat samples was analyzed by the LFIA. The results showed that porcine IgG can be reliably recognized both in raw meat products and processed meat foodstuffs. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0308-8146 1873-7072 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129927 |