A Framework for Evaluation Technical Assistance
The primary goal of the evaluation technical assistance (TA) was to help the grantees and their evaluators produce rigorous evidence of program effectiveness that would meet the US Department of Health and Human Services iHHS) Teen Pregnancy Prevention iTPP) evidence review standards, described in C...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of public health (1971) Vol. 106; no. S1; pp. S24 - S26 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
American Public Health Association
01-09-2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The primary goal of the evaluation technical assistance (TA) was to help the grantees and their evaluators produce rigorous evidence of program effectiveness that would meet the US Department of Health and Human Services iHHS) Teen Pregnancy Prevention iTPP) evidence review standards, described in Cole et al.1 To achieve this goal, the evaluation TA team created a framework for TA that included an initial design review, ongoing monitoring and group TA, and a series ofevaluation deliverables designed to serve as stepping stones toward the final evaluation report.This editorial is the second in a series of related opinion pieces. As noted above, the first editorial described the context of the evaluation TA contract, and outlined the I II IS evidence standards that were used as an operational goal fora high-quality evaluation. This second editorial describes the TA framework.The final editorial provides a summary of the challenges and lessons learned from the evaluation TA proiect, and offers insight into the ways that evaluation TA has been improved for future grantee funded evaluations. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 CONTRIBUTORS All authors contributed equally to this editorial. |
ISSN: | 0090-0036 1541-0048 |
DOI: | 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303365 |