Social media intervention for promoting breastfeeding among WIC participants

Social media have emerged as a promising communication channel for promoting breastfeeding among a new generation of mothers. Yet, there is no published study reporting the effects of a large-scale social media intervention on key breastfeeding-related perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors. As a com...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food science & nutrition Vol. 11; no. 11; pp. 6945 - 6954
Main Authors: Sanchez, Louisiana M, Park, Sung-Yeon, Kohnen, Taya, Sarnquist, Bret, Jeon, Hyo Jin Jean, Granner, Michelle, Morning, Kelly, MacNeil, Patricia, Deavers, Olivia, Soto, Valery, Christiansen, Elizabeth
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-11-2023
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Social media have emerged as a promising communication channel for promoting breastfeeding among a new generation of mothers. Yet, there is no published study reporting the effects of a large-scale social media intervention on key breastfeeding-related perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors. As a component of its breastfeeding promotion campaign, the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program implemented a 12-month intervention using Facebook and Instagram and subsequently evaluated the outcomes by surveying WIC-participating women (  = 832) twice, immediately before and after the intervention. Based on their level of exposure to the intervention messages, the women were retrospectively classified into two groups, resulting in a two-group (no-low exposure vs. medium-high exposure) quasi-experiment. Women in the medium-high exposure group, in comparison with women in the no-low exposure group, exhibited higher campaign awareness (  < .001), visits to the campaign website (  < .001), and engagement with the website content (  < .001). They also reported more positive breastfeeding attitudes (  = 17.26 vs.  = 16.51,  < .05), self-efficacy (  = 54.48 vs.  = 49.94,  < .01), and social support (  = 27.37 vs.  = 25.11,  < .001). But they did not differ from women in the no-low exposure group in breastfeeding initiation (  > .05) and duration (  > .05). In conclusion, a social media-based intervention resulted in more positive breastfeeding attitudes, higher self-efficacy, and higher perceived social support. Future studies need to investigate the optimal level of intervention message dosage that prompts significant behavioral changes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2048-7177
2048-7177
DOI:10.1002/fsn3.3620