Associations between myside bias on an informal reasoning task and amount of post-secondary education

One hundred and twelve undergraduate university students completed an informal reasoning task in which they were asked to generate arguments both for and against the position they endorsed on three separate issues. Performance on this task was evaluated by comparing the number of arguments they gene...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied cognitive psychology Vol. 17; no. 7; pp. 851 - 860
Main Authors: Toplak, Maggie E., Stanovich, Keith E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01-11-2003
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:One hundred and twelve undergraduate university students completed an informal reasoning task in which they were asked to generate arguments both for and against the position they endorsed on three separate issues. Performance on this task was evaluated by comparing the number of arguments they generated which endorsed (myside arguments) and which refuted (otherside arguments) their own position on that issue. Participants generated more myside arguments than otherside arguments on all three issues, thus consistently showing a myside bias effect on each issue. Differences in cognitive ability were not associated with individual differences in myside bias. However, year in university was a significant predictor of myside bias. The degree of myside bias decreased systematically with year in university. Year in university remained a significant predictor of myside bias even when both cognitive ability and age were statistically partialled out. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:ArticleID:ACP915
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
istex:398A5C91232A81AA7B9511A3E2F4115D63639DD4
ark:/67375/WNG-FB6JGDWK-L
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0888-4080
1099-0720
DOI:10.1002/acp.915