Meta-analysis for combining relative risks of alcohol consumption and prostate cancer
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer has become the most common cancer among men in the United States, but little is known about factors associated with prostate cancer incidence. METHODS A meta‐analysis of studies published prior to July 1998 was conducted to pool relative risk (RR) estimates from the existi...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Prostate Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 56 - 66 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01-01-2000
Wiley-Liss |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | BACKGROUND
Prostate cancer has become the most common cancer among men in the United States, but little is known about factors associated with prostate cancer incidence.
METHODS
A meta‐analysis of studies published prior to July 1998 was conducted to pool relative risk (RR) estimates from the existing literature on the association between prostate cancer and alcohol consumption, in an attempt to determine whether there is an association, and if so, what its magnitude is.
RESULTS
The overall pooled RR estimate was 1.05 for both fixed and random effects models, based on six cohort studies and 27 case‐control studies. The RR estimate varied little by study design. Among types of consumption, the highest risk was found for beer (RR = 1.27), but this was based on only eight studies that reported type of alcohol consumed. A linear dose‐response was fit to the 15 studies reporting amount of alcohol consumed, finding a RR of 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91–1.20) for each additional drink of alcohol per day or a RR of 1.21 for 4 drinks per day. When the average drinks per day consumed in the 15 studies were used to estimate the overall risk for all 33 studies, a RR of 1.02 was found for each additional drink of alcohol per day.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, no association between prostate cancer and alcohol consumption was seen. While some categories of consumption showed an increased risk, the studies reporting such categories appeared to be biased towards reporting a positive association among the categories. Prostate 42:56–66, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:0FF6CED3F8C4EF2FEC4D0B84E5A41CE9690B2F9E ark:/67375/WNG-N767CCXP-Z Cleveland Foundation - No. 94C1533 94-0610 ArticleID:PROS7 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0270-4137 1097-0045 |
DOI: | 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(20000101)42:1<56::AID-PROS7>3.0.CO;2-P |