Randomized controlled trial of two cigarette quit programmes in coronary care patients after acute myocardial infarction

Background: Tobacco cessation after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) substantially improves outcome but how effective individual programmes are needs to be established. To date, few studies have examined this factor. Aims: To assess the outcome of two smoking cessation programmes after AMI. Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Internal medicine journal Vol. 31; no. 8; pp. 470 - 475
Main Authors: Feeney, G. F. X., McPherson, A., Connor, J. P., McAlister, A., Young, R. M., Garrahy, P.
Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Published: Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Science Pty 01-11-2001
Blackwell Science
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Tobacco cessation after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) substantially improves outcome but how effective individual programmes are needs to be established. To date, few studies have examined this factor. Aims: To assess the outcome of two smoking cessation programmes after AMI. Methods: One hundred and ninety‐eight current smokers admitted to coronary care with an AMI participated in a randomized controlled study comparing two outpatient tobacco interventions, the Stanford Heart Attack Staying Free (SF) programme and a Usual Care (UC) programme. Results: Log–rank analyses revealed that patients in the SF programme were retained longer (P < 0.001) and had higher cotinine validated abstinence rates (P < 0.001) compared with patients in the UC programme. Twelve months after intervention, 39% of the SF programme compared with 2% of the UC programme demonstrated cotinine validated tobacco cessation, representing a significant reduced relapse rate in the SF programme (χ2, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The SF smoking cessation programme initiated in hospital can significantly reduce smoking rates at 12 months after myocardial infarction. Although superior to the UC quit programme, Australian outcomes were lower than the American programme originators’ published outcomes. (Intern Med J 2001; 31: 470–475)
Bibliography:istex:733D956705C77F8D810F29F4850B0D709EFCE945
ArticleID:IMJ110
ark:/67375/WNG-KK8TJKH1-4
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1444-0903
1445-5994
DOI:10.1046/j.1445-5994.2001.00110.x