Higher Gemcitabine Dose Was Associated With Better Outcome of Osteosarcoma Patients Receiving Gemcitabine-Docetaxel Chemotherapy
ABSTRACT Background Efficacy of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GEM + DOC) chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma was evaluated. Methods Data of 53 patients from 9 institutions, who received GEM (675 or 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) and DOC (100 mg/m2 on day 8), were retrospectiv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric blood & cancer Vol. 63; no. 9; pp. 1552 - 1556 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-09-2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Background
Efficacy of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GEM + DOC) chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma was evaluated.
Methods
Data of 53 patients from 9 institutions, who received GEM (675 or 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) and DOC (100 mg/m2 on day 8), were retrospectively reviewed.
Results
GEM + DOC was administered as adjuvant (n = 25) or palliative chemotherapy (n = 28). Patients received a median 3 courses (range, 1−10 courses). Objective response rate (CR + PR, where CR is complete response and PR is partial response) and disease control rate (CR+ PR + SD, where SD is stable disease) were 14.3% and 28.6%, respectively. Disease control rate was higher in patients receiving 900 mg/m2 GEM than in patients receiving 675 mg/m2 (50.0% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.03). Higher GEM dose was associated with better survival, both in adjuvant (1‐year overall survival, 90.9 ± 8.7% vs. 38.5 ± 13.5%, P = 0.002) and palliative settings (50.0 ± 14.4% vs. 31.3 ± 11.6%, P = 0.04).
Conclusions
Further studies are necessary to investigate the efficacy of more aggressive and higher doses of GEM + DOC chemotherapy in osteosarcoma. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-6719025G-J ArticleID:PBC26058 istex:A6338B8F0632CE7923C7153D4C05E1460163FDB1 Conflict of interest: Each Grant author certifies that she or he has no commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements). ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1545-5009 1545-5017 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pbc.26058 |