Operative efficiency: a comparative analysis of Versius and da Vinci robotic systems in abdominal surgery

• Published in: Journal of robotic surgery Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 132
• Main Authors: Halabi, Mouhammad, Khoury, Kayanne, Alomar, Abdulrahman, Dahdah, Joseph El, Hassan, Obai, Hayyan, Khadija, Bishara, Engy, Moussa, Hatem
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Springer London 22-03-2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdomen; Abdominal surgery; Age; Alcohol use; Body mass index; Cardiovascular disease; Cholecystectomy; Data collection; Demographics; Diabetes; Females; Hernias; Hypertension; Learning curves; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Metabolic disorders; Minimally Invasive Surgery; Patients; Robotic surgery; Surgeons; Surgery; Urology; Robotic surgery; Cholecystectomy; Hernia; Versius; da Vinci
• ISSN: 1863-2491; 1863-2483; 1863-2491
• DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01806-5

Robotic-assisted surgery has gained momentum in the pursuit of improved minimally invasive procedures. The adoption of new robotic platforms, such as the Versius, raises concerns about safety, efficacy, and learning curves. This study compares the Versius to the well-established da Vinci in terms of operative time and patient population. Retrospective data collection was conducted on patient data from inguinal hernia surgery, ventral hernia surgery, and cholecystectomies performed between February 2022 and March 2023 at the American Hospital of Dubai. Only experienced cases were included, ensuring proficiency with robotic technology. Versius had longer procedure times in inguinal and ventral hernia surgeries but not in cholecystectomy. No intraoperative complications were observed in either system. This study demonstrates that Versius can provide comparable outcomes to the da Vinci in abdominal surgery, with no observed intraoperative complications.