Knowledge, attitudes, and practices associated with zoonotic disease transmission risk in North Sulawesi, Indonesia

• Published in: One health outlook Vol. 4; no. 1; p. 11
• Main Authors: Kusumaningrum, Tina, Latinne, Alice, Martinez, Stephanie, Kalengkongan, Jusuf, Wiyatno, Ageng, Dewantari, Aghnianditya Kresno, Kasenda, Novie, Bernadus, Janno B B, Jaya, Ungke Anton, Ma'roef, Chairin Nisa, Francisco, Leilani, Hagan, Emily, Miller, Maureen, Myint, Khin Saw Aye, Daszak, Peter, Olival, Kevin J, Saputro, Suryo, Pamungkas, Joko, Safari, Dodi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central 03-06-2022; BMC
• Subjects: Animal diseases; Animals; Attitude; Biological samples; Community involvement; Coronaviruses; Data collection; Disease; Disease transmission; Enrollments; Epidemics; Ethnography; Focus groups; Health risks; Hunting; Informed consent; Interviews; Knowledge; Pathogens; Practice; Qualitative research; Questionnaires; Risk; Risk taking; Towns; Viruses; Wildlife; Wildlife trade; Zoonoses; Zoonotic; Southeast Asia; United States > US; Sulawesi; Indonesia; Attitude; Wildlife; Practice; Risk; Zoonotic; Knowledge; Indonesia
• ISSN: 2524-4655; 2524-4655
• DOI: 10.1186/s42522-022-00067-w

Hunters, vendors, and consumers are key actors in the wildlife trade value chain in North Sulawesi, Indonesia, and potentially face an elevated risk of exposure to zoonotic diseases. Understanding the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) associated with the risk of zoonotic disease transmission in these communities is therefore critical for developing recommendations to prevent or mitigate zoonotic outbreaks in the future.
Qualitative and quantitative methods were combined to understand KAP associated zoonotic diseases transmission risk in communities involved in the wildlife trade in North Sulawesi. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured ethnographic interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) while quantitative data were collected using questionnaires. We conducted 46 ethnographic interviews and 2 FGDs in 2016, and 477 questionnaire administrations in 2017-2018 in communities from five districts in North Sulawesi. We also collected biological specimens, including nasal swab, oropharyngeal swab, and blood, from 254 participants. The study sites were targeted based on known wildlife consumption and trade activities. The participants for qualitative data collection were purposively selected while participants for quantitative data collection were randomly selected. Biological samples were tested for five viral families including Coronaviridae, Filoviridae, Flaviviridae, Orthomyxoviridae and Paramyxoviridae.
Knowledge regarding disease transmission from animals to humans was similar across the participants in qualitative focus groups, including knowledge of rabies and bird flu as zoonotic diseases. However, only a small fraction of the participants from the quantitative group (1%) considered that contact with wild animals could cause sickness. Our biological specimen testing identified a single individual (1/254, 0.004%) who was sampled in 2018 with serological evidence of sarbecovirus exposure. Overall, participants were aware of some level of risk in working with open wounds while slaughtering or butchering an animal (71%) but most did not know what the specific risks were. However, significant differences in the attitudes or beliefs around zoonotic disease risk and health seeking behaviors were observed across our study sites in North Sulawesi.
Our study showed variable levels of knowledge, attitudes, and practices associated with the risk of zoonotic disease transmission among study participants. These findings can be used to develop locally responsive recommendations to mitigate zoonotic disease transmission.