Effectiveness of BNT162b2 BA.4/5 Bivalent mRNA Vaccine Against Symptomatic COVID-19 Among Immunocompetent Individuals Testing at a Large US Retail Pharmacy

Abstract Background Data on the effectiveness of BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine stratified by age and prior infection are lacking. Methods This test-negative study used data from individuals ≥5 years of age testing for SARS-CoV-2 with symptoms (15 September 2022 to 31 January 2023) at a large national reta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of infectious diseases Vol. 229; no. 3; pp. 648 - 659
Main Authors: Rudolph, Abby E, Khan, Farid L, Shah, Amy, Singh, Tanya G, Wiemken, Timothy L, Puzniak, Laura A, Jodar, Luis, McLaughlin, John M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Oxford University Press 14-03-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Data on the effectiveness of BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine stratified by age and prior infection are lacking. Methods This test-negative study used data from individuals ≥5 years of age testing for SARS-CoV-2 with symptoms (15 September 2022 to 31 January 2023) at a large national retail pharmacy chain. The exposure was receipt of 2–4 wild-type doses and a BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine (>2 months since last wild-type dose). The outcome was a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Absolute (vs unvaccinated) and relative (vs 2–4 wild-type doses) vaccine effectiveness (VE) were calculated as (1 − adjusted odds ratio from logistic regression) × 100. VE was stratified by age and self-reported prior infection. Results Overall, 307 885 SARS-CoV-2 tests were included (7916 aged 5–11, 16 329 aged 12–17, and 283 640 aged ≥18 years). SARS-CoV-2 positivity was 39%; 21% were unvaccinated, 70% received 2–4 wild-type doses with no bivalent vaccine, and 9% received a BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent dose. At a median of 1–2 months after BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent vaccination, depending on age group, absolute VE was 22%–60% and was significantly higher among those reporting prior infection (range, 55%–79%) than not (range, no protection to 50%). Relative VE was 31%–64%. Conclusions BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent showed early additional protection against Omicron-related symptomatic COVID-19, with hybrid immunity offering greater protection. The BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine provided early additional protection against Omicron-related symptomatic COVID-19 among immunocompetent individuals aged ≥5 years when BA.4/5 and XBB-related sublineages were circulating. In general, effectiveness was highest among those self-reporting prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Potential conflicts of interest. A. E. R., F. L. K., T. L. W., L. A. P., L. J., and J. M. M. are employees and shareholders of Pfizer. A. S. and T. A. S. are employees and shareholders of Walgreens. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
1537-6613
DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiad474